DAILY NEWS ONLINE


OTHER EDITIONS

Budusarana On-line Edition
Silumina  on-line Edition
Sunday Observer

OTHER LINKS

Marriage Proposals
Classified Ads
Government - Gazette
Tsunami Focus Point - Tsunami information at One PointMihintalava - The Birthplace of Sri Lankan Buddhist Civilization
 

Supreme Court rules :

Presidential Poll this year
 

THE Supreme Court yesterday ended the controversy surrounding the date of the next Presidential Election, ruling that it should be held this year.

The Five - Judge Bench of the Supreme Court allowing the Fundamental Rights application of the Jathika Hela Urumaya (JHU) directed the first respondent Elections Commissioner to take steps to hold the election in the current year in terms of the Article 31 (3) of the Constitution and the applicable law.

The Supreme Court yesterday held that the second term of the President in office should begin with the declaration of the results of the Presidential Election for a period of six years.

The Bench comprised Chief Justice Sarath N. Silva PC, with Justice Nihal Jayasinghe, Justice Nissanka Udalagama, Justice Nimal Dissanayake and Justice Nimal Gamini Amaratunga.

The Chief Justice delivering the judgement with the other four judges agreeing interpreted the ambiguous Amended Article 31 (3A) (d) (i) the Third Amendment to the Constitution, with regard to the commencement of the second term of the President on the basis that the President would hold office for a "period of six years commencing on the date on which the results of the election is declared, being in the present case December 22, 1999."

The Chief Justice delivered the 24 page type-written judgement amid pin-drop silence for nearly 45 minutes in a court-house packed with lawyers and others. Tight security prevailed in and around the court-house during the proceedings.

Petitioner Ven. Dr. Omalpe Sobhitha cited Elections Commissioner and the Attorney General as the respondents.

The petitioner stated that he had learnt that the first respondent was taking steps to hold the Election in the next year. He stated that the failure to hold the election in 2005 would be unlawful and in violation of the rights of the petitioner.

Manohara de Silva with W.D. Weeraratne, Udaya Gammanpila, Govinda Jayasinghe, K.H.C. Kahandawela and N. Perusinghe appeared for the petitioner Ven. Dr. Omalpe Sobhitha Thera, the general Secretary of the JHU.

Elmore Perera with Shariff A. Navaz appeared for the Elections Commissioner. Second respondent Attorney General K.C. Kamalasabayson PC appeared with Deputy Solicitor General Jayantha Jayasuriya and Nerin Pulle.

President's Counsel H.L. de Silva, with President's Counsel Nigel Hatch, Chanaka de Silva and Gaston Jayakody, M.A. Sumanthiran with Viran Corea and Aravinda Athurupana with Kamal Nissanka made submissions as amicus curiae.

For full text of Judgement

FEEDBACK | PRINT

 

| News | Editorial | Business | Features | Political | Security | Sports | World | Letters | Obituaries |

 

Produced by Lake House Copyright © 2003 The Associated Newspapers of Ceylon Ltd.

Comments and suggestions to : Web Manager