Education: Education plays an important role in moulding the
character. No arguments. It is a fact. The law expects every child to
receive education. If one cannot go the full round at least cover the
minimum, primary education.
In the Asian Region, Sri Lanka is able to keep her head high with
modest pride as more than 90 per cent her populi is able to read and
write.
Our education system has its roots in the Temples and the "Guru
Gedara" of the yesteryears. The children learnt the first lessons of
their lives at the foot of the `Guru' who is held in high esteem.
Times have passed. Systems have seen the unavoidable change. Three
major foreign powers ruled Sri Lanka. The Portuguese, The Dutch and the
English within a period of approximately five decades ruled this
country.
They implanted their values and traditions. Each of them made it a
point to impart basics of education. This transformed pirivena
education. Centres begun under watchful of eye of the Catholic and
Christian clergy provided education that went beyond the portal of the
Sri Lanka and opened the world before their students.
They studied not only their mother tongue but also studied foreign
languages specially English. This gave rise to a new society and that
itself helped those came afterwards to realise that Sri Lanka was under
foreign domain and needed to be freed. This consciousness was a result
of in depth education not only of the land one is born into, but of the
world beyond our reach.
With Independence, Free Education was introduced and the Nation
salutes the hero behind the scheme Christopher William Wijekoon
Kannangara as the Father of Free Education. He had to face many
challenges and rivalries in introducing the Bill on Free Education,
because the bourgeoisie did not like the proletariat learning.
Introducing the Bill for Free Education scheme C.W.W. had this to say
to the Members of the State Council in 1946 : "If I did not get a
scholarship, a poor person like me would never have received higher
education. It is this fact that made me give each and every child this
boon and this was my only aim."
The bill was passed on October 06, 1946. Thus he made Education a
responsibility of the State, the Government.
Once the Bill was passed by the State Council he said with modest
pride : "I have opened the book of education which was closed up to now.
Education which was a privilege of the few, is now the privilege of all.
I have removed all obstacles that work against the population receiving
education".
It was his ardent wish that all children got the opportunity of
attending school. "To provide education freely whereas it was available
only at a higher price. Education treated hitherto as a closed book, to
be converted to be an open letter. Education which was a legacy of the
affluent to be converted to be an inheritance of the poor". That was the
cardinal principle in his life that led him to introduce the scheme of
free education.
A recent news report in the Daily News said that over 3,000 children
in the Central Province do not attend school. The fact is that not only
in the Central Province but also in very many places children do not
attend school for some reason or another. Although the law expects
parents to send their children to schools, poverty and the like would
have prevented them attending to school. Added to these reasons the
system of enrolment adopted in the recent past has contributed directly
to keep the child away from school.
In the days when we were young, our parents had no problem of
enroling the children to the school nearby and there was no competition
at the time where you need to fight `tooth and nail' to see that your
child is admitted to a popular school.
There was no class distinction or ` good schools : bad schools'
concept.
They were schools run by the Churches, by the Temples or Buddhist
Organisations like the Paramavinggnartha Samagama. The teachers were
good, dedicated and God fearing and they saw the profession as a special
vocation.
But the scene has completely changed today. Parents suffer from
enigma and they have to go from pillar to post to prove their residence
in a place nearest the school.
The parents if they want to send the child to a school of their
choice because of its popularity or the next neighbour's child goes to
that school or does not want to send his/her son because the neighbour's
child attend the same, go about looking for an ideal place to suit the
child's future needs.
This is the sordid scenario we see and we hear about when it is time
to make your application to send one's child to school next year. The
distinctions made by the authorities, the establishment of National
schools, and inability of the Education Ministry to distribute good,
dedicated and qualified teachers evenly among all the schools have
heavily contributed to competition and other evils.
If all the schools have good, qualified and dedicated teachers,
parents need not run looking for the `so called good schools'.
The present Education Minister Susil Premajayantha is a man who is
down to earth. He could one day be proud if he acts to fulfil the dream
of C.W.W. Kannangara, who introduced free education to the poor sons and
daughters of the soil.
If he is serious about giving equal opportunity and sound education
to all, the first thing he should do is to introduce a new law that
children up to grade five should attend a school close to their
home-town. Let those schools in the village have good and qualified
teachers to stop the hunt for `good schools'.
Depoliticise the present education system. Free the teachers from the
political bondage they are trapped in. Let them not go behind
politicians for their due promotions. Recruit good and qualified
teachers to the profession.
Remove and expel those unworthy of the profession or those who have
taken the profession because there was nothing else to do. Recognise the
good service done by the dedicated teachers and make them a`Role Model"
for others who join the profession, looking at it not merely as a source
of income but as a service to the nation. Act now and it is never too
late. |