The truth about Sethu Samudram
M.V. Kamath
Writing in Frontline (October 15), Shri B.Ramachandran reveals some
extremely important facts that merit attention. In the first place, he
states that the Ram Sethu “is a discontinuous chain of sand bars dotting
a 30 km stretch in the East-West direction between the southern tip of
Rameshwaram island in India and Talaimannar is north western Sri Lanka,
creating a geographic divide between the Palk Bay and the Gulf of Mannar.”
Then he makes the point that paleo-geographic studies suggest that
the sea level in the region has oscillated significantly over historical
times, exposing the seabed between India and Sri Lanka periodically.
According to him “around 6,000 to 7,000 years ago, the sea level was
just 17 meters below the present level, resulting in partial exposure of
the seabed.
The Marine and Water Resources Group of SAC/ISRO.... concluded after
space-based investigations that the so-called Adam’s Bridge-or Ram Sethu-is
not man-made but comprises 103 small patch reefs lying in a linear
pattern with reef crest (flattened, emergent, especially during low
tides) and intermittent deep channels.
The MWRG interpreted the linearity of the Sethu to be due to the old
shore line-implying that the two land masses of India and Sri Lanka were
once connected.
What can we deduce from these admissions? One, that a long time ago,
India and Sri Lanka were indeed linked by a wall of coral in one
continual stretch. Two, were times when that wall was broken at
intervals by violent sea waves, but not to the extent of making repairs
difficult.
From this we can deduce that if someone were to fill these
intermittent minor channels with sand and stones, it would still be
possible to acquire a continuous link between India and Sri Lanka,
practically a roadway-call it a ‘bridge’ for all one cares-that would
enable a vanar sena to cross over from India to Sri Lanka effortlessly,
even in single file.
Ergo, what a vanar sena merely had to do was to fill in the
intermittent sea channels with stones to make a transportable way from
the Indian subcontinent to the Sri Lanka island, requiring no major
feat.
That would mean that some vanar sena did build a ‘bridge’ using
nature as a base. If we admit this rational explanation, one can accept
both propositions: One, that a link of sorts was already in existence
when the vanar sena came to think of it and two, that the Sena did
indeed help build a bridge, by filling in broken gaps in the coral reef
with capacious stones and sand.
Granting that the entire connection was not man-made and that a
discontinuing physical link was already in existence, what the vanars
did apparently was to fill in the intermittent breaks within the
continuous coral wall to build a smooth highway for free movement. If
this is understood, discussion then ceases.
One can believe that the vanars did indeed build a ‘bridge’- though
not in the usual meaning of the term. If this line of thinking is
accepted - and why shouldn’t it not? - then everything falls in its
place. One can accept both the scientific findings as well as the
so-called mythology surrounding the Ram Sethu.
In regard to the latter, all that one had to do was for the vanars to
carry stones to help fill in the gaps in the broken coral reef wall and
thereby complete the passage-way from India to Sri Lanka for the smooth
transport of men and material.
Let us now take an expert’s views on the usefulness and relevance of
the proposed Sethu Samudram project. In an interview to Rediff. Captain
H.
Balakrishnan, who has been associated with the Navy for 32 years and
is knowledgeable about the pluses and minuses of the Project, has made
some relevant observations. According to him, from a mariner’s
standpoint, the Sethu Samudram project “does not make any nautical
sense”.
In the first place, the Indian Metereological Department has assigned
the coast between Rameshwaram and Cuddalore as “a high risk
probability”. Thus, in 1964 the Pamban Bridge was washed away by a
severe cyclonic storm.
In the second place, maintaining a depth of 12 metres for ships to
pass will entail round-the-year dredging. Once the Channel is set up it
will have to be continuously dredged and that adds to the maintenance
expenditure. This is a hidden cost.
Then again, by the very nature of the project, a 60,000 deadweight
tonne carrier will need anything in excess of 12 metre draft. But 60,000
tonne carriers are a thing of the past.
Today we have very large carriers of the type of 150,000 and 185,000
tonnes none of which will ever be able to use the Sethu Samudram. Even
more relevantly, for a ship to pass through the Sethu Samudram waters,
it will drastically cut down on its speed because the water is shallow
and a moving ship will create what it known as the “Squat Effect”.
According to Capt. Balakrishnan, a large ship has to cut down its
speed from around 12 and 13 knots per hour to about six knots,
especially if it is a bulk carrier.
Then again, Sethu Samudram is not an open seaway. It is like entering
into a port. A pilot has to board a ship which ordinarily means that for
letting a pilot aboard, an hour has to be wasted and similarly another
hour has to be wasted to let him down.
Asks Capt. Balakrishnan: “With this six knot speed and two hours
pilotage delay, the time to Tuticorin via Sethu Samudram works out to
100 hours 30 minutes. If one went round Sri Lanka, the time taken would
be 102 hours 15 minutes.
So the net savings in time by going through Sethu Samudram is 1 hours
45 minutes. Would it be worth spending Rs 2,400 crores - the amount
sanctioned for the entire Project - just to save 105 minutes of sailing?
Whatever the authorities under political pressure might exaggerate,
Shri Balakrishnan doesn’t expect more than 1,000 ships using the Sethu
Samudram canal. Taking into account cost incurred per ship, using the
Sethu Samudram route would entail shipping companies lose Rs 1.9 million
per voyage.
According to Capt. Balakrishnan, what is being planned “is a white
elephant in the making”.
The writer is a senior journalist |