Our independence and the transitional legislature
Miran Perera
It is widely accepted that Parliamentary democracy is a system of
governance which has to evolve and grow taking into its fold the native
realities and aspirations. It necessarily involves certain broad
parameters of working and envisages certain principles and policies of
public ethics as its functioning base.
The character and quality of Parliamentary democracy depend on the
quality and calibre of persons who man the parliament. Their behaviour
should be such as to enhance the dignity of Parliament and its members
in general. The degree of esteem in which the people of a country hold
its Parliament is a sign of the success and maturity of its democratic
process.
On February 16th in 1796 the Dutch finally surrendered Colombo to the
British forces. Thereafter the
maritime settlements in Ceylon were first attached to the Madras
presidency, and were administered through military governors.
Madras civil servants were brought to the island to carry on the
civil government. Because in 1797 a formidable revolt among the people,
the Secretary of State in England in order to avert the situation
decided to place the country under the British Crown with the result Sri
Lanka became a crown colony on the 12th of October, 1798.
Yet at this juncture of time our country did not have a significant
legislative body such as the Parliament as we have now. It all began
when the first British governor Frederick North later Earl of Guildford
assumed office displacing Brigadier Fredrick de Meuron who was the
military governor of the time.
The first step taken by Governor North as authorised was to nominate
a council of advice and to form a civil establishment for the island.
This Council was known as His Majesty's council and it was composed
entirely of civil servants presided over by the Governor. It formed the
legislature of the island.
Over the past many decades the face of our Parliament has undergone a
dramatic transformation reflecting the socio-political development of
the nation as a whole.
With our rich heritage spanning over two thousand years Sri Lanka has
been a crucible of many cultures as also systems of governance. After
achieving independence we opted for a parliamentary form of government.
We have amply proved our inherent democratic credentials by successfully
conducting as many as twelve general elections to the Parliament and
many more to other legislatures.
In spite of many trials and tribulations democracy has struck deep
roots in our country. The evolution of the present Parliament since the
time of our independence is a fascinating tale. In 1832 two reports of
the Colebrooke Commission presented made very important and far reaching
recommendations, the majority of which were adopted.
One was the establishment of a legislative council. It was to ensure
open discussion of public affairs and thus protect the people from laws
affecting their rights, privileges, interests and liberties.
During this time the demand for effective participation in the
government and the introduction of an elective principle for the filling
of seats in the legislative council became more insistent than before.
Our post independence history tells us that much of the problems in
the smooth functioning of the parliament arose when ruling parties
behaved arbitrarily, tried to impose their will without discussions and
considered dissent as anti-national and approached the issues with
closed minds.
A new Royal commission known as the Donoughmore Commission was
appointed during the governorship of Sir Herbert Stanley (1927-1931) to
visit Sri Lanka and report on the working of the existing constitution
and on any difficulties in administration which may have risen with it.
Donoughmore Commissioners found that the principal defect in the
existing constitution was the result of a breach between the legislative
and executive councils which was inherent in the constitution itself.
The Governor Sir Herbert Stanley was able by his wit and tact to
support the Donoughmore Constitution which introduced adult franchise or
the right to vote after 21 years of age and abolished communal
representation in the legislature and made provision for the appointment
of native Ministers.
The constitution recommended by the Donoughmore Commissioners in 1928
were revolutionary in certain aspects as it made the State Council to be
elected by adult franchise.
The Soulbury Commission then arrived in Sri Lanka in December 1944
and submitted their report in 1945 recommending a new Constitution. The
new constitution for Sri Lanka was contained in two sets of documents.
(1) The Ceylon Independence Act 1947 and the orders in council of 1947
known collectively as the Ceylon Constitutional and Independence Orders
in Council 1947.
These documents contained the legal powers for full Dominion status
meaning that Sri Lanka had after years of subjugation to foreign rule
emerged as a free nation within the British Commonwealth of nations.
With the gaining of Independence the ceremonial opening of the first
Parliament of Sri Lanka on February 1948 was an occasion of great
historical significance.
The Rt. Hon. D. S. Senanayake became the first Prime Minister and
leader of the first Parliament constituted similarly more or less to the
Westminster system of the British.
The ceremonial opening was performed by the Duke of Gloucester the
brother of King George VI of England. This occasion not only makes the
opening of a new session of a new Parliament but also to remember an
event of the highest importance in the long and chequered history of the
island.
Once again we were free and at liberty to enjoy the freedom so
gained. The British Parliament presented to The House of Representatives
a speakers chair and mace.
Parliamentarians are expected to seriously take up the basic
questions and problems of the people and seek solutions to these
problems through serious and sober debate.
It is accepted that the governments must govern but they will govern
better if subjects to a scrutiny and criticism which is in fact
performed by Parliament and this role cannot be organised in an
unsystematic manner.
To make it systematic and thorough the procedural methods are
necessary and the parliamentary control of matters realistically
conceived is for the purpose of informing the electorate through inquiry
debate and scrutiny of the administration. This process has an indirect
but powerful effect on the electorate.
In the world parliaments are not seen as governments or rivals to
governments but as political communication systems linking governments
and electorates.
It is for this purpose that the various instruments of Parliamentary
control have been devised and it is on the basis of the utilisation of
these instruments by the members of Parliament that the true functions
of Parliament could be realised for which the procedure has to be
adjusted without them being diluted in their essentials.
On May 22, 1972 the Soulbury Constitution was abolished and a new
Republic of Sri Lanka was established under a new constitution.
This Republican Constitution was replaced by another similar
constitution drafted by the United National Party which came in to power
in July 1977 and it still continues as the Democratic Socialist Republic
of Sri Lanka and the Parliamentary system of government skill continues.
The members of the present Parliament have the solemn responsibility
of launching our country in to a new horizon. They have to realise the
ideals and goals enshrined in our constitution and to collectively
endeavour to set new standards and reach higher levels of Parliamentary
conduct. It is said that any institution is as good as its members
choose to make it.
It is thus that the members have to live up to the people's
expectations in heralding a new era in our Parliamentary polity. After
more than half a century since gaining independence the nation usually
wakes up to face February 4th like any other day.
Nowadays it is ushered in silently and quietly without much fanfare
except for the pageantry organised by the State one does not experience
a sense of elation or see excitement or joy on the faces of the people
on this day which is a significant national day.
But just imagine how the people of our land would have felt on
February 4th, way back in 1948. The great day of Freedom, the day of
victory to our little nation which was under foreign rule for more than
four centuries. |