The Great Kidney Bazaar
Tukoji R. PANDIT
The unearthing of an illegal kidney trade in Gurgaon, a Delhi suburb,
could have hardly come as a surprise since India has long been notorious
for being the ‘warehouse for kidneys’-a great kidney bazaar.
Even less surprising was the fact that the alleged kingpin of this
racket, a doctor with various aliases who had earned crores of rupees
through unethical means, managed to escape when police raided his
‘clinic’.
The police find it easier to catch the small time criminal, not the
affluent ones. After all, the alleged kingpin, Amit Kumar whose original
name appears to be Santosh Raut, was first arrested way back in 1994 in
his native Maharashtra, just a year after he had set up practice.
Since then he has been under the police scanner, moving across many
cities in India. Reports say he even managed to spend a few years in
Canada and is in possession of a number of fake passports.
Yet, he aroused no suspicion of the police when he started to
‘operate’ from Gurgaon. The fleeing ‘doctor’ may eventually be caught
because of the attention the case has attracted, but it is unlikely to
see the end of the kidney racket in India where it has been thriving at
accelerated pace for nearly two decades.
Kidney rackets have been unearthed regularly in the past in many
parts of the country.
It is said that what gave a boost to the illegal trade was the ready
availability in the country of the drug that controls the body’s
rejection of foreign objects and advances in surgical techniques. But
what really keeps it going is the old question of the poor being
exploited for the benefit of the rich and the demand and supply
imbalance.
The modus operandi of the illegal kidney trade in India has a bizarre
tale also. There was a time in mid-1990s when some of the ‘donors’ were
sent on a foreign jaunt where they were trapped and forced to part with
their kidney.
This ‘kidney tourism’ racket was unearthed not by the police but the
Customs! Back in 1994 the country had passed a law, the Organ
Transplantation Act, banning kidney trade.
But as with so many other laws enacted in the country it was of no
help in eradicating the illegal practice of kidney trade.
A more realistic assessment would suggest that eradicating the
practice is nearly impossible because of the yawning gap between the
‘demand’ and ‘supply’ of kidney.
Apart from certain shortcomings in the law and inadequacies like lack
of facilities for quick transportation and storage there is a great
shortage of availability of kidney from the cadaver.
For every 1000 kidney transplants in the country the cadaver
transplants account for less than a third. The number of such
transplants is at least 2000 in a year. Besides, the country does not
have a database of donors and recipients.
Those who do not believe that a kidney donor can actually be forced
say that before the removal of the organ a number of tests have to be
conducted and that might take as much as 10 days.
But an unwilling ‘donor’ cannot escape during that time as he is
almost certain to be held as a virtual prisoner.
The law encourages relatives of a patient to donate his or her
kidney. But it is easier said than done, partly because of unfounded
fears about parting with one kidney and sometimes for other reasons,
including the donor’s ailment like diabetes or heart disease or
mismatching of the blood group.
India has a good record of successful kidney transplantation. But the
illegal trade in kidney exists for two reasons: one, it makes up for the
shortage of ‘legal’ donors and two, it is easy in a poor country like
India with illiteracy still widespread among the poorer sections to lure
unsuspecting ‘donors’ with offers of money.
Some time ago an association of kidney patients had estimated that
nearly 65 percent of donors and recipients were unrelated. More often
than not, the actual amount promised to the ‘donor’ is not paid.
This sometimes leads to the victim blowing the whistle on the racket.
But cases have also come to light when the smarter ‘victims’ have
blackmailed and threatened the touts and doctors who had lured them and
managed to extract more money.
But such cases are few as most of the preys of the touts and greedy
doctors are illiterate, poor and vulnerable. A more tragic part of the
story is that sometimes the victims come from an area hit by a natural
disaster. Some of the Tsunami victims were made to ‘donate’ their
kidney.
The crooks who operate the kidney racket take many precautions to
evade detection by the law enforcing agency in addition to using the
standard practice of bribery. Take the Gurgaon racket. Most of the
victims were poor and came from places other than Gurgaon.
Their homes were, however, in western UP, which is not that far from
Gurgaon. There have been cases of victims having been brought to a place
like Chennai all the way from Nepal or Bihar.
After the country passed the law against illegal trade in kidney it
has become mandatory that a duly constituted transplantation
authorisation committee will satisfy itself that the donor who is not a
relative of the intended recipient has not been lured by money
consideration.
But such a committee can be under some kind of moral pressure when it
all boils down to the question of saving a patient’s life.
It goes without saying that only the very rich can afford kidney
transplant in India where its cost, however, is considerably less than
in other parts of the world, making it attractive for foreign patients
to come to India.
Not all of them can be expected to be aware of the illegal and
unethical practices that thrive here. Much of ‘medical tourism’ in India
is legitimate and brings the country a good name.
But the clandestine kidney racket is the other side of the unofficial
‘medical tourism’ promoted by some unscrupulous doctors and surgeons who
obviously are unconcerned about ethics. What matters to them is their
network of countrywide touts-and a constant flow of cash happy patient
from India and other countries. Syndicate Features
|