Compelling need to control 'Wild Cat' strikes
SQN, Ldr. J. T. Rex Fernando (S.L.A.F. Retd)
WILD CAT STRIKES: During the last few months we have witnessed a
surfeit of strikes, demonstrations, protest marches and fasts, while
posters have come up and the buildings and walls of some institutions
have been plastered with slogans, some demanding salary increases,
permanency for those on temporary and casual employment and others
additional employment benefits.
University violence has added its own band of dissent at a time the
country is seeking desperately to come out of its dismal economic morass
while directing its energies to restore peace while combating a ruthless
and intransigent enemy.
While the Government efforts towards a sustainable peace and national
development are adversely affected by the crippling strikes, the
greatest amount of difficulty is to the ordinary and often marginalised
people.
It is on this background that the Transport Minister A. H. M. Fowzie
considering the unenviable predicament of the ordinary people of this
country who are suffering grave hardships as a result of wild cat
strikes, recently suggested to the public to institute legal action
against the striking workers for delectation of duty.
While Mr. Fowzie's suggestion should be considered seriously pursuing
collective action by the people is a considerable task and the setting
of the necessary infrastructure for such course of action will take
sometime.
However, there is an immediate need for the Government to review the
Labour Laws and Industrial Relations policies to introduce suitable
legislation to prevent 'Wild Cat Strikes' and that irresponsible and
conscienceless trade unions and other agitational forces do not act
against national interests and virtually hold the country to ransom.
The recent strikes have unmistakably manifested the helplessness of
the public and the adverse effects on security operations and the morale
of the forces.
It is timely to consider the moral obligations of trade unions
towards society and the need for effective legislation to regulate
unions particularly in essential services.
Responsibilities of unions
A trade union is an organisation of workers formed to promote,
protect and improve through collective action, the social, economic and
political interests of its members.
While the philosophies of trade unions have gradually changed with
the time, Trade Unions are essential entities in any democratic country
and should be encouraged to represent the voice of the workers.
They provide the perfect forum for workers to project their demands
and the most effective vehicle to interact with the employers.
In Sri Lanka, Trade Unions which were formed to protect the common
interests of workers have regrettably become tools in the hands of power
seeking selfish individuals.
Regrettably these individuals have not hesitated to sacrifice the
interest of the country and the workers, by launching 'wild cat'
strikes. Regrettably trade unions are no longer democratic organisations.
Most of them are run by a Mafia with no internal democracy.
Devastating effect
In Sri Lanka a strike is generally considered a legal weapon and the
only curbs are under the collective agreements, which could totally
prohibit strike action or restrict action to particular sections in
times of emergencies proclaimed under the Industrial Dispute Act and the
Public Security Ordinance to declare certain services essential.
Unfortunately sections of so called pubic servants appear to have
become so insensitive, if not senseless, that they have used the weapon
as the first option disregarding all norms of trade unionism.
The unkindest cut is that drastic consequences of such 'wild cat'
strikes have imposed upon the poor, innocent and in the context of the
recent wild cat strikes launched by the doctors and certain sections of
the Ceylon Electricity Board, Railway Employees, Para - Medic and the
hospital minor staff.
It is timely and relevant to consider the consequences of the major
strikes in the public sector during the past few years.
Whether these strikes were justifiable, the effect of these on the
economy, and the hardship and the inconvenience caused to the public
cannot be adequately explained and assessed.
There is a compelling need to consider what effective measures should
be taken to prevent or at least curtail these 'wild cat' strikes, in
greater interest of the country and its people. While the country is
virtually burning the trade unions are vigorously and persisting with
their demands.
GMOA
The Government Medical Officer's Association struck work to protest
against the failure to rectify the salary anomalies. Despite the
Government giving an assurance, the doctors persisted with their strike
action for considerable period.
Is it justifiable for a professional body engaged in a humanitarian
service to resort to strike action considering the inconvenience and
difficulties caused to thousands of poor patients who opt for non fee
levying State hospitals due to their inability to pay for their
treatment, causing immense suffering to the people, particularly the
poor who were devastated by the tsunami.
CEB/ Railways
The CEB and the Railways have been regularly threatening strike
action on various issues.
The material and human costs of such callous, precipitate action
which was also accompanied by acts of sabotage and vandalism is
enormous.
The June 1996 CEB strike, will not be erased from the public mind.
Apart from the financial loss of over 800 million, the other damages and
the hardships to the public could not be easily assessed.
The unions callously disregarding all trade union norms used the 'privatisation'
issue as a means of mobilising the rank and file behind them to carry
out this unjustifiable struggle. The tremendous inconvenience to railway
commuters' consequent to the strike by railway employees cannot be
adequately explained or assessed.
Essential services
Is it justifiable for public sector employees in essential services
like power, water, transport and health to have a right to strike even
if they have a trade union dispute? Many democratic countries do not
even legally recognise the right to strike, particularly of those
engaged in essential services.
In the context of the strikes we have and are experiencing in the
public sector, it may be necessary, apart from invoking the Essential
Services Order to consider new regulations to prevent those public
sector employees in 'Essential Services' from resorting to strike
action. There is a compelling need to review the existing Labour Laws
with a view to enact new laws to prevent 'wild cat strikes'.
Sri Lanka is a free country and trade unions enjoy unrestricted
liberties. In fact Sri Lanka has a surfeit of Labour regulations not
found in any other part of the world.
From an analytical study of most strikes of recent times, it can be
asserted with a degree of certainty most of these strikes are without
justification, for frivolous reasons, some politically motivated and
others manipulated by outsiders.
It is not trade unionism to resort to strike action for the slightest
grievance, which should be the ultimate weapon when negotiations fail.
The 'Cart before the horse' policy striking first and negotiating later
is alien to trade unionism.
Public sector
In most countries, public sector employees are allowed to resort to
strike action in specific circumstances, essentially for matters
relating to their employment. But restrictions are imposed to ensure
that there is no disruption of the essential services.
The decision to strike in these countries must be necessarily by
secret ballot. It is advisable to set out clearly under what
circumstances public sector employees can strike and how such decision
should be made. There must be secret ballot before strikes are called
and the membership must ballot for a strike.
The so called lighting strikes, sudden strikes without notice should
be banned by law. Trade union leaders should be made personally
responsible for losses and damage not only to the employers but also to
third parties.
Need to regulate
The patience the country had displayed so far in running thin
particularly in respect of the strike by and those in essential
services.
Unless some meaningful action is taken to rid the country of strikes
for frivolous reasons by the public sector trade unions, the day will
not be too far when those given to 'wild cat strikes' will be strong
enough to paralyze the whole country.
The Government should bring in new regulations to regulate strikes in
the public sector without depending essentially on the Emergency
Regulations and Public Security Ordinance.
Immunity
In no democratic country are trade unions which resort to violence
tolerated. In every country which grants trade union immunity from civil
action lays down that where union members resort to violence of damage
to employers' property, they forfeit such immunity.
The trade unions are set up under the Trade Unions Ordinance and are
given legal rights and immunity there under but equally they have to
abide by the laws of the country and members are liable to be dealt with
for alleged acts like every other citizen.
If strikes could be avoided, hundreds of thousands of useful working
hours would be saved. Productivity will increase, foreign investors
would have a greater faith and rush in investments. The Government will
be able to direct its efforts and resources to resolve the ethnic
conflict.
The country by large would benefit, to ensure industrial harmony it
is necessary more than ever before to effectively regulate the trade
unions particularly when even professional bodies act without any sense
of responsibility.
Public concern
The public cannot be expected to sit back and watch trade unions
launch 'wild cat' strikes with monotonous regularity.
They too have a right to voice their grievances and the right to
protect their interest as do strikers, if not more so, particularly when
it involves highly essential services, such as electricity, water,
health, and transport.
The poor have already suffered much from 'wild cat strikes',
particularly in the health sector. Both the Government and trade unions
of various sectors must act responsibly and work out collective
agreements for industrial peace.
The just grievances of workers being exploited by political parties
out of power to destabilise or throw out incumbent governments have been
the bane of this country.
Working out collective agreements will take time till then the
Government and trade unions must compromise and reach a settlement that
should be fair to both sides in the context of the present state of the
economy the cost of living and the ethnic conflict.
The long suffering public do not want to be further inconvenienced by
regular strikes even if it be for a day.
|