US General’s plan means 10 more years of war: Democrats
UNITED STATES: Democrats charged General David Petraeus’s
latest Iraq strategy was a blueprint for 10 more years of war, as they
rejected “rosy” claims of battlefield progress and demanded a speedy US
withdrawal.
The Democratic counter-attack came as President George W. Bush
prepared to address Americans on future Iraq strategy on Thursday, and
war commander Petraeus endured a roasting in Congress.
“President Bush’s policy announced by General Petraeus is a path to
10 more years of war in Iraq,” said Nancy Pelosi, speaker of the House
of Representatives in a statement after meeting the president at the
White House.
“General Petraeus’ testimony to Congress drew a bright line:
redeployment is not an option; endless war in Iraq is the
administration’s only option.”
Petraeus said during two days of marathon congressional testimony
that the “surge” of some 30,000 more troops into Baghdad was working,
and that US troop numbers could recede back to around 130,000 by next
summer.
But Pelosi slammed such a scenario as “an insult to the intelligence
of the American people.”
The White House said Bush would make a live televised address at 9:00
pm Thursday.
Senate Democrats argued the surge had failed in its prime goal —
forging political reconciliation between Iraq’s warring factions.
“We should stop the surge and start bringing our troops home,” said
senior Democratic Senator Joseph Biden.
Carl Levin, another veteran Democrat, said claims the surge was
working was part of a “litany of delusion” by the Bush administration on
Iraq.
Democratic presidential front-runner Hillary Clinton said the reports
by Petraeus and US ambassador to Baghdad Ryan Crocker demanded the
“willing suspension of disbelief.”
But another Democratic presidential hopeful Senator Barack Obama,
said it was wrong to hold a hearing on a day filled with echoes of the
attacks.
“It perpetuates this notion that, somehow, the original decision to
go into Iraq was directly related to the attacks on 9/11,” he said.
Petraeus, who testified before the House of Representatives on
Monday, said US forces could gradually be reduced from their current
168,000 strength, to pre-surge levels of around 130,000 by mid-2008. But
Democratic Senator Barbara Boxer accused the general of painting an
overly optimistic picture.
“I ask you to take off your rosy glasses,” she said. “We are sending
our troops where they are not wanted, with no end in sight, in the
middle of a civil war, in the middle of the mother of all mistakes.”
Republican war critic Chuck Hagel had a similar complaint.
“Are we going to continue to invest American blood and treasure at
the same rate as we are now? For what?”
But Republican presidential hopeful Senator John McCain, a staunch
defender of the surge, warned: “The consequences of American defeat in
Iraq will be terrible and longlasting.
“Iraq has become the central front of the global war on terror.”
Washington, Wednesday, AFP |