The spectre of Sinhala nationalist terrorism
Rohini Hensman
PROVOCATIONS: The LTTE scored a major victory in April. The
only way its leadership can convince the majority of Tamils and the
international community that it is relevant is by demonstrating that
Tamils are being oppressed in Sri Lanka with government collusion.
That is why so many of their actions are aimed at provoking reprisals
against Tamil civilians. Over the past ten years, several provocations
of this sort failed to achieve their objective. Even the attack on the
Dalada Maligawa did not succeed in provoking anti-Tamil pogroms.
But in mid-April 2006, they finally got what they wanted. They laid a
trap, and the Sinhala chauvinists fell right into it. The marketplace
bomb in Trincomalee was followed by violence against innocent Tamils,
just as the LTTE had wanted.
Worse still, reports by Human Rights Watch suggest that state
security forces stood by and watched while innocent people were
attacked, and may even have participated in the violence. Since
'terrorism' is defined as 'violence or the threat of violence against
unarmed civilians in the pursuit of a political objective', these
attacks on Tamil civilians were just as much acts of terrorism as the
bombing of the market.
Shameful echoes of July 1983
It was state-sponsored terrorism on a much larger scale, carried out
under J.R.Jayawardene's government, which started the civil war that has
led to a de facto division of our country. Let us be very clear about
this: it is the Sinhala chauvinists who first started dividing our
country; the LTTE only followed in their footsteps. Even today, Sinhala
nationalists share the responsibility for dividing the country with the
LTTE.
If Mahinda Rajapaksa's government wants the war to go on for another
twenty years, and the country to remain divided, all it has to do is to
let Sinhala nationalists carry on with their dirty work. Many Tamils who
are not supporters of the LTTE will conclude that the bad old days are
back, and it is better to have the Tigers posing resistance to an
oppressive regime rather than having no resistance at all.
The alternative is to take prompt action to bring the Sinhalese thugs
to justice, and - equally important - to apologise to their victims and
offer them compensation which will allow them to rebuild their lives to
the maximum extent possible.
Violence against civilians in government-controlled areas is a
failure for which the government must take responsibility and make
amends: it is the duty of the government to protect all its citizens -
whether they be Sinhalese, Tamil, Muslim, or anything else - from
criminal violence. Strong action against all members of the security
forces who were guilty of a dereliction of duty, by failing to stop the
violence or by participating in it, is also called for.
Does this mean that government troops have to be sitting ducks when
the LTTE targets them? Not at all. Self-defence is no offence, and any
action carefully targeting those responsible for bomb and mine attacks
would be appropriate.
It would be possible to justify these measures to other Tamils and
the international community by explaining that the troops were acting in
self-defence. Even if they lead to full-scale war, it could be argued
that the war was started by the LTTE.
However, there is no justification whatsoever for attacks on unarmed
Tamil civilians; indeed, this is a war crime as well as an act of
terrorism.
Responsibility for such crimes does not lie with the perpetrators
alone; it goes up the chain of command, through those who sponsor such
actions, to the very top of the government. Unless Mahinda Rajapaksa
wants to join the infamous ranks of Sri Lankan war criminals, he must
ensure that all those who went on the rampage and those who sponsored
them are punished, and that such incidents never happen again.
This is also the only way to end the war and unite the country. So
long as Tamils feel that the government does not protect them, the LTTE
will retain its power, the war will go on, and the country will remain
divided.
The Barbaric Doctrine of Collective Guilt and Collective Punishment.
The President stated that Tamil, Sinhalese and Muslim civilians were
killed in the bomb blast, in addition to one soldier. In other words,
Tamils were among the victims. Yet his Special Defence Advisor,
H.M.G.B.Kotakadeniya, justified the subsequent attacks on Tamils by
saying that if the LTTE trigger an incident, "there'll be
repercussions".
This statement betrays gross stupidity as well as shocking brutality.
According to his logic, if some innocent Tamil civilians are killed in a
bomb blast, other innocent Tamil civilians are bound to be attacked in
reprisal! What sense does that make?
Such a statement only makes sense if one buys into the barbaric
doctrine of collective punishment. According to this, if one Tamil is
guilty of a crime, then all Tamils can be punished, even if they have
absolutely nothing to do with it, simply because they happen to belong
to the same community.
This doctrine is shared equally by Sinhala chauvinists and the LTTE,
and is used to justify acts of terrorism by both, whether it is a bomb
blast or reprisal attacks on civilians. The government will fall flat on
its face if it tries to get support from the international community
against LTTE terrorism while anyone can point out that its own members
justify and perhaps even sponsor Sinhala nationalist terrorism!
Unfortunately, it is not only the Sinhala chauvinists who buy into
the doctrine of collective guilt. In their own way, Sinhalese liberals
and NGO members who propagate the fiction that the LTTE is the sole
representative of the Tamil people of Sri Lanka do the same thing.
To claim that the LTTE represents all Tamils amounts to putting
forward the proposition that all Tamils are responsible for what the
LTTE does: precisely the same barbaric doctrine that the Sinhala
chauvinists propagate. Unless and until these people change their tune
and acknowledge that the LTTE represents only a minority of the Tamil
people of Sri Lanka, they too share responsibility for attacks on
innocent Tamil civilians.
All these people, and above all the government, must make it very
clear that there is a sharp distinction between the LTTE and the
majority of the Tamil people of Sri Lanka, and the latter must not be
punished for the simple fact that they are Tamil.
Punishing the real culprits, whether Sinhalese or Tamil, would
require proper criminal investigation and prosecution of those who are
guilty. If this is not done, it means that the government of Sri Lanka
does not even govern the territory it already controls - in which case,
what is the point of fighting for the territory currently under LTTE
occupation?
The government already has a difficult task counteracting LTTE
propaganda which portrays it as anti-Tamil. Foreigners - including
mediapersons who ought to know better - still associate Sri Lanka with
the terrible human rights violations against Tamils that took place some
time ago. They are not aware of changes that have taken place over the
past decade or so, and are therefore only too ready to believe LTTE
propaganda.
Counteracting LTTE propaganda
It is important to convince foreign governments that Tamils are not
being oppressed in Sri Lanka, and that the government is committed to
protecting the human and democratic rights of all its citizens, because
their assistance is needed to stop the flow of funds to the LTTE. Even a
single instance of retaliatory violence against Tamil civilians can be a
huge boost to the LTTE propaganda machine.
Unless the government (a) acknowledges that such an attack has taken
place, (b) pledges an enquiry into the violence and punishment of the
culprits, (c) carries out its promise, and (d) purges itself and its
armed forces from top to bottom of all those who condone Sinhala
nationalist terrorism, it would be guilty of aiding and abetting the
violence, thus providing further ammunition to the LTTE.
All those in Sri Lanka who are committed to peace with justice must
put pressure on the government to undertake these actions and thus
counteract the negative publicity generated by the shameful events of
April.
The election of Sri Lanka to the UN Human Rights Council shows that
some progress has been made in convincing governments around the world
that Sri Lanka is now committed to the protection of human rights, but
there is still a long way to go. Ruling out attacks on Tamil civilians
is a critical component in winning the propaganda war. |