Victims of medical negligence - can they expect any relief?
by Chandani Jayatilleke
The ordeal of waiting at a State hospital
|
Within a short span of six months this year, Sri Lanka's health
sector reported several shocking incidents of medical negligence.
A 48-year-old mother alleged that her healthy leg was accidentally
amputated at the Negombo Base Hospital.
A 45-year-old mother reportedly died after receiving a transfusion of
the wrong blood type at the same hospital.
A baby was allegedly strangled to death during delivery when staff
tried to pull the child from the womb using a piece of cloth wrapped
around the neck.
A midwife at a Colombo hospital tried to hurry the delivery of a
child because she wanted to catch a bus. The baby died.
In another incident two children were found in Chilaw, with a
mysterious ailment following wrong medicine alleged to have been
prescribed by a doctor.
If we consider some of the previous medical negligence cases, the
common allegation is that Sri Lanka does not have sufficient laws to
prove the culpability of errant medical staff. Even if there is a
complaint and case (which usually drags on for a few years), there is no
mechanism at all to compensate the victims.
As a result of negligence by certain medical staff, patients have
lost their limbs, children have lost organs and some have lost their
lives. Many of these victims come from ordinary families, therefore,
they do no have sufficient financial means to continue to fight a legal
battle.
Although many victims and their loved ones have complained against
suspects, they have a long wait for justice as most cases do not make
much progress. There is no easy and swift way to obtain justice in such
cases.
Victims allege that the medical fraternity prefers to cover up the
culpability of their staff, rather than wanting justice for victims. In
certain cases the victim had been prevented from making a complaint
immediately after the incident. In the case of amputation of the wrong
leg, it was reported, the victim was kept in the hospital for almost one
month to keep her silent.
The Sri Lanka Medical Council (SLMC) says that it has received a
complaint from the above victim which is being investigated currently.
However, the SLMC cannot say when the case would be over.
Health and access to better medical care is a basic human right.
According to a statement by Asian Human Rights Organisation based in
Hong Kong: "The delay in starting an investigation has given the
perpetrators all the time they need to falsify documents and destroy or
manufacture evidence.
Nor is civil litigation a solution. In Sri Lanka, such cases can take
over one or two decades to run their course. The process is cumbersome
and expensive: beyond both the comprehension and means of ordinary
victims. Attempts at prolonged litigation only amount to further denials
of remedies for fundamental rights violations."
We spoke to the Registrar of the Sri Lanka Medical Council (SLMC).
Question: What is the normal procedure for complaining in an event of a
medical negligence?
Answer: Well... when there is a case of medical negligence, the
victim or his/her family could make a written complaint with an
affidavit to the SLMC. At the same time the victim can proceed with a
court case as well.
Q: What happens when there is a complaint? Is it just a court
case? Or will there be a Medical Council (or any medical authority)
investigation? Is there any official inquiry? Is there a cover up
system? (unofficially)
A: We conduct an official inquiry, according to the gazetted
disciplinary procedure within the SLMC. The first inquiry is conducted
by the Preliminary Procedure Committee chaired by SLMC's Deputy
Chairman. Following this inquiry, the Committee decides if it needs to
be continued with further information. Otherwise the Committee can
arrive at a decision at this point.
If it needs further investigation, the parties will be asked to
provide more information and a report will be prepared based on the
findings of the preliminary investigation.
Thereafter the Professional Conduct Committee chaired by SLMC
President with 10 members will study the report for a decision or they
would hand over the case to the SLMC lawyers by whom the final decision
will be taken.
Q: What is the penalty?
A: According to the Medical Council, the person in question
can be suspended or his/her name can be erased from the SLMC list. After
that the suspect cannot practise as a medical professional. And his
privileges will also be suspended. However, the suspect has the option
to appeal against this decision too.
Q: How long will it take to get a final solution?
A: It depends on the nature of the case.
However, a case can continue for one year to three years. This is
mainly due to the slow process of submitting various documents by
certain institutions involved in the case.
Q: This system appears to be rather unfair by the victim. Is
there any mechanism to compensate the victim?
A: According to the present ordinance, there is no
compensation system to benefit the victim.
Q: Isn't the SLMC more in favour of the medical professional
than the victim or the patient?
A: Well... the medical professional is also entitled to
protect his own human rights.
Q: How many cases are being reported on a yearly basis?
A: In 2004, we received 32 cases of medical negligence and we
hope that the figure would be much higher this year. In the first six
months of this year, we have received over 20 complaints.
Q: Are there any proposals to speed up the process and to duly
compensate the victim or the patient? What do you suggest?
A: There is a need to amend the Medical Ordinance of the SLMC.
We have made proposals in this regard in 1999. So far nothing has
happened. We have also suggested to have a lawyer and an accountant
appointed by the Government on our staff. On the other hand the decision
making at the institutional level has to be expedited.
We admit that there should be a system to offer compensation for
victims of medical negligence. Ideally, there should be a separate,
independent body for this purpose. There are times that even if the
victim takes the case to a court of law, it could be difficult to prove
the case in favour of the victim, said the Registrar of SLMC.
Following the growing number of complaints of medical negligence over
the last few months, Health Minister Nimal Siripala de Silva suggested
the setting up of a special board to look into such incidents. Minister
de Silva said he was in discussions with the Public Service Commission
and the trade union representatives to arrive at a decision on this
matter. Besides, the Ministry is also planning to introduce a new
insurance system where the aggrieved party could claim compensation in
the event of incidents of medical negligence.
While the Minister has made a promise to look into the issue in a
serious manner, the medical fraternity in the country should also pay
more attention to the issue and try to improve the quality of medical
service they provide and ensure that medical negligence is minimised.
At the same time, they should implement a swift and effective system
to investigate suspected medical negligence cases. |