There is no way a layman can reason out for himself whether coconut
oil is good or bad for him especially when differing views are expressed
by specialists in this field. Here is one way of looking at it. It does
not need any medical knowledge.
Every human being is nurtured by the environment he lives in. From
the moment of inception he is nurtured by the nutrients the mother takes
in the form of whatever she eats, drinks and inhales from the
environment.
After birth, the newborn is first given milk produced by the mother
or by a cow or goat which is also from the same environment and then the
newborn after being weaned out of milk takes what the mother takes.
The human being is therefore a product of the environment. He does
not live separately from the environment. He is part and parcel of the
environment.
On that reasoning whatever food is available in the environment
cannot be bad for a human being because that is what sustains him. It
therefore does not stand to reason why corn oil which is found in the
natural environment of the United States and other countries is better
for a Sri Lankan than the coconut oil in his own natural environment.
We therefore can understand why coconut oil cannot be good for those
whose natural environment has no coconut trees.
We also can understand why tests carried out on such persons using
coconut oil will show unfavourable results.
Let us consider the environment we grew up in. In that environment we
who think of ourselves as a self and an entity separate from anything
outside our physical bodies find it hard to realize for example that
everything that we see with their eyes is a part of ourselves because
without that, one of our vital faculties namely vision does not exist.
Similar reasoning applies to sounds, smells, tastes, body
sensitivity, etc.
Also since others see the same things that we see, hear the same
things that we hear, etc., they also are a part of what we are a part
of. That means all human beings including animals are linked through
these objects.
If that is agreed then the concept of an entity called a self or a
soul that exists uniquely by itself apart from others and with no
connection to others, becomes totally untenable. Therefore all of us
including animals are an integral part of the environment we live in and
any food that is naturally found in our environment cannot be bad for
us.
It is now scientifically accepted that everything that we and the
environment consists of was all synthesized in the star furnaces and we
will all be going back to cosmic dust from which new stars will be born
to keep continuity for ever.
It would now be reasonable to examine whether there is a difference
in the level of heart disease between the Jaffna peasants who use local
palm oil and not imported oils and the Sinhalese peasants who use
coconut oil and not imported oils.
We could also examine whether the Inuit (disparagingly referred to as
the Eskimos) who live in the arctic and eat seal meat which is very high
in fat content has more incidence of heart disease than others.
L. JAYASOORIYA - via e-mail
To put Mahinda Chinthana into practice we need money. Printing of
money and borrowing from banks will lead to inflation and devaluation of
the rupee. We must avoid that. It is common knowledge that Sri Lanka is
a Tax evaders' paradise. It is my guess that between Rs. 100 billion to
200 billion is lost to the State yearly due to corrupt practices.
It is too important a source of revenue to be left in the hands of
the corrupt, lethargic, indifferent and negligent bureaucracy - Customs,
Inland Revenue and Excise Departments.
We must find a new mechanism to collect the all important Taxes. Even
the VAT that is collected from the customers are not remitted to the
State by some of the crooked businessmen. They maintain two sets of
books.
We should also check the profit and loss A/C and the balance sheets
of the big companies although they are certified by qualified
accountants. We saw how tens of millions of rupees were poured into to
spread false propaganda against our Presidential Candidate in the
recently concluded Presidential Election by the big names in the
business community.
When talking about the business community the names of Enron World
com Tyco of USA, Yukos of Russia, Live-door of Japan comes to mind. How
the bosses of these companies falsified the accounts and played out the
shareholders and the State are known to the world business community.
Now, most of them are serving time in prisons.
The doctors, lawyers and the traders who earn millions of rupees
yearly but do not pay taxes should be brought into the net. Recently I
read in a newspaper that some personnel of the Treasury and the Central
Bank had come into a lot of praise.
I do not know why they have failed and failed miserably, to do their
job to collect the taxes and also inform the President that the
percentage of Sri Lankans tax collection is less than most of the other
countries.
Because of this, we have to go on our bended knees to obtain loans
from the World Financial Institutions get lectured by petty officials of
the same Institutions and to the erosion of our sovereignty.
A few days back the newly elected President of Siberia dismissed the
entire personnel of the Financial Ministry numbering 300 due to
corruption. Other countries also have this problem, but they try to
solve this by speedy trial and harsh prison sentences. The richest man -
owner of Yakos oil company in Russia is serving a prison sentence of 9
1/2 years for Tax fraud.
Lakshman Karunaratne - Rajagiriya
It is obvious that some of the so called big players in our
relatively small corporate world do not have the foggiest idea about the
role they are expected to play in their positions. A director of a
public corporation is holding in trust the interests of its many
stakeholders. When these stakeholders observe their directors moving
irresponsibly into our tumultuous political arena they are naturally
filled with anxiety.
I must say that generally we do not see directors of respected
corporations such as John Keells Holdings and Hayleys dabble in
day-to-day politics. It maybe that the training they receive at these
old institutions stops them from indulging in partisan political
activity.
These companies are founded on solid values and sound principles. The
directors of these institutions are trained not to become public showmen
and thereby expose their company to risk and ridicule.
The situation is quite different if a company is privately owned and
the owner wants to indulge in politics. If by going into politics he is
found to be in a position of isolation from public opinion and trends in
society, then the consequences he will face himself. If he loses some
business by indulging in his political whims it is the owner's problem.
It may be that due to the inevitable downturn of business some of his
employees may lose their jobs. But that is his own business and we
cannot deny the owner the freedom to do politics of his choice.
I have observed with some trepidation the actions of a head of a
publicly quoted local bank for sometime now. I happen to hold a
considerable amount of shares in this bank. When this gentleman started
appearing on political platforms of a candidate at the last presidential
elections some of us shareholders in fact wrote to the company
expressing our concern.
This part-time politician not only appeared on these political
platforms but also seems to enjoy making very partisan sounding speeches
in support of this candidate. For the record, his candidate lost. It was
as if this corporate pundit put his money on a losing horse.
Another sad aspect of these public shows was that the corporate boss
was exposing his somewhat limited familiarity with the English langauge,
his chosen mode of public speaking.
This again does no good to the image of the company. The directors in
all their public appearances and conduct must strive to improve the
company image.
The elections results showed that the general public is not in
agreement with the highly prejudiced views of this gentleman. Where does
this now place the bank, which must continue to do business in this
country?
We like to say to these corporate bosses with political agendas - by
all means; if you want to do politics please do. But do not do politics
while holding office in quoted public companies.
We shareholders who invest our hard-earned money in shares depend on
the performance and the health of the company for a comfortable
retirement. Do not gamble with that.
G. B. MARASINGHE - Colombo 6
Dhanvanthri Private Hospital of Trincomalee
As an ordinary citizen of Trincomalee, it is with a sense of pride
that I state that the Dhanvanthri Private Hospital of Trincomalee adopts
a very high standard of administration, management and monitoring of all
activities in processing and maintaining the health care of the people
of Trincomalee.
This private hospital established a few years ago by a highly
qualified young physican with amiable qualities, is a shining example. I
vouch for this fact through personal experience gained by me as a
patient in this hospital from Feb. 5 to 8, 2006. The medical officers,
nursing staff and the junior support staff are a dedicated lot.
A staff of this calibre is seldom found in institutions of health
care.
SIVA - Trincomalee
Recently over the radio I heard that the Government is going to
introduce a Parliamentary Act that cattle slaughter will be completely
stopped in Sri Lanka. I was really happy to hear about it. Now that JHU
is also in the Parliament, especially a Buddhist country like Sri Lanka
should have taken this decision many years ago.
Even the doctors have found that taking any kind of meat is not good
for health. Human alimentary canal is not formed to eat meat. When these
animals are killed they undergo a lot of stress.
The whole system is changed and there is lot of enzyme changes taking
place, which is bad for human health. In the recent years we have been
facing lot of natural disasters because in this Buddhist country people
are becoming cruel and nasty.
Cattle are such innocent animals, and how much they are useful to
human beings. If the Government enforces a rule not to kill cattle then
we will be blessed forever.
CHANDANI JAYADEVI SAMARASINGHE - Dehiwela
The SLBC has two Tamil services, one National and the other
Commercial. The National Service broadcast is not clearly audible in
Trincomalee. The reception is quite poor and sometimes another broadcast
interferes with it. The Commercial service which is called Thenral is
clearly audible. Even the private radio broadcasts are clearly audible.
The purpose of having a National service is to contribute to the
cultural, literary and political activities of the Tamil speaking
people. Some years back the programs included folk songs, historical and
modern dramas, literary discussions, music expositions, Kathapirasangams
etc. The present day programs have deteriorated in quality and quantity.
On Friday mornings Thirumurai - Tamil religious hymns composed by
Saiva Saints is regularly broadcast for half an hour. This was not
broadcast on February 11. What was broadcast was Sanskrit Slogans.
How many listeners do understand Sanskrit? I am told that no
recording of Thirumurai songs by local artistes had been undertaken for
a number of years. This is a grave injustice to the Hindus.
I trust that this will catch the eyes of the Minister of Mass Media
so that he will look into these shortcomings and ensure that the Tamil
people are served by the SLBC in the same manner as it serves the
Sinhala people.
V. REGUNATHAN - Trincomalee
|