Social Mobility:
Education and social mobility
Jayantha Senevirathna
Children taking part in a drama
|
PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT: As a mid-career professional, looking for a
lucky break, I have been called for interviews for four times since the
dawn of this new millennium. Fascinatingly, all of my prospective
employers or senior executives I came across with were all cheerful
young men around early thirties.
As usual, I performed at my best chatting with ease, but to my utter
dismay they never paid any attention to my neatly packed folder of
educational certificates. First, as a prospective writer, it always was
a questionnaire testing my abilities of separating wheat from the chaff,
and then a friendly chat followed for some time.
Sometimes we discussed personal matters also. And, remarkably, they
never wasted my time keeping me guessing on. Final outcome was obvious
at the end of the discussing.
Why? Are they not interested in educational achievements? I sometimes
came out with a heavy heart trying to answer such questions myself, but
they all were educated young men. First, I just asked the young
foreigner if he is not interested in degrees conferred by local
universities.
Reply came swift and straightforward. Higher education is highly
desirable, but his is not a learning institution, and he has to
concentrate on application as well. All entrepreneurial attempts are
technological based and technology is driven by knowledge.
And, learning is an on-going process concerning innovation. The
employees should be technological innovators as well as learned people.
Therefore, understanding and application have to converge. If your
knowledge is not a platform for innovation, new technologies will not be
in place.
With the ever-increasing forces of globalization, even for the
professions, which demand advanced education, office and personal skills
are vital in rendering the expected services effectively. Apart from
some exclusive professions limited to laboratories and regarding
research, most of the professionals are connected to the outside world
at different levels according to the skills spectrum, and personal
skills matter a lot.
This need is really severe at the middle and lower levels of
management. Employers need employees with office and personal skills
rather than more advanced education. For the part of acquiring personal
skills, it is due to lapses in school education. Instilling character,
culture and morality into youth is the responsibility of the schools.
And again, it is the government's failure to provide school leavers
with the necessary office skills just after leaving the school. Even
though it was a magnanimous step to provide graduates with jobs in the
government sector, it is no secret that the majority of department heads
are in trouble giving them necessary responsibilities. We always
overhear administrative officers complain of such difficulties.
In the private sector, a CEO publicly announced that it is a waste to
spend another six months training them to pick up the skills for an
office job. They could do that by the age of 19 and start moving up.
Spending three or four years at the university and then take another
year to pick up office skills is a real waste of time and youth.
In the private sector, in fast growing industries, untrained
graduates find it impossible to prosper, especially in the fields of
leisure, retailing, public relations and customer care.
This deficiency has led most of the employers into hiring people with
less education but armed with the desired skills even for management
jobs. Employers say that formal education does not necessarily bring the
desired skills such fields demand.
The belief that more education will bring youth more opportunities
for employment has led them towards their determination to get into
universities. The idea that we live in a "knowledge economy" has
strengthened that notion. But, increasingly, employers are realizing
that education plays a smaller role in social mobility than it used to
in earlier times. The impact of education on social mobility is
declining.
That's happening for two reasons.
Part of the job of higher education is to send the essential signal
to employers, that it enabled its subjects to learn to think, persevere,
absorb information and present ideas. But as the intake of children into
schools is increasing at exponential rates the quality of teaching in
urban, crowded schools are declining. At the same time, increasingly,
the qualities that children should acquire at school are missing.
That are the skills that private schools induce in children in
well-disciplined and managed circumstances. They allow their children to
take part in sports, drama, associations, social work etc. So they
acquire the essential skills such as articulacy, confidence and
smartness at their school age. In government schools, sometimes even
with the facilities, children shy away from such activities and
sacrifice their pleasure for mere book learning.
Most of the prestigious global enterprises admit non-graduates for
their graduate trainee schemes. Concentrating mainly on inter-personal
skills, awareness, attitude and eagerness to learn, such enterprises
recruit only well rounded individuals who are successful in their social
lives as well as professional lives.
Apart from being fluent in the theory, jargon and the technique, they
expect them to come across well and build relationships vital for the
service sector. As a result, even for the middle level management they
stipulate less educational qualifications nowadays. As such skills as
communication and team working are vital in performing at their best,
employers sacrifice educational qualifications that can be acquired at a
later stage. Further, appearance, good manners, character, and
presentation also matter much.
The ability to adapt also counts. The ability to interact with the
class of people you are expected to be familiar with is also important.
You will do better if you are familiar with their style, manners etc. So
gracefulness in attitude is really critical to perform at your best.
This is not to undervalue your hard earned, impressive degree. But
with the forces of globalization, the skills spectrum has changed a lot,
and it demands people who possess talents that are of real commercial
use. Even though, we see it as nepotism, it is just a safe selection
from the people with whom they are familiar with. Employers know what
they want, and, basically, they don't want to fail.
Therefore, at school and in the university, we must encourage them to
develop just these skills. You must learn to speak in a businesslike way
and to that small talk when needed.
|