The maze of photojournalism
Dr. Senarath Tennakoon
photojournalism: Even the dead become alive and active. Dreams come
true. The non-existent become realistic and existent. The dead and the
living can exist side by side. With modern technology one's physical
presence and activity can be transferred from one position to another,
through the fine art and science of photography.
Although you were at home on a particular day at a particular time,
your photograph could find its way into a protest march or a
demonstration on a public road. The worst would be when you find
yourself engaged in an amorous act on a sea beach or so!
Sophisticated computer technology which converts an image to pixels,
each of which can be electronically controlled, allows almost anyone to
manipulate photographs convincingly.
In a matter of minutes, two photographs can be combined seamlessly to
give an illusion. A father who died two decades back, can be shown to
walk beside his son in a procession!
In fashion photography, it is now common practice for the model
photographs to be shown with long legs. These effects are produced by
electronic alterations. This act of altering is looked upon as an art or
a science where the viewer is faced with deception. The cornerstone of
reputable photojournalism where veracity counts, becomes a fake being
diluted by deception.
The ethical and moral implications of such deceptive processes could
be devastating, when such practices find their way to newspaper and
magazine journalism and massive financial claims are made over libel
suits in courts of justice.
The ease of manipulation, undetectability, transmissibility, and the
change from analogue to digital are the key features of newly
manipulated photography.
Photographs can be taken at different distances, angles, directions
and heights. The common people could be misinformed if they are not
competent in interpreting distorted pictures.
If one believes that 'the camera does not lie', then one takes it for
granted that one sees reality in the photography. But in the absence of
detailed information of the conditions under which a photograph is taken
and subsequent editing aspects, the viewer is liable to be mis-informed.
Deception is the outcome of such misinterpretation. There are
situations where photographic evidence is taken for granted in settling
disputes and conflicts. But now, new digitally produced images can be
transmitted electronically without loss of quality.
The viewer could be gloriously deceived beyond doubt.
"I will suppose that the heavens, the air, the earth, colours,
shapes, sounds and all external things that we see are only illusions
and deceptions which he uses to take me in".
The evil demon finds its modern equivalent in the cynical
photojournalist or picture editor who uses new electronic technology to
manipulate what the viewer of a news photograph sees. |