Balasingham, a foil for Prabhakaran
APOLOGY: Recently, when the chief negotiator of the LTTE, Anton
Balasingham, supposedly apologised for the assassination of former
Indian Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi, one of the questions raised in the
highest Indian circles was whether he represented the voice of supremo
Velupillai Prabhakaran.
It was felt that Balasingham could be voicing his personal opinion,
and the interview he gave to the Indian TV channel might well be a
desperate individual initiative to reach out to India at a critical time
in the history of the LTTE when it was facing international isolation.
A related assumption was that in the LTTE, divergent opinions, views,
and proposals could be publicly expressed.
But keen observers of the LTTE say that these assumptions and
theories are erroneous.
The truth, according to them, is that no one in the LTTE ever
publicly airs his personal views, and that on the question of Rajiv
Gandhi's assassination, Balasingham had only aired Prabhakaran's view,
the one and only view in the LTTE.
Prabhakaran had said in his epoch making press conference in
Kilinochchi on April 10, 2002, that he considered Rajiv Gandhi's
assassination a "tragic event" and sought a rapprochement with India
saying that the past should be forgotten.
The Tiger chieftain had cleverly dodged the question, which was,
whether he would apologise to India for assassinating its leader.
What Balasingham said in the TV interview four years down the line,
was pretty much the same. Neither Balasingham nor Prabhakaran had
admitted to the crime or apologised for it. The way the April 10, 2002
press conference was conducted showed how close the two were, and how
identical their views were.
When journalists bombarded Prabhakaran with questions, Balasingham,
the supposed translator, interjected and brazenly declared that he would
take the questions.
And when a foreign journalist protested, he declared: "My views and
Prabhakaran's views are the same!" Very significantly, there was not a
whimper of protest from the chieftain.
Different but complementary This, of course, does not mean that
Balasingham and Prabhakaran have no differences or have had no serious
differences. But they have always made up, never bringing the
differences out into the open.
Balasingham and Prabhakaran are completely different from each other,
but they complement each other. Balasingham does what Prabhakaran
cannot, and Prabhakaran does what Balasingham cannot.
Both are wedded to the core values, goals and techniques of the LTTE,
though allowances are made for differences on peripheral matters.
And there has been a remarkable consistency. Others may have come and
gone, but Balasingham has been with Prabhakaran, and that, in the inner
circle, right from 1979, when the LTTE was still in its infancy.
Balasingham has the unique distinction of being the leader of the
LTTE's negotiating team on every occasion barring the talks with the JR
Jayewardene government in Thimpu in Bhutan in 1985; and the meeting with
the Nordic monitors in Oslo on June 8 and 9, this year.
He could not go for the Oslo talks this time because of ill-health.
And during the Thimpu talks, he was on the hotline acting as a link
between Prabhakaran and the LTTE delegation.
Writing about the Balasingham-Prabhakaran relationship in her book'
The Will to Freedom' (Fairmax Publishing Ltd Mitcham, England, 2001) his
wife Adele Balasingham says: "The relationship between these two
single-minded individuals has been unique.
It is one of those relationships where two different personalities
come together at a specific conjuncture and play significant roles in
the movement of history."
While Balasingham is the philosopher and the theoretician of the
movement, Prabhakaran is the quintessential activist, and also the final
decision maker.
Balasingham is the negotiator, with a preference for peaceful methods
of conflict resolution based on compromise and step-by-step movement.
But Prabhakaran, the warrior, pitches for the extreme and is
uncompromising. But there has been a fruitful division of labour between
the two, by mutual, tacit consent.
"Bala" as Adele refers to him in her book, is the political
interpreter or translator of the LTTE's actions to the outside world, a
tough task now, given the global hostility towards violent non-state
actors and terrorists.
He is the interface with the genteel world, given his felicity with
the English language, the gift of the gap, his wide reading, and his
academic and journalistic background.
He is adept at handling political leaders, heads of governments,
officials and journalists from across the globe.
In arguments, Balasingham can be reasonable and persuasive as well as
intimidating, carping, and sarcastic when the occasion demands.
Prabhakaran, on the other hand, is shy and retiring. He speaks only
Tamil. He also has strong views. But he determines the basic goals of
the organisation, its basic strategies and tactics and is entirely
in-charge of the military aspect of it.
Despite his privileged and unique place in the set up, Balasingham
has never overstepped his limits and has always worked within the
unwritten parameters of his relationship with the supremo.
"Bala has always viewed his role with the LTTE and the struggle as
the advisor and theoretician to Pirabakaran and the organisation,"
writes Adele.
In line with the Tamil way, Adele spells the Supremo's name as "Pirabakaran"
and not "Prabhakaran" as it is spelled generally in line with the
Sanskrit original.
Balasingham has scrupulously avoided military matters because these
are sensitive. In such matters, he will wait for Prabhakaran to brief
him. And according to Adele, Prabhakaran would unfailingly brief him so
that the required press releases could be written and the concerns of
the outside world addressed.
Role of trust "Trust" has been the basis of the relationship between
the two.
Though holed up in a jungle hideout in the Wanni in North Sri Lanka,
with little or no interaction with the world outside, Prabhakaran has
never felt insecure vis-…-vis Balasingham, who, living in the UK for
years, has the skills to interact with outsiders and has been in close
touch with them.
Prabhakaran has never feared that Balasingham may be weaned away from
the fundamentals of the LTTE by "pernicious" outside influences.
"Bala's lack of concern for power, his preparedness to restrain his
role to writing, teaching and advising, and his obvious commitment to
the struggle, eventually made Bala the most reliable and trustworthy
advisor to Pirabakaran," writes Adele.
Balasingham's willingness to speak the truth as he sees it, is
appreciated by Prabhakaran. He will not utter a falsehood, simply to
please Prabhakaran.
On this Adele writes: "One quality that Pirabakaran has admired and
valued in Bala all these years, is his commitment to truth. Bala has
always acted on the principle that he should convey accurate and
truthful advice in the best interests of both Pirabakaran and the
struggle."
"Whether Pirbakaran has always heeded the advice or was displeased by
what he frankly conveyed, was not Bala's concern." "As the advisor to
Pirabakaran, Bala has many times told me, it was his duty to tell the
truth, regardless of how unpalatable it may be."
Academic orientation Balasingham has had an academic orientation
right from the earliest days unlike Prabhakaran who quit formal
education at 16 and has had some disdain for conceptualisation and
theorisation.
Though born Christian, Balasingham took to the Hindu Vedantic
philosophy in the early days. And many Sinhala Buddhists will be
surprised to learn that he was strongly attracted to Buddhism and had
gone about giving lectures on it.
Later, while in the UK, he read widely on Western philosophy and
Marxism and enrolled for a doctorate on a comparison of Marx and Freud.
But he could not complete the thesis because of his involvement with
exiles from the Third World who were fighting for liberation.
Very soon, he found that Marxism had to be tempered by the ethnic
dimension if the Sri Lankan situation had to be fully and correctly
grasped.
According to Adele, he found that a pure Marist analysis would not be
able to explain the core concerns of Jaffna Tamil society, steeped as it
was (and still is) in Hinduism, Tamil culture and history, and the caste
system.
Balasingham lectured to young Tamil arm chair revolutionaries and
wrote tracts on the guerilla campaigns of Che Guevara and Mao. He wrote
pamphlets on the Sri Lankan Tamil issue also, putting it in a conceptual
framework.
Before long, these works attracted the attention of Prabhakaran who
was then living in exile in Chennai, India. Prabhakaran expressed a wish
to see him and Balasingham and Adele journeyed to Chennai in 1979.The
link established then, has remained unbroken till date.
"Although they liked each other from the outset, it took many years
for both to cultivate a unique friendship based on profound mutual
understanding," writes Adele. Prabhakaran had by then seen the need to
impart to his cadres a knowledge of larger social, economic and
political issues.
These were necessary for developing a commitment to the Tamil cause,
which was larger than just setting up an independent Tamil Eelam by
force of arms, he felt. Balasingham was assigned the task of giving
orientation lectures.
Personal advisor Within a few years of interaction, Balasingham had
become a close personal confidante of Prabhakaran's.
When Prabhakaran fell in love with Madhivadhani, a young recruit from
Jaffna, and wanted to marry her, but was constrained by the norm that
cadres should not marry or have sexual relations, Balasingham argued for
a change in the normative system to accord with nature, and got
Prabhakaran to change the rules.
It is noteworthy that Balasingham has always accepted the final
judgment of Prabhakaran on any matter. He has had implicit faith in
Prabhakaran's intuition and felt that the leader has been right every
time.
In his book War and Peace (Fairmax Publishing Ltd. Mitcham, England,
2004) Balasingham gives a telling example.
He says that just prior to the signing of the India-Sri Lanka Accord
on July 27, 1987, Indian Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi had proposed a
"secret pact" with the LTTE in a last ditch effort to secure
Prabhakaran's consent.
He promised to give the LTTE a dominant position in the proposed
Interim Administrative Council of the new North Eastern Province; wink
at a token surrender of arms; and grant Indian Rupees five million
monthly to help the LTTE maintain its cadres in lieu of the right to
levy taxes.
Despite pressure from the Tamil Nadu Minister Panrutti Ramachandran
on Prabhakaran to enter into the secret pact, the LTTE Supremo was glum.
Later, he told Balasingham that he did not trust the Indians, and had no
faith in their promises, whether written or unwritten.
According to Balasingham, subsequent events proved that Prabhakaran
was right because New Delhi seemed to be doing the bidding of the JR
Jayewardene government in regard to the implementation of the 1987
Accord.
Toes the Prabhakaran line In all negotiations and dealings with the
Jayawardene government and the successor governments of R.Premadasa,
Chandrika Kumaratunga, Ranil Wickremesinghe and Mahinda Rajapaksa,
Balasingham has invariably followed the line laid by Prabhakaran.
Many in Sri Lanka and India like to believe that Balasingham is a
moderate and that Prabhakaran is the extremist - the real hindrance to
any compromise or settlement.
Balasingham is often quoted as saying informally to members of Sri
Lankan peace delegations that it will be better to settle the Tamil
issue while he is around, because the likely successors at the
negotiating take are confirmed extremists.
But keen watchers of the LTTE feel that this may be a ploy to get the
Sri Lankan state and the international community to blindly accept the
LTTE's demands.
Many in Sri Lanka and abroad like to believe that Prabhakaran was
very angry with Balasingham's decision to sign the "Oslo Declaration" of
2002 wherein the LTTE supposedly agreed to find a "federal" solution
within a united Sri Lanka.
There was speculation that the supremo might appoint a new chief
negotiator.
But no change took place, because the Oslo Declaration was nothing
but an expression of an interest on the part of the two parties in
trying to find a federal solution. It was not a commitment to finding a
federal solution.
What was committed to did not run counter to Prabhakaran's stated
policy. In speech after speech on November 27 every year, the Tiger
Chieftain has said that the LTTE will consider any proposal that may
satisfy the needs and aspirations of the Sri Lankan Tamils.
Earlier, in the later 1980s, during the talks with President
Premadasa, the LTTE's delegation led by Balasingham agreed to stand for
elections to the North Eastern Provincial Council (NEPC).
This surprised Adele. And when she asked Balasingham whether this was
not compromising the LTTE's rejection of the Sri Lankan state and its
institutions, he said that by seeking this alternative, the LTTE would
not lose anything.
It would only help promote the cause of establishing Tamil Eelam.
Adele quotes Balasingham as saying that if the Tigers won the
elections, they would transform the concepts of Tamil homeland and Tamil
nationhood into concrete realities, which were their declared ideals.
Far from acting differently, Balasingham has unwaveringly and
effectively furthered his supremo's objectives in areas assigned to him.
(PK Balachandran is Special Correspondent of Hindustan Times in Sri
Lanka)
Courtesy:
www.hindustantimes.com |