Burgher emigration - a clarification
by J. B. Muller
The person who referred to the Burghers as "so-called Burghers' is
still with us and he has a theory why the Burghers emigrated from as far
back as 1942.
Burghers of Sri Lanka |
Adverting to the reason for the mass emigration of the Burghers to
other parts of the world he quotes one D.L.G. Silva (another person with
an Iberian surname) and agrees with him that it was not solely due to
the utterly disastrous language policy introduced in 1956 and
implemented from 1961. He is correct in fact but in grave error in the
implications he attempts to insinuate.
After the Donoughmore constitution was introduced in 1931 Southern
majoritarianism raised its head, marginalizing all the other communities
on the Island. Democracy does not mean the domination by one ethnic and
religio-cultural community; it means equality and mutual respect for
all.
In 1931 what was instituted instead of a broadly representative
democracy was rule by a small coterie who formed a new ruling clique.
This clique kept out the members of all other communities-indulging in a
bit of window dressing by taking in two to three Tamils, Moors, and
Malays to give themselves a patina of decorum and recognition.
No genuine Burgher could countenance racism in any form and those who
were able surmounted the 'White Australia' policy erected by the
Government of Australia and emigrated there. Others who couldn't meet
such stringent requirements went to other English-speaking countries
such as Britain, Canada, New Zealand, and South Africa. Today, they are
domiciled in those countries as well as in Brazil, Israel, the United
States, and elsewhere.
Our misguided, misinformed, and obviously prejudiced writer goes on
to state that the Burghers felt that they had lost their 'dubious'
prestige. Any Burgher employed in the Public Services was so employed
not because he or she was a Burgher and a Christian but purely on merit.
Such Burghers rose to the highest echelons of the Public Service
(even after independence) purely on the basis of worth and many excelled
in the official language, Sinhala, beating Sinhalese at the public
service examinations. It is a well known fact that they never went after
either Ministers or MPs in order to obtain promotions, transfers,
increments or other favours and in departments run by them there was
never even a whisper of bribery, corruption or nepotism.
If Burghers enjoyed some prestige it was due entirely to their
unassailable integrity, decency, and trustworthiness.
He goes on to discuss the second or third class status of the
Burghers overseas. Is this because they enjoy first class status in Sri
Lanka? If they saw no future for themselves in their motherland, so did
a good many Sinhalese, Tamils, Moors, Malays, Bharathas, Chetties,
Sindhis and Borahs who also emigrated and form considerable communities
in the countries mentioned.
What about the thousands of people who leave these shores illegally
for Italy, Australia, Britain, and Canada--generally if not exclusively
Sinhalese? They are also going seeking better economic prospects and
more abundant futures for their children.
Many of these writers do not appear to acknowledge the overwhelming
streak of racial and religious bigotry that they subscribe to. Those are
things absolutely repugnant to Burghers. If the question is asked: "Why
did Burghers emigrate?" the answer would have to be sought within the
consciousness of the majority and not amongst the Burghers and other
communities that call this Island their Motherland.
Buddhism in its pristine purity does not recognize 'race' or 'ethnic
purity' as a factor of any importance amongst human beings.
The teaching of Siddhartha Gautama, Lord Buddha, are universal and
for all mankind, not just the Sinhala people. To claim that the Buddha-dhamma
was exclusively for the Sinhala people is another fallacy, another myth,
another factor that divides rather than unites and the sooner
intelligent Sinhala Buddhists recognize this, the sooner Sri Lanka and
her peoples would be able to function as 'SRI LANKANS.'
The Burgher community, despite the vicissitudes of time and
circumstance, are always proud to call Sri Lanka their motherland-home
and they have never felt otherwise.
To those who made the choice to settle here voluntarily, Sri Lanka
meant a land free of oppression, coercion, the threat of force,
religious intolerance, and all the other factors that impelled them to
leave hearth and home and traverse perilous seas to land here. That's
what Sri Lanka is to the Burghers: HOME! |