Jayantha Dhanapala honoured: Receives Sahabdeen award
Co-operation of other states indispensable for our security
Address made by Dr. Jayantha Dhanapala at the Mohamed Sahabdeen
Awards Ceremony
Dr. Jayantha Dhanapala |
I begin by thanking the Sahabdeen Trust Foundation for this award.
Honours in my own country are more warmly appreciated by me than the
accolades I have been privileged to receive in foreign countries.
Receiving such an honour as the Sahabdeen Award from a highly respected
civil society organisation, also creates in me a deep sense of humility
because of the past recipients of this award and the eminent company
that I am in this evening. To be honoured together with the
distinguished scientist Professor Narlikar of India and with two of Sri
Lanka's most prominent intellectuals and role models - Kumari
Jayawardena and Godfrey Gunatilleke - has set the bar so high that I
seriously doubt I have been able to vault over it.
I owe Dr. Sahabdeen a special word of thanks. A brilliant student of
Philosophy who succeeded in entering the prestigious and elitist Ceylon
Civil Service, comparable to France's 'Enarques' - or the Ecole
Nationale d'Administration (ENA) alumni - he retired prematurely to
devote his time to academic pursuits and, to what I can best describe
as, being a good citizen. Amidst the raucous noise and violence we hear
and see, it is people like Dr. Sahabdeen who leaven and dignify our
society. He reminds us, silently and unostentatiously, of the basic
moral decency that continues to be the cohesive glue in our country and
the heights of cultured living and selfless philanthropy that we as Sri
Lankans, of all ethnic and religious groups, are capable of. As the
famous 13th century Sufi poet Jalalud'din Rumi (well known to Dr.
Sahabdeen) once wrote -
"What will our children do in the morning if they do not see us fly?"
I wish Dr. Sahabdeen and the Sahabdeen Trust Foundation many more
years of service to our country. The invitation card to this event
indicates that I am receiving an award for "Peace and International
Understanding". My work in international affairs, in fact, is
inextricably interlinked with my current task of achieving national
security through a negotiated political settlement as a lasting healing
process of the conflict that remains an open wound with the ceasefire
agreement as a mere bandaid. For the security of all nations contributes
towards international peace and security and in today's highly
integrated world we are more inter-dependent than we realise. The high
level panel on threats, challenges and change, which reported at the end
of last year to the Secretary-General of the United Nations, has stated
"Today, more than ever before, threats are interrelated and a threat to
one is a threat to all. The mutual vulnerability of weak and strong has
never been clearer."
And so, whether it is the attacks in the USA on September 11, 2001
which increased the number of people living in poverty by 10 million and
cost the global economy more than $ 80 billion or the potential of a
disease being spread from one state through any one of 700 million
international airline passengers to cause millions of deaths in a number
of countries, we are faced again and again with the incontrovertible
fact that global security is both collective and multi-faceted. Our own
insecurity and our instability have an impact on regional and global
security. It is a shared responsibility, which explains the interest and
concern of so many members of the international community in helping us
overcome our problems. The xenophobic reaction of some sections of our
community to this fails to understand that in today's world the
co-operation of other states is indispensable for our security. The
violence, which has torn our country apart, stems from a fundamental
failure in good governance and political management throughout our
post-independence history. It was not initially caused by anyone but
ourselves. It is therefore we alone who bare the primary 'responsibility
to protect' our people of all groups from a resumption of hostilities
with all the suffering, death and destruction that will surely follow.
Basic principle
With the memories of the genocide of Rwanda and the massacre of
Srebrenica haunting the conscience of the world, the influential and
far-reaching report of the Canadian-sponsored Commission on Intervention
and State Sovereignty of December 2001 recommended the basic principle
that state sovereignty implies responsibility and the primary
responsibility for the protection of its people lies with the state.
However, where a population is suffering serious harm as a result of
internal war, insurgency, repression or state failure and the state in
question is unwilling or unable to halt or avert it, the principle of
non-intervention in the internal affairs of states - a long hallowed
principle of international relations upheld by Non-aligned countries
like ours - yields to the international responsibility to protect. The
latter responsibility has to be exercised by the UN Security Council in
accordance with the Charter and prescribed procedures.
This concept of 'responsibility to protect' has gained wide
acceptance and has undoubtedly influenced the reports of the High level
Panel and the UN Secretary-General which form the basis of the
discussions going on the United Nations General Assembly today. It is
however a principle viewed warily by a number of developing countries
who see it as a form of neo-colonialism which will also not be
implemented even-handedly as for example, with oppressed minorities in
larger and more powerful countries.
Negotiated solution
For us in Sri Lanka, it is still within our hands to remedy our
problems through a negotiated political solution within the framework of
a united, democratic and pluralist Sri Lanka where all religious and
ethnic groups can live together in peace, equality, dignity and freedom.
The international community and its institutions are ready to help us in
this long overdue task of peace building for the cause of remaking our
nation. A central truth that emerges from the UN Secretary-General's
important report of March 21, 2005 entitled. 'In Larger Freedom' is this
- "We will not enjoy development without security, we will not enjoy
security without development, and we will not enjoy either without
respect for human rights. Unless all these causes are advanced, none
will succeed." As we engage in the complex task of peace building in Sri
Lanka, let us ponder on the wisdom in these words.
It is not only our national peace and security that is challenged and
faces many threats. International peace and security is likewise under a
great strain from a host of challenges and threats. The Stockholm
International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) in its latest Yearbook
has noted that in 2004, 19 major armed conflicts took place in 17
locations and all of them were intra-state conflicts. Happily Sri Lanka,
because of its ceasefire - however often that may be violated - is not
among these conflicts. In the recent past, over 40 countries have been
ravaged by conflicts displacing some 25 million people. Another alarming
statistic is the fact that global military expenditure in 2004 is
estimated at being US$ 1035 billion in current dollar terms. This
corresponds to $ 162 per capita and 2.6 per cent of world GDP. The top
100 companies in the arms trade registered arms sales to the value of $
236 billion in 2003. Nuclear weapons arsenals, among the 5 nuclear
weapon states recognised within the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and
the three outside the NPT, number over 30,000 many of them on
ready-to-launch alert status. The danger of terrorism has been
aggravated by the possibility of terrorists gaining access to weapons of
mass destruction.
But the threats and challenges are not confined to the commonly known
military area of security. Today they abound in the non-military area
through poverty with over one billion people living below the poverty
line of one dollar per day and 20,000 dying from poverty each day;
pandemics like HIV/AIDS which have killed 20 million and infected 40
million more, environmental degradation, climate change, natural
disasters like the tsunami that we faced in December 2004 and a host of
other economic, social and even cultural dangers.
An attempt was made in the Millennium Summit of the UN General
Assembly of 2000 to address the urgent issues facing the global
community in a collective response. That led to the adoption of the
Millennium Declaration - a landmark document adopted by the largest
assembly of heads of state and Government ever to meet at the UN.
Divisive controversy
Since then we have had the deeply divisive controversy over the
invasion of Iraq in 2003 by a group of states led by the US without the
formal sanction of a UN Security Council resolution. This affected the
concept of collective security on which a consensus had existed. Seeking
to restore this consensus, a high level panel was asked to make
recommendations. These recommendations are now in.
We also have the UN Secretary-General's own report based on the
report of the high level panel and the report of Prof. Jeffrey Sachs on
the implementation of the Millennium Development Goals. The delegations
in the UN General Assembly are discussing a draft document for adoption
by the heads of State and Government in September this year. This is a
critical exercise and NGOs as well as Governments are actively involved
in shaping the outcome although, most regrettably, there has been very
little public discussion of this in Sri Lanka. It is an opportunity in
the sixtieth anniversary year of the UN to redesign a world body more
suited to the challenges of the 21 century. The task ahead involves more
than the reform and enlargement of the Security Council although that is
certainly an important element. Specific recommendations have been made
in the political, economic, human rights and institutional areas. They
include the forging of a security consensus; conflict prevention; the
establishment of a standby capacity for rapid deployment of UN
peacekeeping; the creation of a peace building commission with a
standing fund and a peace building support office, agreement on the use
of force in maintaining international peace and security, the elevation
of the commission on human rights into a standing human rights council
and a series of economic measures linked to the millennium development
goals and recent UN conferences. This debate will go on in the next few
weeks and the outcome will have a major impact on the UN and all our
countries in the next few years.
As we reflect on how our world body can be reformed to face the
challenges of the future based on the experience of the past, we must
begin with a foundation of ethical values and principles that we can
share. The use of the term 'Ethics' for a set of moral principles
presupposes that we are all bound by a common understanding of what we
mean. In a very broad sense, we are talking about the absolutely
irreducible minimum of humankind's cultural, moral and spiritual
achievement over centuries of civilisation. It is the quintessence of
all religious philosophies and the highest common factor among all
cultures.
Ethics per se would be of little value if they did not have a
practical propensity to be applied to human affairs and the improvement
of the human condition. It is widely, but wrongly, assumed that the
realm of ethical values and the world of pragmatic politics are wide
apart and that never than twain shall meet. The achievements of the UN
illustrate that there can be a fusion between ethics and policy, and it
is this fusion that contributes to the betterment of mankind and to
peace.
Early years
We are still in the early years of the first century of a new
millennium in the human saga, leaving behind the bloodiest century of
all time. There is a unique opportunity for us to use the indisputable
legitimacy and authority that the UN wields as a norm-building body, to
shape a world order that is built more solidly on ethics than on the
exclusive pursuit of individual profit or national self-interest.
The shared values set out in the United Nations Millennium
Declaration serve as a common ethnical base. They are reiterated in the
draft document before the General Assembly. They comprise six of the
most basic aspirations of humankind - freedom, equality, solidarity,
tolerance, respect for nature and shared responsibility. From each of
these fundamental values we draw our guidance for the specific action
plans to which the international community must commit itself. It is a
moral compass for us all. Individually these values represent powerful
forces that have inspired and motivated humankind throughout millennia
of history. They have been the accelerators of human progress.
Collectively, they also represent the benchmark against which we must
judge our performance as individual nations and collectively as the
world community in taking humankind forward to a better and safer world.
* The values are, firstly, Freedom - the spur that rid the world of
slavery, colonialism and apartheid; it is the ethical value that
protects men, women and children from fear, exploitation and abuse, from
injustice and deprivation; and from want and hunger.
* Secondly, equality - is what drove societies to abolish
discrimination on the basis of colour, creed, wealth, ethnicity,
aristocratic origin and gender; It is the ethical value that empowers
individuals in society and nations in the international community
whether big or small, rich or poor, mighty or meek.
* Thirdly, solidarity - is the sense of a common identity as one
human family with reciprocal duties and obligations that has led to
social contracts and social security within countries and to the aid and
assistance of the wealthy and developed countries to those who are
stricken with disease, disaster and endemic poverty: It is the ethical
value that must ensure the elimination of injustices, asymmetries in
globalised development and absolute power.
* Fourthly, Tolerance - is the glue that has bonded us together as
human beings with mutual respect for each other despite our astonishing
diversity both within nations and in the international community; it is
the ethical value that will prevent ethnic and religious conflict within
nations and the 'clash of civilisations' on a global scale ensuring
instead a 'dialogue among civilisations;' and the celebration of human
diversity as an endowment.
* Fifthly, Respect for nature - is what has preserved the available
and potential natural resources of our planet earth and our ecological
system as our common heritage to serve the genuine needs and not the
greedy wants of mankind; it is the ethical value that will guide us to
sustainable development managing our consumption of resources equitably
and wisely so that we pass on the world which we occupy as a trust, to
generations to come in at least as healthy and wholesome a state as we
received it from preceding generations.
* Finally, shared responsibility - is the common realisation that we
are one brotherhood and sisterhood places together in a world that is
more integrated than ever before through the processes of globalisation
and that the management of public goods has to be achieved optimally
through participatory, people-centred endeavours and good democratic
governance at the national level and through multilateralism and
international organisations - with the United Nations as its apex - in
the collective response to global challenges to international peace and
human security; it is the ethical value that will prevent humankind from
anarchy and self-destruction through selfishness and profligacy and the
insurance policy to achieve a rule based international order founded on
the bedrock of international law, human rights and justice.
The translation of these ethical values to the daily world of human
interaction - to do the right thing for the right reason - presents all
of us with an enormous challenge. Already, there are danger signals that
illustrate the erosion of our ethical base. Terrorism, nihilism and
anarchism are ominous symptoms. Are they the result of perceptions that
the policies pursued in the past have been divorced from ethics? Or are
they the emergence of new threats for which our collective response must
not be militarism but a return to implementing our shared value base of
ethics-honestly, transparently and consistently?
It would help our task of rebuilding a consensus on common security
it we had a barometer to measure the performance of all our leaders in
the achievement of implementing ethics as policy. The world has seen the
evolution of numerous indices for human progress. We have economic and
social indicators ranging from gross national product in quantitative
terms to the Human Development Index in qualitative terms. There are
other more specific indices such as Corruption Index from Transparency
International and a Freedom Index from Freedom House.
Ethical Policy Index
I would hope that research organisations, think tanks and NGOs would
combine their efforts to devise an Ethical Policy Index ranking
countries in accordance with their adherence to a commonly accepted set
of ethical values such as those enshrined in the Millennium Declaration
of the United Nations. That will contribute to some pressure on
governments to be accountable to their people in adopting policies that
will be of widespread and durable benefit. It is but one of many tools
we can propose in the quest for a greater role for ethics in the
formulation of policy to respond to the new threats to security and to
the other challenges facing humankind today. It is an urgent task to
preserve and develop the mainsprings of our common humanity for a new
and glorious chapter of human history, which Sri Lanka can enjoy along
with other members of the international community.
A return to basic ethical principles and values are no more urgently
needed than in our own country where advocates of exclusivism,
prejudice, hate and violence stand in the way of rebuilding a peaceful
and prosperous nation.
Let us remember the words of Buddha, as recorded in the Dhammapada:
The others know not that in this quarrel we perish. Those of them who
realise it, have their quarrels calmed thereby." It is time we calmed
the quarrels among ourselves. Thank you. |