Iran to resume suspended nuke research
TEHRAN, Wednesday (AFP) Iran announced it would resume nuclear fuel
research after a suspension of over two years, prompting the UN atomic
watchdog to warn Tehran that it must maintain a freeze on sensitive
nuclear work.
President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said that Iran would not "step back" on
its decision to resume nuclear fuel work, state television reported.
"Our country will go forward on the nuclear path with patience,
wisdom and planning," the hardline president was quoted as saying after
a parliament session on the state budget.
"We will not make a step back on our path," he said, adding that he
had informed the UN atomic agency of Iran's intent in a letter.
Iran's student-run news agency ISNA further quoted Ahmadinejad as
rejecting Western influence on Iranian policies because "research has no
restrictions or red lines."
"We cannot base our national interest on their policy," he said.
The deputy head of Iran's atomic energy agency, Mohammad Saidi, also
said the UN nuclear watchdog has already been informed of the step,
which risks creating further strains in talks with European negotiators.
"In a letter, the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) has been
informed that Iran will start research on the technology of nuclear fuel
in a few days, with the cooperation and coordination of the agency,"
Saidi told state television. "We think our experts have undergone lots
of losses during this period (of suspension). Many of our researchers
have lost their jobs," he added.
Saidi did not specify exactly what the research concerned, but said
that the Islamic republic had "voluntarily" suspended such activities
for around "the past two-and-a-half years."
This timescale would correspond to the date when Iran announced in
October 2003 that it was temporarily suspending uranium enrichment, a
process that can be used to create nuclear fuel for reactors and also
the cores of atomic bombs.
Diplomats have said that were Iran to resume enriching uranium it
would deal a fatal blow to the negotiating process, already fragile
after Tehran restarted uranium conversion last year - the precursor step
to enrichment.
In a statement confirming receipt of the letter, the IAEA said its
director general Mohammed ElBaradei "recalls the importance placed by
the IAEA Board that Iran maintains its suspension of all
enrichment-related activity as a key confidence building measure."
It said "he continues to call on Iran to take the steps the IAEA
requires to resolve outstanding issues regarding the nature of Iran's
nuclear programme."
However Saidi insisted that the decision was not linked to the
production of nuclear fuel. "This issue... has nothing to do with
production of nuclear fuel. These two are separate things from one
another. No decision has been made about nuclear fuel production." The
IAEA said it was seeking clarifications from Iran as to the
"implications" of the decision.
France on Tuesday called on Iran to reverse its move, saying if Iran
was to observe a suspension on enrichment it also had to halt research.
"We would like Iran to abide by the suspension of all activities
related to the enrichment and reprocessing... which includes centrifuges
and research," foreign ministry spokesman Jean-Baptiste Mattei said.
Meanwhile, a delegation from Moscow is to visit Tehran on Saturday
amid continued Russian efforts to break the deadlock between Iran's
insistence on maintaining its right to enrichment and EU demands it
renounces the practice.
"A Russian delegation led by Deputy Foreign Minister (Sergei) Kisliak,
is due to come on January 7 to discuss the Russian proposal," said
foreign ministry spokesman Hamid Reza Asefi.
Moscow has suggested allowing Iran to conduct uranium enrichment in
Russia, giving it access to the nuclear fuel cycle while guaranteeing
its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes only.
However Asefi reaffirmed Iran would not consider the offer unless it
acknowledges the country's right to conduct uranium enrichment
operations in Iran, so far the key sticking point in negotiations with
the European Union.
"It's not a structured proposal it is still an idea, we have to
discuss it. There are ambiguities but if it says that enrichment can
only happen in Russia it's not acceptable, but if it's a parallel and
complementary plan we will consider that." |