Business Consumer Affairs
Citizens Advice Bureau
This is a concept which is successfully operated in the United
Kingdom and Europe in order to help the public in any area that they
need assistance for. The society has so complicated that its citizens
cannot decide where to go and what to do when they are faced with
complicated issues.
We must learn to import and accept good things from the West. This is
one of the best systems to help the public in most areas. The CAB in the
UK is assisted and mooted by councils, voluntary organisations and
societies. There is a head office which gives directions to the CABs
which are completely backed by the government and also the European
Union.
The model envisages in Sri Lanka will be situated in the CAA premises
assisted by the Legal Aid Commission, Legal Aid Foundation, the
Government Call Centre (1919), Quality organisation and the public.
Anybody who needs assistance can walk in, telephone or write to the CAB.
There are plans to obtain the services of volunteers, retired senior
government servants, academics and professionals. This will be managed
and run by minimum expenditure and by using available resources.
His Excellency the High Commissioner of the United Kingdom was
briefed on the project and is prepared to be present as the Chief Guest
and extend full co-operation to launch the project which is prevalent in
the United Kingdom.
Apart from this project there are many on the pipe line. Cost of
Living, healthy living and simple life mooted on previous pages is a
concept to be promoted in order to educate the citizens a simple healthy
life and also to give guidelines as to what to buy, what not to buy,
where to buy and how to buy, healthy consumer items of highest quality
for reasonable price.
The CAA has also mooted and commended the national agricultural
policy put forward by the government which is a need of the hour. It is
also necessary for the CAA to strictly adhere to and to implement
Section 26 of the CAA Act which requires all the traders to exhibit the
prices of consumer items.
The CAA has mooted the vision and the aim for a “Just Trader and
Alert Consumer”. To achieve this end the authority has identified one
hundred good traders to whom trophies and certificates were presented in
recognising their services to the society, by being acting reasonably
and professionally, especially during the festive season.
The CAA has taken steps to be environmental friendly and to live with
the nature. We have published the full speech of Honourable Ladyship
Justice Shirani Tilakawardena’s presentation on 31 July 2007, at the
Workshop on Compliance with Judicial Orders through Greater Citizen
participation organised by the Public Interest Law Foundation and the
Centre for Environmental Justice.
It is time for professionals and activists to be active in order to
help the public and to bring down the price of consumer items,
especially and mainly the life ordinary consumer who consumes essential
items.
The CAA has looked into the problems of consumer in depth that are at
the mercy of banks and lending organisations. CAA being the regulator
has played a major role in acting as a buffer. In this sense CAA has
taken steps to organise a number of seminars on New Companies Act.
The other main conceptual proposal is the Home Grown Consumer Courts
based on Courts in India and other parts of the world. There is a
proposition to make use of the Mediation Board which has spread all over
the country to share the burden to the CAA, in order to harmonise the
duplicity and for effectual and fast remedies.
It is the duty of the CAA to improve and assist healthy competition
and also be cautious on large scale mergers in order to prevent carting.
Carting is a process where the trader is benefited but not the consumer.
Proposals have been suggested by the CAA during the process of the
amendment to the CAA.
Unethical Promotion of Drug and was the main theme of the Consumer
Day. It is time for the Ministry of Health to work hand in hand with the
CAA, SLSI in order to bring strict regulations in the drug trade which
is as lucrative as oil or any other major trade in the world.
As a result of the magnitude of drug trade, the victims are the
consumers who are being exploited by drug traders and professions. It is
alleged that the doctors are in the pay roll of these drug people.
It is time for the consumers to get themselves organised. As in other
parts of the world consumer is always right and consumer is the king.
Unfortunately it is not necessary the case here to achieve this.
Authority has a target of setting up Consumer societies in every
village. We have to achieve this soon based on our activism and hard
work of the staff.
The CAA works hard to achieve the end results and exercising the
balancing of proposals. CAA is obliged to carry on the government
policy, Mahinda Chintana and the Act. It is not easy and it has to be
done in the interest of the majority.
It is time for the public to work hand in hand with the CAA, the
Government, traders, industrialists, manufacturers and organised
consumerism at large. The CAA has acted as a catalyst in the promotion
of rice based food.
An year ago CAA has activated it by conducting seminars at various
places and organising the government and private sector such as ITI,
SLSI, Government Research Institution and the private sector.
The rest was very successful and it is time that the public take part
in activism. It is very pleased to hear that many other private
political, government and non government organisations have taken steps
on this direction.
The CAA has mooted for a consumer charter in Sri Lanka and World
Charter. This is necessary to be as guidelines and also to take part in
international affairs on this aspect.
The response we have received was very encouraging.
It is also time that the government to take measures to avoid
duplicity in various organisations, for example ITI, SLSI, CAA and
Health Department should work together hand in hand identifying the
areas of work independently or jointly.
Popularization of local food consumer items and local industries were
mooted by the CAA. It is time for us to promote our own milk. 20 years
ago we were not importing any milk powder.
Unfortunately the government and semi government industries sold to
private sector and we depend on foreign countries for milk powder. This
is very sad that we spend billions and billions of our national economy
on food items.
50% of food items are imported at a cost of Rs. 900 billion which can
make our country one of the most economically powerful. It is time as
His Excellency has mooted to grow our own food on all free available
spaces. Only solution is to grow our own food which is cheap, healthy
and free of poison.
What we import is not necessarily healthy and obviously not fresh. We
could understand why we import apple which are stored for months and
consume when we have our own fresh pairs, bananas, papaw which are very
expensive in other parts of the world. Papaw which is sold in Sri Lanka
at Rs. 40 on the market will be around GBP 2,000 in a Super Market in
the United Kingdom.
We import this food from Australia, USA and other countries which
have cold climates. The fruit in cold climates are not tasty and
healthy.
We could not understand why Coca Cola which is poisonous in place of
Thambili which is most nourishing. We do not understand why people eat
bread of wheat flour which is harmful and less nourishing when we have
our own local rice which is of highest nutritious values on which our
ancestors lead healthy and long lives.
This shows that it is time for us to change our attitude on our
living to live with nature and to live a simple life. This process will
definitely bring down the cost of living.
Government has introduced legislation to control the essential items
such as gas, flour and other other 14 items. The traders will have to
seek permission from the CAA in the event of any increase of prices.
These are thoughts in the programme for the CAA for which the public
has full endorsement and support.
The main and most important budget before us is the CAB which we will
be inaugurated in the near future.
Therefore we urge the public to respond to our message and educate
and help us in order to improve and carry on our project.
Consumer Affairs Authority
Facts to remember before purchasing
* Recognize the difference between needs and wants. Needs are
your basic requirements and wants are created by the marketers.
* Make the right choice based on
- Information
- Your needs
- Safety for you and for the environment
* Plan before you shop
- What to buy
- How to buy
- Where to buy
* Check details of products or services such as:
- Labels. Don’t just look for them. Read them carefully
* Check for safety and quality certification
* Do not pay more than the Maximum Retail Price (MRP)
and other important information printed on the label
* Do not buy unlabelled packaged goods
* Ask the store persons to explain the return or exchange policy
* Read and follow the instructions of the product
* Use the product only as recommended by the manufacturer
* Read warranties carefully
* Read the forms given for your signature carefully before you sign
it
* Don’t believe every advertisement you see. In actual purchase,
conditions may differ.
* Do make a serious effort to resist sales pressures
* Carry your own environmentally friendly bag when you go shopping
* Keep all sales receipts, warranties and instructions
* Don’t believe the statement “Goods once sold will not be taken
back or exchanged”. This statement is illegal and holds no value.
- Chandrika Thilakaratne
Director Consumer Affairs and Information, CAA
Promotion of competition and consumer interest
The Consumer Affairs Authority may either of its own motion or on a
complaint or request made to it by any person, any organization of
consumers or an association of traders, carry out an investigation with
respect to the prevalence of any anticompetitive practice.
An anti-competitive practice shall be deemed to prevail, where a
person in the course of business, pursues a course of conduct which of
itself or when taken together with a course of conduct pursued by
persons associate with him, has or is intended to have or is likely to
have the effect of restricting, distorting or preventing competition in
connection with the production, supply or acquisition of goods in Sri
Lanka or the supply or securing of services in Sri Lanka.
Determination of standards and specifications relating to goods and
supply of goods
The Consumer Affairs Authority may for the purpose of protecting the
consumer and ensuring the quality of goods sold or services provided, by
Notification published in the Gazette, from time to time, determine such
standards and specifications relating to the production, manufacture,
supply, storage, transportation and sale of any goods, and to the supply
of any services.
The Authority may by Notification published in the Gazette adopt such
standards and specifications prescribed by the Sri Lanka Standards
Institution established by the Sri Lanka Standards Institution Act No. 6
of 1984, relating to the production, manufacture, supply, storage,
transportation and sale of any goods and to the supply of any services
as standards and specifications to be determined.
The Authority may inquire into complaints regarding-
(a) the production, manufacture, supply, storage, transportation or
sale of any goods and to the supply of any services which does not
conform to the standards and specifications determined.
(b) the manufacture or sale of any goods which does not conform to
the warranty or guarantee given by implication or otherwise, by the
manufacturer or trader.
A complaint which relates to the sale of any goods or to the
provision of any service shall be made to the Authority in writing
within three months of the sale of such goods or the provisions of such
service, as the case may be.
At any inquiry held into a complaint the Authority shall give the
manufacturer or trader against whom such complaint is made an
opportunity of being heard either in person or by an agent nominated in
that behalf.
Where after an inquiry into a complaint, the Authority is of opinion
that a manufacture or sale of any goods or the provision of any services
has been made which does not conform to the standards or specifications
determined or deemed to be determined by the Authority, or that a
manufacture or sale has been made of any goods not conforming to any
warranty or guarantee given by implication or otherwise by the
manufacturer or trader, it shall order the manufacturer or trader to pay
compensation to the aggrieved party or to replace such goods or to
refund the amount paid for such goods or the provision of such service,
as the case may be.
Where any manufacturer or trader fails or refuses to comply with an
order such manufacturer or trader shall be guilty of an offence under
the Act, and the sum of money due on the order as compensation or refund
may, on application being made in that behalf by the Authority to the
Magistrate’s Court having jurisdiction over the place of business or
residence of such manufacturer or trader as the case may be, be
recovered in like manner as a fine imposed by such court,
notwithstanding that such sum may exceed the amount of a fine, which
that court may, in the exercise of its ordinary jurisdiction, impose.
Globalisation, competition, competitiveness and consumer protection
The experiences of poorer countries in assessing the impact of
globalisation on competition, competitiveness and consumer welfare, it
is reported the during economic reforms in Uganda, extensive economic
liberalisation, including the privatisation of State enterprises, had
led to a number of anti-competitive practices by foreign firms which
constituted abuse of dominance.
Such practices included buying off competitors, and dumping
defective, hazardous and/or substandard goods on domestic markets. It
has been reported that some firms had been accused of selling
substandard lubricants to rural consumers, and marketing suspect dairy
products, beef, cooking oil and other food items under the guise of food
aid.
Other examples of unscrupulous business practices included the misuse
of ISO 9000 as a product quality mark. Also, competition had been
distorted by leading firms’ price-fixing and market-sharing
arrangements, particularly in the beverages and petroleum industries.
It was reported that the trade associations formed by those two
industries were an excuse for fixing prices and sharing markets.
It emerged from the discussions that many developing country
Governments had largely been unable or reluctant to respond to
complaints lodged by consumer protection associations and the general
public for a number of reasons.
These included the absence of competition and consumer protection
legislation or authorities, a lack of resources - both human and
financial - to investigate complaints, impotence in the face of global
mergers and acquisitions for fear of retaliatory action by some large
firms’ home country, political interference, and fear of frightening
away foreign direct investment.
Experts pointed out that in some cases, while looking for the
benefits of globalisation many countries were grappling with
anti-competitive practices arising from mergers and acquisitions by
mega-firms as a result of trade liberalisation and privatisation. These
mergers and acquisitions had been mainly in the banking and financial
sectors, and in tourism.
Problems relating to various types of international fraud, such as
pyramid schemes, had been uncovered by developing countries. An
intensive education campaign in that connection had had little effect,
particularly among consumers from the poorer sections of the population,
and many had lost money as a result of such schemes.
While some of the abuses had been prosecuted in some countries under
common or criminal law, there was an urgent need for specific
legislation. Other problems, which Governments were trying to come to
grips with, included jurisdictional issues relating to electronic
commerce and cases of counterfeiting.
It was indicated that in countries whose competition law did not
include provisions relating to mergers and acquisitions, there was some
scope for examining mergers and acquisitions, under legal provisions
covering anti-competitive practices and for recourse to common-law
principles.
It emerged from the discussions that this issue should be revised and
that competition laws should include specific provisions relating to
mergers and acquisitions, with factors such as market thresholds, scales
for competitiveness and the size of domestic markets in a global market
being taken into consideration.
At the regional level several integration groupings, including the
Caribbean Community (CARICOM), had formulated community competition
policies that were expected to boost national laws. The harmonisation of
national competition laws and issues concerning the extent to which
sovereign rights might have to yield to regional concerns remained to be
tackled.
Other issues, particularly for countries that had not yet introduced
competition law, related to the availability of resources for
implementation and the costs associated with it.
In addition, participants referred to the potential conflict with
other agreements, including on trade and investment issues, and to
implementing competition policies in smaller economies while giving
specific consideration to the particular vulnerability of those
economies.
If consumers were confused by the information given by the seller, it
might be appropriate to require greater disclosure. Where there was an
uneven basis of comparison, pro-competitive standardisation would be
appropriate and standards bureau had an obvious role to play in this
regard.
It was pointed out that information-sharing among competition and
consumer protection authorities was vital for curbing international
frauds such as pyramid schemes. A question raised in this context was
how to protect consumers in a global economy.
It was reported that the United States International Consumer
Database monitored such schemes, and that the database was available to
any country that might wish to use it or contribute information to it.
Consumer education on a global basis, information-sharing and
transparency were necessary in order to make consumers better able to
protect themselves from unscrupulous business practices.
Countries needed to undertake joint action to safeguard themselves
against cross-border fraud. Areas of particular concern to consumers in
e-commerce were security issues related to payments on-line and consumer
redress in the event of disputes.
It was stressed that competitive markets were the first line of
defence, and Governments were urged not to compromise free-market
principles in the quest for consumer protection.
- Executive Director, CAA
Questions and Answers
1.(Q) I bought a dress from a shop for Rs. 2250 to give it as a
present for one of my friends. Having understood that it is not suited,
I tried to get it changed after two weeks time. But they failed to do
the needful although they promised at the point of selling.
(A) It is your duty/ responsibility to bring the matter to the
attention of the shop keeper as soon as possible for the purpose of
getting what you intend. However, you can lodge a complaint with the
Authority in the first place to determine the facts of the case.
2.(Q) The sole of pair of shoes which was bought by me gave way and
as a result it was, I returned to the company. They say that they can
neither refund the money nor give a replacement but repair only.
(A) If the item purchased fails to satisfy the needs of the customer
either a replacement or a refund should be given you may put up a
complaint to the CAA.
3.(Q) When inquired about a Gas cooker of a certain brand which I
preferred, I was forced to buy another brand which was said to be
better. But it does not work properly.
(A) As per the provisions of the CAA Act No. 9 of 2003, cheating or
deceiving a customer is an offence. You may make a written complaint to
the Authority to proceed further.
4.(Q) I bought some medicine as a treatment for my sickness, but they
are available at lower prices at the market place.
(A) As there is no control over prices of medicine, it is the duty of
the customer to inquire into price of such medicine before purchasing.
At the same time prices of medicines produced in various countries are
different depending on cost of production and the raw materials.
5.(Q) I was charged a sum of Rs. 1,560 for a pair of shoes the price
of which had been marked at Rs. 1,290. When inquired, I was told that
the price has been increased now.
(A) No trader can sell or offer to sell items over the prices marked
on the items.
The customer has the right for a refund of the money additionally
charged from him. If the trader continues to commit the same offence,
legal action can be initiated against him.
6.(Q) I bought a pair of gold ear studs from a jewellery shop. When I
took them for pawning, I was told that it is not made of pure gold. What
redress can I get?
(A) Jewellery made are valued in carat. There is 16,18,20,22 and 24
gold carot. Jewellery are inspected by the Gem and Jewellery Authority.
Make your complaint to the CAA for representation.
7.(Q) There was a permanent sticker on a computer accessory stating
“Life time warranty” when purchased. While using it went out of order.
When it was taken for a replacement, the trader didn’t agree to replace
it free of charge but giving other definition for the warranty. I “Life
time warranty” meaningless?
(A) If such warranty is given, the trader should replace it free of
charge. If he fails to do so, he can be charged for deceptive conduct
under CAA Act.
8.(Q) Engine oil for three-wheelers is measured with empty Coca-Cola
bottles at fuel pumping stations. Do we get the actual quantity?
(A) Each and every measurement is stamped yearly by the relevant
officials. So this measuring cannot be correct as it is not yearly
stamped. It cannot be used for business purposes. It is illegal.
9.(Q) I understood that the item purchased from the shop “X” is not
in conformity with the required standard. As I was not issued a bill/
receipt, is it impossible for me to have redress?
(A) The Customer should be issued a bill to confirm the dealing, but
it is not in any way, a barrier to make a complaint to the Authority.
10.(Q) The price of book published in India now has rapidly
decreased. But I was charged Rs. 750 which is the price marked on the
cover of the book.
(A) Based on the cost of production, manufacturer/ publisher of the
book has marked the price of the book which you purchased. Even though
the new editions of the same book are available at lower prices at the
market old editions can not be sold at the new rate. |