Grade One Admissions - Is there a solution?
The Education Ministry’s preparations to
admit children to schools for the year 2008 has faced a
dilemma with the new draft National Policy for School
Admission and Management of Schools coming under fire from
many quarters.
While the Government has pledged to come
up with a fresh school admissions policy fair by all, it is
likely that the previous policy based on the ‘one mile rule’
will be adopted with necessary modifications to admit
children to Grade One next year.
Yet, while pointing out the drawbacks of
the new circular, like the allocation of marks for parental
considerations which is discriminatory itself, and practical
problems with regard to testing the IQ of a six-year-old
child, it must be reiterated that the lasting solution to
this problem lies only in a comprehensive program to ensure
the equitable distribution of resources among all schools in
the country.
To achieve this end, it is imperative that
the present system of categorising schools to Maha
Vidyalayas, A or B grade schools etc., is done away with, so
that there will be no discrimination or disparity between
the so-called ‘popular’ schools and the ‘under-privileged’
schools in term of facilities or human resources.
In this respect, one has to keep in mind
that the phenomenon of ‘under-privileged’ schools is not
confined to rural areas, but is common even to the Capital
where 66,000 of the population live in under-served
settlements.
Write to us on the above issues as we take
up the issue of Grade One school admissions on Daily News
Debate this month. Send in your views (750-1,000 words) to
‘Daily News Debate’, Daily News, Associated Newspapers of
Ceylon Limited, PO Box 1217, Colombo, or via e-mail to
[email protected] before August 25, 2007.
|
A National Policy on Education - the solution
Jaya Radampola
Sometime back the National Education Commission (NEC) invited for
‘proposals’ for a ‘National Policy on Tertiary and Vocational Education
and University Education stating ‘Views and Submissions are invited from
the General Public mainly on the following topics’.
It listed 24 topics from ‘Admission to Higher Educational
Institutions’ to ‘Linkage between Higher Education Institution; Local
and Foreign’, thus constraining ‘Proposals on a National Policy’ by the
general public and others to ‘administrative confusions and turmoil
within the existing system’ which had nothing to do with a ‘National
Policy’ or the two main functions of the NEC as published.
Being ‘confused’ myself I decided to include the 24 Topics and the
‘Two Functions’ of the NEC as published in the said notice in one topic
‘National Policy on Education’ embracing A - Z of education, commencing
with ‘School Admissions and School Education’ and culminating with
‘Tertiary and Vocational Education and University Education’ since each
‘topic’ depends on the other(s).
Conditionality is ‘universal’ to all ‘things’ conditioned by causes
and justify its application to our problem under review. Accordingly,
each ‘Topic’ of the 26 NEC issues depends on the other(s) and the basic
cause - Pre-Primary Education, Preschool Education and Admission to
Grade/Year One in School.
Thus, with the removal of all ‘cankers’ that afflicts and pollutes
the ‘basic cause’ all the other ‘issues’ will cease and create the ideal
situation for a wholesome National Education Policy creating access and
opportunities for tertiary, vocational, and university education to each
and every child.
‘Education is development of character or moral powers of a person
(child or adult) to be good and to do good to self, man, animal, and
nature’. And this in ‘real-life’ situation is development of wisdom,
morality, and concentration through wholesome education which begins
with birth as a child.
A ‘revolutionary change’ in any ‘system’ is extremely difficult.
Convincing ‘relevant authorities’ with their varying ‘interests’,
‘models’ and ‘views’ to accept ‘progressive and people friendly change’
is an onerous task. There will be ‘staunch’ resistance from powerful
sectors with ‘vested interests’ that are against ‘Education’ and
‘Development’ reaching the ‘ordinary people’.
Yet for all, I made the following observations and ‘proposals’ with
the belief that they will assist the NEC in formulating a ‘Novel System
of Education’ where every child is provided with appropriate primary,
secondary, tertiary and vocational education and university education
conducive to the betterment of our future generation and the nation, in
keeping with our wholesome ‘traditional values’ some of which still
sustain our nation in spite of all the confusion and turmoil the country
has been facing for over 500 years commencing 1505 AD.
Solution to the problem
The ‘ideal’ solution to the Problem is a National Policy on Education
embracing A - Z of education commencing with ‘SCHOOL ADMISSIONS’ and
culminating with tertiary, vocational and university education as stated
earlier. Thus, any solution should be ‘development-based’ creating
access and opportunities to ‘all children’ for the above levels of
education as appropriate to achieve the National Targets for a sound
economy within our resources.
Any solution should develop the ‘child’s’ mental hygiene (development
of traditional values) for physical and psychological balance (the base
for wholesome people cooperation and social harmony) and ecological and
provide economical wisdom leading to parallel economic development and
the preservation of the natural environment through a planned process of
‘learning to Know, learning to Do, learning to live together, and
learning to be’, as highlighted by the UNESCO.
Benefits
* Abolition of the prevailing cumbrous ‘admission system’ will result
in innumerable savings to the State and the People.
* Equal educational opportunities and facilities to all children.
* Primary-Secondary education within walking distance to all.
* Abolition of the Grade/Year 5 Scholarship Exam and the related ills
to the children and society; the Senior Secondary and Tertiary Education
and Vocational Education being provided within the DSD and within
walking/cycling distance to all students.
* Tertiary Education to all as appropriate to the district and/or
country increasing the efficiency of the work-force at all levels; thus
raising the economic and social development within a few years.
* Elimination of competition to enter Higher/University Education.
* Higher education to all within the District eliminating student
unrest.
* Consolidation of ‘People Participation’ within ‘School Zones’ and
the resultant development of co-operation and harmony amongst people in
all activities.
* Solidarity amongst religious leaders, teachers, village elders and
the community in a ‘School Zone’ and extending this trend to Divisional,
District and National Levels.
* A host of other direct and indirect benefits at all levels of
society created by the ‘existing system’, haven for ‘fraud and
mal-practices’.
Conclusions
1. The ‘National Education’ issue was discussed in the above
paragraphs in summary with a possible ‘Novel System’ somewhat
‘Revolutionary’ through which almost all the disparities and
irregularities inherent in the prevailing system could be eliminated.
The resultant savings can be mobilised for educational development
and advancement - specially the ‘primary education at village level’
thus preventing the ‘confusion’ and ‘turmoil’ we are facing today.
2. A unique ‘technique - mobilising direct people-participation’ is
introduced in the above solutions. This could be used in resolving
almost all our ‘social problems’, if those concerned - politicians,
legislators, professionals, administrators and the people possess the
‘will’ and ‘courage’ to resort to ‘pragmatic and revolutionary changes’
appropriate to our resources, culture and economy and make certain
sacrifices for the betterment of our future generations.
3. A major obstacle will be the existing ‘Parent Teacher Associations
and Old Boys/Girls Associations’ of the ‘Popular Schools’, now
categorised as ‘National Schools’, who will fight for ‘historical
identities’ etc., for the sustenance of the ‘brown-sahib culture’ - the
bane to ‘National Development’ through people participation.
My proposals are to convert National Schools to either District
Universities and Tertiary Institutions/Colleges functioning as
‘Affiliated University Colleges’ to be fully effective in 2011 if the
‘novel system’ is adopted in 2008.
Solution to this obstacle is to establish Primary Secondary Schools
(Gr. 1-11) and Senior Secondary Schools (Gr. 12-13) carrying the
existing popular names under the proposed ‘Zone Basis’, each Zone
containing a PSS having all the facilities in the ‘so-called’ Popular
Schools (adding up to around 30 all over the country) in close proximity
to them where parents are resorting to ‘cut-throat’ competition to admit
their children.
Summary of recommendations
1. Creation of a School Zone System to achieve the following
objectives:
a. Every Child can walk to his School (Primary - Secondary) in 20
minutes (1.6km);
b. Every Teacher can reach her/his School within 60 minutes;
c. Every School is provided with:
i. Its full ‘complement of teachers’ from within the Village/DS
Division/District;
ii. A complete Library;
iii. A complete Science Laboratory and
iv. All necessary equipments and materials.
d. Every Child will benefit from ‘Educational Reforms’
2. Establishment of 7500 Primary Secondary Schools (PSS) - One for
each School Zone.
3. Establishment of 1250 Senior Secondary Schools (SSS) - Five in
each Divisional Secretariat Division (DSD) or One for every Six PSS
4. Establishment of 1000 Tertiary & Vocational Colleges or Affiliated
University Colleges - Four in each DSD.
5. Establishment of 25 District Universities - One in each District
6. Convert the present Universities to National Universities and
entrust all Post Graduate Studies, Specialization, Research and
Continuous Professional Development & Updating in the respective Fields
to cater the National Need and International Demand giving priority to
the National Needs.
---------------------------
Admission to Grade One should be made purely on merit
Savimon Urugodawatta
DIFFERENCE: Students at an ‘under-privileged’ school. Aren’t
they entitled to the same facilities as children attending
popular schools in the city?
|
Education administrators, guided by politicians without vision,
carried out a number of operations in the body of education from time to
time, thereby bringing forth the predicament that education has come to
today. Some of the ill-conceived reforms carried out can be enumerated
as follows:
a) In the early 1950s, there were three compulsory subjects for the
Senior Level Examination, namely, First Language (mother tongue), Second
Language (English/Pali/Sanskrit/Tamil etc.) and Arithmetic or
Mathematics.
Subsequently, these were reduced to two subjects, namely, the First
Language and Arithmetic/Mathematics. Sinhalese Language and Literature
(also Tamil Language and Literature) which were treated as two subjects
were made in to one, making the students neither proficient in language
nor in literature.
This has resulted in the decline of the Sinhala/Tamil language even
among the University Professors and Lecturers, leave alone teachers.
b) With the coming into being of the Provincial Councils (which had
only ruined the country and not even solved the problem for which they
were established), the education became a devolved subject coming within
the purview of the Provincial Councils.
However, successive governments established another set of schools
called National Schools administered by the line Ministry, without
establishing adequate machinery to administer them. Due to this remote
control system, most of the National Schools (including most Central
Schools) are being neglected and today some of them had become more and
more uncontrollable just as the Universities.
c) There is no transfer system for Principals and teachers in both
National schools and Provincial schools. Even if a Principal is found to
be inefficient and corrupt, he cannot be replaced or transferred due to
stringent procedures. If a Provincial schoolteacher wants a transfer to
a national school, he has to go through 14 steps.
d) In the days gone by, there were Boards of Survey carried out
annually in every school and Administration, Finance, Inventories,
methods of teaching, results at Public Exams, Sports, Environment etc.
were all checked by a competent team from the Education Department.
As far as I am aware, this vital aspect of education administration
has been neglected. I am aware of a school where the Principal of the
school has changed four times during a period of nearly 30 years,
without Boards of Survey being held.
e) The Navodaya Scholarship system which replaced the 5th Standard
Scholarship Examination introduced by C W W K, has created a system of
so-called Popular Schools, thereby uprooting the village children from
their cultural environment and exposing them to a cosmopolitan culture.
This was running counter to the Kannangara system which brought up
children in their traditional environment. His vision was to develop
decentralised centres of higher learning spread throughout the country.
It is a well-known fact that most parents are only interested in their
children only up to Grade 5 and thereafter, their destiny is left in the
hands of the schoolteachers and Tuition Masters.
f) The tuition system, which has now become the canker in the whole
education system, has come into being from the time the school
curriculum and syllabuses were revised, leaving a gap between the O/L
syllabus and A/L syllabus, bringing forth a set of Tuition Masters, who
came in to fill in the gap, without which children could not follow A/L
classes.
In our days, there was continuity in the syllabuses of all subjects,
from 6th Standard up to University level. This tuition system has
completely negated the main purpose and objective of Education, namely,
moulding a child to be a good citizen of the country with the
appropriate skills and vision.
g) International Schools - Education, which was considered a sacred
subject from time immemorial, has now become a profitable venture as a
result of the neglect of English in the normal Government schools.
These schools, registered under the Company Ordinance or as BOI
Projects, bring up children in an atmosphere of an alien culture,
imparting knowledge in subjects relevant to British Education system,
much against the vision of Dr. C.W.W. Kannangara and against the
existing Law of the Island pertaining to education.
h) The underlying vision of these International schools was well
manifested when reading a news item that appeared in the Daily News of
February 8, under the heading ‘53 Lankan teens for 2007 Future Leaders
Summit’.
According to this news release, out of the 53 students selected to
represent Sri Lanka at this Future Leaders Summit to be held in
Washington D.C., 50 were from International schools and only three from
National schools (one from Nalanda and two from Royal).
Kannangara’s Vision
It was a visionary like Dr. C.W.W. Kannangara, whom we call the
Father of Free Education, who foresaw the problems the country would
face after independence and prepared the groundwork to place the country
on a sound footing. A few of the important reforms he carried out can be
categorised as follows:
1. Free education for all, irrespective of caste, creed and wealth
(and also age) so that children of all classes could gain knowledge in
the school and develop their brotherhood to become useful citizens of
the country.
2. His education system evolved from the Rural Schools he
experimented from Handessa in the 1930s and which were considered as a
useful experiment in education in the whole of Asia.
3. He established 54 Central Schools covering all the electorates of
the time and equipped them with good and efficient Principals and
teachers, hostels for scholars, laboratories, workshops, playgrounds,
etc., which were then confined to the Christian Missionary Schools and a
few Buddhist denominational schools.
4. He handpicked efficient and straightforward teachers to man these
schools and gave them every encouragement to develop them, keeping a
close eye on them. It was unfortunate that subsequently, such good
Principals were promoted to be Directors of Education without grooming
successors to take over. Such good and efficient Principals should have
been kept in the schools, giving them the necessary perks in the school
itself.
5. Kannangara brought the estate schools to the main stream of
education and looked after the estate children as well, which fact won
him the votes of the estate workers at Mathugama in 1947, whereas, in
other electorates they voted against the UNP.
6. He introduced science, agriculture, woodwork, pottery,
leatherwork, music and dancing, book binding, etc., into the school
curriculum so that children, after leaving school, could be gainfully
engaged in lucrative vocations.
7. He established Resident Training Colleges to train the required
teachers for the various subjects up to Senior level. These are non
existent today.
8. He streamlined the assisted schools belonging to different
denominations by paying the teachers’ salaries direct to the teachers,
thereby doing away with mishandling of government funds by school
managers.
9. He planned to establish Practical Schools for those who failed to
go for higher studies and 8th standard selective test was planned for
this purpose. The succeeding Ministers did not pay any heed to this
matter.
10. He introduced the medium of the mother tongue so that children
could easily develop their thinking faculties, at the same time paying
due attention to the teaching of English and Sinahla/Tamil.
11. Thus, he laid the foundation for a classless and creedless
society, which was the aspiration of the progressives of the time.
School Admissions
Now, coming to the topic of the day, School admissions, we should
reconsider how CWWK evolved his decentralised system of education based
on the then electorates, establishing at least one Central School for
each electorate and developing feeder schools in the area to impart
Primary Education, within easy reach of parents and village temples,
thereby enabling social interaction and development of ethics.
At the same time, he established well-planned Training Colleges to
train teachers for Primary education, science education, handicrafts,
sports, English, aesthetics etc.
These trained teachers and graduates from Ceylon University, Indian
Universities and British Universities were engaged in the Central
Schools to provide a well-planned system of secondary education, leading
to University level, free of charge.
The curricula and syllabi were so prepared to enable a continuing
flow of knowledge, without leaving any gaps to filled by Tuition Masters
as happens today.
Suggestions
(a) What we have to do today is to prepare a school map and locate
and develop good Primary and Secondary schools based on the present
administrative divisions and direct children to the closest standard
school, irrespective of status of the child’s parents.
Children from these schools can be selected for higher education
through a selective test and direct them to Central or Navodya or
National schools in the area based on their performance.
This selective test should concentrate on the intelligence and
general knowledge of the child, about his environment and society, and
not on a spoon-feeding system as happens today, where the child is
groomed for the 5th standard selective test from Grade 1 onwards.
(b) To accommodate the parents who aspire to admit their children to
the so-called Popular schools, about 5 % of those who score highest
marks at the Grade 5 Scholarship Examination in various Districts could
be given places in such schools according to their wishes.
Meanwhile, the Central, Navodya and National Schools should be
developed division - wise, and adequate resources given to them to
develop themselves on par with the so - called popular schools.
This should ultimately lead to a proper decentralization of Education
as envisaged by the 13th Amendment, with the line Ministry only having
the function of supervision to see that the moneys allocated are
utilized to the optimum, thus avoiding wastage. Parents and Past Pupils
should have a greater role to play in the development of the school.
Admission to Grade one should be made purely on merit and not on the
standing or status of the parent. The one mile rule should be strictly
adhered to.
|