A new light on ancient Middle East religio-politics
through literary and archaeological evidence:
Buddhism in ancient Israel and Arabia
BY A. D. T. E. Perera
Formerly, Associate Editor, Encyclopaedia of
Buddhism, Government of Sri Lanka, Publication, Research Associate
Professor, Department of Philosophy, University of New Mexico, USA,
Guest Research Fellow, Department of Disarmament and Development, UNO,
New York
(Continued from May 23)
AMONG the higher gods who were worshipped by Bedouins of the deserts
of North Arabia, the most important was Allah, Allat, Al-Uzza. They were
pre-Islamic gods. Even prophet Mohammed's father bore the name 'Abd-Allah'
or 'Abdullah', meaning a worshipper or servant of Allah.
Allah was worshipped in the Kabah and possibly represented by the
famous blackstone in that place. "Allat" is believed to have been
introduced into Arabia from Syria (ancient Aram) according to
inscriptional evidence.
Let us now turn to the other problem, the most baffling question of
the etymological origin of the word 'God'. We have searched high and
low, to solve the mystery of 'God'. We turned our investigations into
almost every available lexicon, dictionary and encyclopoedia, without
any avail.
No publication that we have surveyed could give us an explanation as
to how the word 'God' originated in the World. Finally we had to give up
all our hopes and prayed to God to help us., "Oh, God lead me from
darkness to light" - "Tamaso majyotir gamaya", and lo, there appeared
the light, "Aloko Udapadi", as the greatest of all Arahat, the Supreme
Buddha declared.
We can now with assurance declare that the word 'God' is derived from
nothing else but the word 'Buddha', "How could that be?" will be the
question of all those God fearing good souls.
Our researches proved that this word "God" is nothing but a
derivative of the word "Buddha" from the secondary formation "Boddo", an
early form, how the ancient Indo-Greeks, (also known as Bactrian
Greeks), Sakas, Parthians, and Kushanas (Yue-Chih) used in their
documents to name the Great Lord, Bhagavat Buddha.
The name "Buddha" with "d" as a dental consonant is quite difficult,
I have observed, for many westerners to pronounce. Even at present, this
happens to be so.
In USA and in Australia, during my University lectures (In these two
countries) I have found many Westerners (Europeans) pronounce the word
Buddha always with a cerebral 'd'. When I tried to correct them in my
classroom, it was the most difficult task for them, to pronounce
"Buddha" and sound the dentall 'd'.
They make a jaw breaking effort, yet without success and pronounce,
'Buddha' like 'Buddo' or 'Boddo' ('d' as in 'door' or "do"). sometimes I
got amused but often disappointed, yet I could not help it but had to
tolerate their great difficulty in pronouncing the name 'Buddha'.
However, now I feel happy that I had the good occasion to confront
with such people because this very experience has been a pointer to
solve the most intriguing thing, how the mystery word "GOD" appeared in
the world.
In the coins issued by early Indo-Greeks (also known as
Bactrian-Greeks), Scythians, Sakas and Kushanas of West Asia who were
converted to Buddhism (a few centuries after the Alexandrian conquests
of Persia and other kingdoms of Middle East) have for the first time in
history of Buddhist iconography, the image of Buddha on the obverse side
of their coins.
This numismatic evidence is like "God sent" to me, the only clue to
solve the present problem of the etymological origin of "God".
Through my recollections, how my American and Australian students
pronounced the word "Buddha" during my university lectures, I managed to
trace its roots in the Indo-Greek numismatics. It could be presumed that
the same problem had been encountered by the western people whether they
be Greeks of West-Asians.
They too must have pronounced the name "Buddha" as "Boddo" and
inscribed it on the reverse side of their coins. the best example is the
coin issued by the great Kushana Emperor Kanishka, with a standing image
of the Buddha (on the obverse) with the legend BODDO.
Araha and Allah
I am sure the Bactrian Greeks (or the Indo-Greeks) as they were
called by several scholars, to distinguish them from Selcuicid Greeks)
had not used the dental 'd' in BODDO legend of the coins that was
inscribed on the obverse side.
Thus Bhagavat Buddha had been introduced to West-Asia and Middle
East, as a Great Superhuman being worthy of worship, under the epithet "Boddo"
during the first century of the Christian era and would have possibly
replaced the former 'Araha' -Alaha (Allah) ideal of the original
Buddhism (the Theravada ideal as some scholars would prefer to
distinguish original Buddhism), that the great monk Ven. Punna
established in Sunaparanata (the Sinai-Arabah region), his homeland, as
we have demonstrated already (the West-Asian region).
Thus within a century at least of the Christian era, the Buddha -
Boddo - Bod - God, ideal had been established and had penetrated into
the region of Sinai-Arabah where the Araha - Alaha Allah concept of the
supreme sinless compassionate Lord, was prevailing.
Based on our new discovery, we do not hesitate to declare that the
mystic word 'GOD' has gone into the Holy Scriptures of at least some of
those West Asiatic people (who held Araha - Alaha - Allah as the Supreme
Being) through the linguistic or philological formation of BODDO',
during the first century of the Christian era.
Jews who held "Torah" as their foremost Sacred Holy Scriptures would
not have yielded to those extraneous religious texts or scriptures of
the Buddhist Sects established by Punna Thera, wherein Araha, Alaha or
Allah appeared variantly.
This can be clearly seen in the firm stand of Jews in recognising
Jehowah (Yehoweh) as their Divine father, the Supreme Creator, right
throughout from pre-Christian centuries up to now, and not Alaha or even
Allah as it has gone into Aramaic and Arabic Holy Scriptures, and more
so the all loving compassionate Boddo, Bod, God who they thought would
not conform to their ideal of an Eternal Creator God - Jehowah who does
not hesitate to punish those who go against his commandments and
covenents.
Jehowah worshippers
There must have been bitter resentment between the two factions,
namely, the priests (or priest - kings) of Jehowah worshippers and the
cave dwelling eremites who rejected the Jewish torah since the days of
Ven. Punna who preached the peaceful doctrine of "Araha Sambuddo" and
the "Kingdom of Righteousness and baptised their newly ordained novice
monks (a custom that is still being continued in Theravada Buddhist
countries), and eschewed circumcision and totally opposed animal
sacrifice and killing in whatever form to appease an unseen divine
being.
It could be surmised that these Araha or Alaha followers were
primarily the Aparantakas or Arabah and later known as Arabs of the
Nabatean kingdoms that prevailed in this region who called their supreme
religious being, their saviour by the name of ARAHA or ALAHA and finally
Allah.
A recent scholar while explaining 'Allah' as principal God of Mecca
says, "He was also worshipped in other places throughout Arabia as is
shown by the occurrence of the name in Sabean, Minean and particularly
Lihyanite inscriptions".
"Allat according to recent study of the complicated inscriptional
evidence is believed to have been introduced to Arabia from Syria".
(ancient Aram) With the rise in power of Jehowah faction of the primary
Jewish tribes who allied with the Alexandrian Greeks and then with the
Imperial Rome, the followers of Alaha of the Arabah kingdom of Nabateans
were persecuted and severely ill-treated, exiled and gradually pushed
out of their original seat of power in Sinai-Arabah region (modern
Palestine) and had to seek safety in mainland Arabia, where they
established as strong opponents of Jehowah worshipping Jews, and also as
their eternal rivals.
Meanwhile many of those innocent, peaceful, cave dwelling eremite
monks would have been tolerated and allowed to stay in their rock-cut
dwellings as long as they would mind their own business without
interfering with the mainstream Jewish religio political strategy.
Thus the Araha - Alaha worshippers, the peace loving original Sinai
people continued to stay in the region with their cave dwelling monks,
later known as Essenes (may be a derivative from Suna-Sinai), performing
their religious rites and obligations based on high ethical order,
morality and righteousness, and safeguarding and promoting the study and
practice of their original Holy Scriptures the "Peshitta", as opposed to
the Jewish Torah.
However, they too would have had to face occasional persecution
according to the whim and fancy of the Jewish priest kings.
Buddhist Greek Kings
Thus the shrines and temples of those original Araha - Alaha
worshippers founded in the vicinity of the Dead-sea would have continued
to function despite the opposition of the jewsih priests at Jerusalem
etc., and their lay followers of Jehowah, until the appearance of Jesus
Christ and John the Baptist who, it is clear through Bibilical
references, had tried to review the declining Alaha (Buddhalogy)
religion that was yet surviving under great pressure with their temples
either destroyed or appropriated by Jehowah followers.
During the same period one can witness that a neo-Buddhalogy was just
emerging in the former Bactrian-Greek satrapies with territorial
expansion of the imperial Kushanas under the great Buddhist Emperor
Kanishka (cir.ist.Century, A.C.)
Bactrian Greek Kings like Minander (of Milindapanha fame) had already
become devout patrons of Buddhism. The rule of emperor Kanishka gave a
great impetus to Buddhism by spreading it in far away territories beyond
his imperial frontiers.
Emperor Kanishka's period was exactly the time Jesus Christ and John
the Baptist were operating in Jerusalem, and propagating the "Good News"
of the "Kingdom or Righteousness" which the Israeli Jews could not have
correctly grasped, and most unfortunately misunderstood to the great
misfortune of John and Jesus Christ.
Jews were hesitant to crush the new movement, a revivalist campaign,
of Jesus Christ at first, may be because of his affiliations with
imperial Kushanas. However they killed John and framed charges against
Jesus, a rebel against Imperial Rome.
The large followers who accepted Jesus' teachings, too must have made
the cunning Jewish priests, at first, hesitant to do any harm to Jesus.
Therefore they tried various strategies to entrap him.
It could be surmised that the "Arahan Buddha" followers were still
holding on to their scriptures the "Peshitta" and the temples in the
vicinity of Jerusalem.
Their presence during the pre-Christian (pre-Jesus) days can be
definitely proved by the re-discovery of the famous "Dead-Sea Scrolls"
in the early fifties of the present century, the scriptures that
belonged to the cave and forest dwelling monks known as Essenes and
written in arachic Aramaic script.
According to the scanty information that was made available to the
scholarly public by those Jewish-Hebrew scholars who jealously guard the
"Dead-Sea Scrolls" for nearly fifty years without publishing them, under
various pretexts, these documents belonged to the monks dwelling in
forest or cave hermitages and were later called Essenes.
The name "Essenes" could very likely be a later Jewish term from an
original name derived from "Suna-Sinai" the homeland, Sunaparanatha
where Ven. Punna established his group of Suna (Sinai) monks as
demonstrated by us above.
The "Dead-Sea Scrolls" do not refer at all to a higher Divine Being
by the name of Jehowah, unless the recent editors (who jealously guard
these documents) tend to interpolate or smuggle in, the name Jehowah, in
between the lines of these ancient religious scriptures written in
Aramaic.
It is remarkable that without any such evidence at their disposal, as
the newly discovered "Dead Sea Scrolls", some European scholars of the
early decades of the present century have suggested that the "Essenes"
could be an "original forgotten Buddhist Sect."
Scriptures of Araha
Although the Jews rejected "the religion of the Araha" (or Alaha),
the Arabs, from the original Arabah stock, were fortunate enough to have
adhered to the great doctrine found in the "Scriptures of Araha" and
preserved by the monks of the Sinai-Arabah region, (the Dead-Sea
region).
That is why the scholars of Islam have found it possible to declare
that the concept of Allah is pre-Mohammed and had possibly derived from
a religious concept got down from Sinai-Arabah area (or Israel-Palestine
of the present day). This observation confirms our derivation of Essenes
from an original religious community from Sinai.
Most of the pre-Christian and later (appropriated) Islamic temple
sites in Arabia as referred to above, including the famous shrine at
Mecca (which was identified by the great scholar monk Ven. Dr.
Pannananda Mahathera, as the Makulaka monastery of the Buddha's day) has
as the central object of worship a "Sacred stone dais".
The megalithic "Asanaghara" shrines of ancient pre-historic Sri Lanka
and India that were appropriated by the Buddhists later, are a
noteworthy clue which provides the missing link between early (original)
Buddhist temple sites in South Asia and West Asia (middle East).
On the other hand, most of the religious practices of early Christian
religion show that the Christian Church had no approval of Judaism.
Judaic religious practices were anathema to the teaching of Jesus
Christ.
Christian religion abhorred massacre of animals for sacrifice,
circumcision, gullible adherence to Sabbath rituals and practices, no
prayers or invocations for Jehowah the Creator. But of course, the
greatest love and devotion to "the most compassionate righteous God, the
Divine Loving Father in the Eternal Heaven" is emphasised.
We wish to present a few more evidence to substantiate our thesis
that the Buddha's religion introduced to West Asia by Ven. Punna
Mahathera, survived as a counter religious force to Judaic Monotheism,
(in the same way original Buddhism played as a counter force to
monotheistic, animal sacrificing Brahmanic Hindu religion in India) for
many more centuries, preserving its originality intact until it was
absorbed and assimilated into the two faiths namely.
Christianity preached by Jesus Christ and Islam preached by Prophet
Mohammed, yet preserving a good portion of Buddha's original Doctrine -
"Saddharma" and early Buddhist religious cults and practices like,
circumambulating sacred objects of worship, erecting domes above shrines
to symbolize the vastness of Buddha nature like the 'vault of the sky'
or heavenly spheres; worshipping the great Buddha symbolically in the
sacred seat or dais, fiery flame; crescent moon to remind the Buddhist
Sabbath or Poya retreat; rejecting anthropomorphic images of the Supreme
Buddha who is ineffable, elevating the Doctrine (Dhamma) on same part
with the Great Divine Lord.
In the teachings of Jesus Christ, there are clear evidence to prove
that He had definitely preached the Buddha's religion.
Now that we have produced substantial evidence to prove that the very
name 'God' is a derivative of the name 'Buddha' through the Bactrian
Greek - Saka - Scythian - Kushana word Boddo - Bod, it is incumbent on
us to provide further facts to strengthen our thesis.
Jesus teachings
Jesus Christ never referred to a Supreme Divine Being by the name of
Jehowah, the ancient Aramaic Peshitta scriptures, through which the
original Jesus teachings as found in the Holy Bible were formulated,
always had Alaha for the Supreme Being.
The Christian Bible that was translated through Greek into English
from original teaching of Jesus in the Aramaic language, had for the
first time the word 'God', the Divine Father.
The metamorphosis of Alaha to God could be clearly observed during
this period of transition from original Peshitta scriptures (or texts)
to Jesus teachings. The reason for this transformation we have amply
demonstrated above.
Jesus never preached on an everlasting, eternal heaven or Hades as is
found in most other theistic religious systems. Jesus categorically
denied such beliefs when He declared "heaven and earth will not last but
my doctrine will last."
Jesus emphasised that everything will pass over. This is in
conformity with Buddhism which declared everything is impermanent (anicca)
and the 'Doctrine' of Nibbana the Supreme Bliss is eternal, Sanatana
Dhamma. Jesus said, "my doctrine is not mine."
Jesus, chief disciples were males. Jesus and John both spoke about
the 'son of God', 'Children of God'. This was quite consonant with the
epithet of a noble disciple of the Buddha who is truly a Buddhaputto, a
son of the Buddha, a son of Boddo, (Bod - God).
Great compassion
It was Jesus who emphasised the supreme love, the great compassion,
which is 'Mahakaruna' in the teachings of our Lord Bhagavat Buddha (e.g.
mettanca sabhalokasmin - Manasambhavaye aparimanam).
No divine punishment or wrath or an unseen power, heavenly authority,
is there in the teachings of Jesus Christ. His God (Bod -Boddo - Buddha)
was omnipotent or all powerful, omniscient or all knowing (Sabbannu,
epithet of the Buddha) all love Mahakaruniko Natho Hitaya Sabbapaninam
for the Buddha), all righteous, all just, all merciful, the entire
cosmos (or creation as the Bible translators put it) is under His
command or rule (Lokavidu epithet of the Buddha). He is the universal
monarch and His kingdom or righteousness is Supreme (Buddha Rajjyaya or
Buddha Khetta).
"That kingdom of my father," Jesus emphasised, "is not within this
world" (of sinful craving, hatred and ignorance loba, dosa and moha as
Buddha explained).
Jesus stopped the age-old Jewish religious rite of killing animals
for sacrifice (like what the Buddha and his noble disciples did in India
against the Brahmanic Hindu yagas by which thousands of innocent animals
were killed to appease unseen, ferocious, vindictive imaginary divine
beings).
Jesus ridiculed the Jews for their foolish practice of religious
rites and rituals, like gullible adherence to Sabbath and circumcision.
Jesus declared, "Sabbath is for man and man is not for Sabbath," thus
elevating the position of man even above the divine commands which was
in consonance with one of the early Buddhist concepts of understanding
man as 'one who has' an elevated mind (man or mana = mind + ussa =
elevated hence manussa - man).
"Those followers of the kingdom of God are to seek righteousness
above all. This reminds us of the Buddha's admonition - "first establish
in morality" (sile patithaya naro sapanno). "Man is like a God when he
has learned the lessons of mercy," Jesus said, thus bringing God down to
earth.
Sassanian kings of West Asia even issued coins identifying "Buddha as
the Divine Ruler" or God in the present sense. King Peroz I in his coins
engraved the seated image of the Buddha on a throne with the legend, 'Bulda-Yazde'
on it the Buddha's figure is shown with a halo of flames.
'Bulda-Yazde' means 'Buddha the King' which is very much similar to
Islamic expression 'Allah-hu-Akbar', Allah is the ruler. Sinhala
Buddhists always address the Buddha as Budurajan, (Buddha the king).
Jesus abhorred accepting money and property, a rule for Buddhist
monks from the very beginning of Buddhism, which practice had been
strictly adhered to by the Essenes, the cave dwelling eremites of
Jerusalem who lingered for several centuries even after the severe
persecution of 'God's people (Buddho's people), the Buddhists, by the
followers of, Jehowah and the cruel priests of Jerusalem, as the Dead
Sea Scrolls do divulge.
Incidentally it is stated in the Holy Bible that the Jews even hated
God, which is a clear proof that God of Jesus Christ has nothing to do
with Jehowah.
Even a bad thought, let alone fornication, is a sin, taught Jesus,
thus reminding the Buddhists of the Buddha's saying, cetanaham bhikkhave
Kammam vadami. Jesus said: "Love thy lord, thy God, through thy whole
heart, whole soul and whole mind.
This is exactly a revised version of the Buddha's admonition to His
disciples - 'love me and have faith in me and my Dhamma, all of you who
are directed towards the blissful state of Svarga - 'heaven' (mayadhamme
mayi saddhamattam pemamattam, sabbte sagga parayanti)
In every sermon of Jesus Christ that has come down to us in the Holy
Bible (may be after so many alterations, deletions and revisions over
many centuries in the past), we can get a glimpse of Buddha's universal
message of Karuna and Pragna, that is loving kindness and cultivation of
insight.
Jesus practised meditation and fasting as a good exercise for
pacifying and purifying the mind (Samatha bhavana) before reaching
wisdom and insight (Vidassana bhavana).
Allah-hu-Akbar
As foreseen by the Buddha, in his admonition to Ven. Punna, 'under
violent, inhuman persecution and threats by the followers of Jehowah
(the Jewish priests) of Sinaiparan (Sunaparanta) original Buddhism
established by Punna Thera and his disciples and followers of the
Nabatean kingdom of Arabah (around Jerusalem, Bethlehem and Nazareth) up
to Sinai area, had retreated to mainland Arabia and Syria where they
continued to survive as Arabs (or Beduin Arabs - Buddhist Arabs!), who
build shrines with crowning domes, just like the Buddhist architectural
type found in stupas (dagabas) in honour of their supreme blessed One,
Alaha or Allah (or Allat) who was eventually deified as a merciful
being, the Supreme Lord who is the great divine ruler (Allah-hu Akbar).
If our surmise and explanations can be justified, then it could be
argued that in those Arab states where the Aramaic language prevailed,
the Buddhist scriptures and practices too continued to serve with
occasional changes and growth of extraneous cults and practices.
That is why in every pre-Islamic Arab shrine we get domical
structures which surmount the main temple like in Buddhist stupas. There
are also sacred stone altars, platforms and stone daises that are the
main attraction in those shrines e.g. at Jerusalem, Amrah, Petra, Mecca,
etc.
At the beginning these Alaha worshippers were aniconic like original
Theravada Buddhists. But gradually Buddha images and icons of other
divinities and royal patrons were also introduced to embellish the
inside walls and grottos of these Arab religious shrines dedicated to
Alaha (Allah).
That is why and how, when prophet Mohammed reached Mecca and
Jerusalem and other early pre-Islamic Arab shrines and sanctuaries (more
than one thousand years after Punna established Buddhism in Sunaparanta),
he found the presence of images which he condemned and destroyed in his
iconoclastic ardour, mistakenly believing that those were shrines of
Jews, the arch-enemies of Arabs.
Yet, we are fortunate to get a few survivals among which are early
representations of the Buddha (in the exact manner how the Buddha images
were carved in early sites of traditional Buddhist countries), crudely
carved, e.g. the stone image of 'Amyado of Shukayamim'.
According to a recent scholar this is 'a complete statuette in the
round, carved in alabaster. The modelling is done with care but the
lower part of the body is quite out of proportion, due no doubt to
considering the head as the most important part. The inscription of the
base gives the name of 'Ammyada' of 'Shukaymim'.
It could be presumed the name 'Shukaymim' of the figure represented
in this statute as given in the archaic inscription carved out at the
bottom, have preserved for posterity the revered name 'Shakyamuni' of
Bhagavat Buddha, how the Lord Buddha is reverently addressed by the
Buddhists in India, Tibet, China, Korea and Far-East as well as in
Theravada countries like Sri Lanka, Myanmar, Thailand, Kampuchea, Laos,
Vietnam and was also found in the earliest pillar inscription of emperor
Asoka installed at Lumbini.
With no contact with centres of Buddhist learning and culture for
predominant Buddhist kingdoms in Asia, these 'Alaha - Allah' shrines of
mainland Arabia, Middle-East and West Asia continued to exist for
centuries and provided religious ardour to the common folk and rulers as
well.
With the passage of time, these temples, their resident monks and
their followers were subject to the influence of local popular cults and
beliefs of various supernatural beings and divinities, thus giving rise
to new syncretistic religions and religious sects.
Thus by the time of Prophet Mohammed (cir 6th century AC), the origin
of the concept of Alaha and Allah, worship was totally forgotten and
shrouded in obscurity, excepting a few surviving early religious cults
and scriptures handed down from generation to generation which preserved
the basic tenets of former Arahat (Arahan) ideal of original Theravada
Buddhism introduced by Ven. Punna, such as a high moral code (Sila),
belief in rebirth in heaven and a final eternal blissful state (devaloka,
brahmaloka and Nibbana), perambulating as a mode of worship (pradaksina),
wearing white clothes to signify religious sanctity (odata vasana),
repeating many names of the Lord in praise of Him (nava arahadi Buduguna),
no anthropomorphic images but aniconic, symbolic representations of the
Lord (like a dais or altar, asana, flame of fire; foot print, dome or
domical roof.)
God from Buddha
The reader of the present essay may now seek an explanation from us
as to why and how the word 'God', if it was derived from 'Buddha' giving
'Buddo-Bod', was used by Jesus Christ and His followers had the Buddha
been worshipped and was known as Araha or Alaha (and later Allah) among
the West Asian countries of Aramaic speaking people including the
communities with whom Jesus had moved. This was exactly a problem that
had baffled us also. The answer to this problem can be found in the
religio-cultural developments in the region under review.
The learned thesis by Ven. Dr. Pannananda Mahathera, quoted above,
has prompted us to survey a wider geographical region from middle India
to West Asia via the then civilised lands like Persia, Syria, Babylonia.
Had we embarked on our investigation on the origin of the word 'God'
without understanding and analysing the political and religious
background of this region, we would not have been able to find any
answer to the problems that we faced.
The period during which Buddha was preaching His 'Saddharma' and
establishing the 'Kingdom of righteousness' or 'Buddha Rajjyaya' (Buddha
Khetta) in the circa sixth century BC had witnessed the emergency of
various kingdoms and their merging into powerful monarchies in and
around India, e.g. China, Achaemenid Persia, Egypt, Syria, Assyria,
Greece, Crete, Babylonia and the Magadha Kingdom of India.
Middle East and West Asia had witnessed the greatest impact of
politico-cultural upheavals of this period, mainly because of the influx
of so many people to these regions through the great international
highway, the eponymous Uttarapatha (Silk Route, as some do call).
We have already referred to this phenomenon. The availability of such
an international trunk-route that served as quick passage for
information also, caused the spread of the news of the birth of such a
Great Being, a Supreme Buddha beyond the farthest corners of the east
and the west.
Confucius in China and Greek philosophers were made to know or they
themselves knew the Buddha's birth and appearance on earth. We may guess
that such a person like 'Pilotika' who admired the Buddha so much and
was instrumental in the preaching of the sermon 'Culla Hatthipadopama'
(parable of the small elephant foot-print), was a Greek.
Texts say he was golden hued in complexion. They very name sounds
like 'Plato'. We may suggest that Pilotika was a Greek of the Platonic
school or family in Greece.
It could be demonstrated that the Buddha's teachings had reached a
far wider area than the scholars thought, during His very lifetime. Even
the person Zoroastrar we wish to identify with possible evidence at our
disposal, as an early convert to Buddhism.
However, all that had been done towards the spread and establishment
of the Buddha's 'Saddharma' and His 'kingdom of Righteousness', during
the very lifetime of the Buddha by His Arahat monks and by the Buddha
Himself, had experienced a setback within the very few centuries that
followed the passing away of the Buddha, His Parinibbana.
There were various dissentient schools that wished to establish their
own canon despite the original Theravada canon or 'Tripitaka'. Thus such
schools like Sarvastivadins, Sammityas, Purva and Appra Sailiyas,
Mahasanghikas, Lokottara Vadin who were the precursors of the major
dissentient school of Buddhism, the Mahayana, appeared in India.
A few decades before and after the Christian era saw the Satrapies of
Scythians, Sakasa and Kushanas, consolidating themselves in the former
Indo-Greek (or Bactrian Greek) held territories in the north-western
parts of India and beyond.
The rise of emperor Kanishka, the mighty ruler of the Kushana dynasty
had a great impact on Buddhism, because he patronised the new Mahayana
church of Buddhism whereby the Gautama Buddha was elevated to the
position of an Eternal Cosmocrator or a hyper-human being, eternally
residing in the Cosmic Buddhasksettra, the Sukhavati heaven.
In other words, the Great Buddha had been made an eternal divine
being with innumerable Bodhistattvas (angels) attending upon Him, with
the two primary acolytes Mahasthama and Avalokita (cf. the archangels of
Christianity Michael and Gabriel who are supposed to be on either side
of the God's throne in the heaven).
After a 'Sangayana' a grand Buddhist synod of Mahayana monks held at
Purushapura (modern Peshawar), emperor Kanishka also had acted like his
great predecessor emperor Asoka the Maurya, in patronising Buddhism and
sending missionary monks to disseminate the noble doctrine (Saddharma)
of the Buddha, but unlike in the case of Asokan Buddhist missionary
monks, Kanishka's missionaries had a Mahayana tinge of the concept of
the Buddha. (Some scholars refer to a Buddhist Council held by Kanishka
at Vepulla mountain near Rajagrha and systematising a Mahayana treatise
called the Vepulla Sutra).
Our investigations reveal that Jesus Christ and even his
contemporary, the innocent monk John the Baptist, were born to families
of original Alaha (Araha) school of Buddhism that was prevailing or
surviving in the Israel Arabah region where Ven. Punna Thera's monastic
establishments were set up with Jerusalem as the headquarters.
The constant feuds between Jehowah worshipping Hebrew speaking Jewish
tribes and the Alaha worshipping Aramaic speaking Jewish tribes who
later became Arabs can be gleaned if one were to read carefully the Holy
Bible and relevant scriptures.
While the Hebrew speaking Jewish tribes and their scriptures in the
Holy Torah the Aramaic speaking Jewish tribes had their scriptures
compiled in the Holy Peshitta. This is a historical fact that cannot be
disproved however much the Catholic church may dispute with us.
In the biography of Jesus Christ we can see how He challenged the
Jewish priests who tried to dominate and monopolise the Holy Temple at
Jerusalem and even gone to the extent of chasing the unscrupulous
priests out of the premises of the Holy Sanctuary which must have been
patronised by the Jehowah and Alaha worshippers both.
Aramaic world
By the time Jesus was born in Jerusalem, Buddhism in its stronghold
kingdoms in north-west India had developed into Mahayana under the
patronage of Saka-Kushana monarchs as has been explained above.
The Aramaic speaking territories of pre-Christian centuries received
all the inspiration from those Buddhist kingdoms and moreso when emperor
Kanishka expanded his territories under the Kushana empire.
Hence the change of doctrinal policy of Buddhism in these kingdoms it
was natural for the 'Aramaic world' of West Asia also to receive its
influences and impact.
Therefore it could be easily explained that Jesus Christ also had
become an ardent follower of the new school of Buddhism which had
powerful and rich monastic centres in the Kashmir, Pakistan, Afghanistan
and Central Asian region that was the territory in the heart of the
powerful Kushana empire.
This has been proved with evidence through archaeological discoveries
by research scholars, who have found tangible evidence to prove Jesus'
presence in Kashmir which was the part of the great Buddhist empire of
Sakas and Kushanas both, during the first century before and after the
present era.
It could be surmised that Ven. Isa or Jesus the Jew. was sent to
Israel, with the backing and blessings of the powerful Mahayana Buddhist
monks of the Kushana empire who still would have had contacts with Alaha
(Araha) Buddhists in Arabia and Palestine.
Kingdom of righteousness
Evidence at our disposal is strong enough to declare unequivocally
that Jesus was selected as the ideal missionary to spread the
neo-Buddhist doctrine codified after the great Buddhist synod held by
Emperor Kanishka in the same way 'Punna the Jew' was granted permission
to go to the same region five centuries earlier to establish the
'Kingdom of Righteousness' and the 'Good News' of the path to Supreme
Bliss in Eternal Nirvana.
The date of Jesus ministry in Judae region (cir 25-32 AC) tallies
well with the reign of emperor Kanishka according to the latest
reckoning by scholars.
Ven. Isa (or Jesus) had put a very bold front despite Jewish
challenges and threats, even though he was aware that he was operating
within the occupied territory of the Imperial Rome and under ever
watchful hawkeyed cruel priests at Jerusalem (as reported in Dead Sea
Scrolls), because Jesus was sure of the support that he could muster
from the equally powerful Buddhist Empire of the Kushanas (See Bible.
Math. 47:53).
While being under arrest, and his supporters led by Peter, tried to
challenge the Roman gladiators, Jesus stopped his men to drive a
doctrinal point, "Those who unsheathe their swords, will get killed by
the very sword," and reminded them of the great compassion (Metta) that
one need cultivate even against the cruel enemies.
Buddhist Empire
But Jesus did not hide the fact, "that if he wishes he can get
thousands of angelic forces from the kingdom of his father to rescue
him, "probably alluding at the powerful armies of the Kushana Emperor
Kanishka who had established the most formidable Buddhist Empire after
Asoka of India and before Kublai Khan of Mongal China.
Jesus, thus took the message of this neo-Buddhism with the Buddha
elevated to the position of an 'Eternal Supreme Divine Ruler' to his
home country the Judea region (former Arabah) where even during Jesus
time, the monastic establishments and shrines would have definitely
flourished under the eremites who lived in cave sanctuaries and followed
saintly hermit lives around the Dead-sea littoral.
Dead-Sea Scrolls
It would be interesting to refer to the hermit monks known as 'Essenes'
who lived in caves and grottoes around the Dead sea region and the
discovery of religious scriptures written on parchments from sanctuaries
near the Dead sea and referred to as 'Dead Sea Scrolls'.
After nearly five centuries of the establishment of Sinai (or Esseni)
Buddhist Church by Ven. Punna Mahathra, it could be presumed that there
could have been a substantial number of followers of the great Alaha,
the supreme compassionate father and his peaceful 'Doctrine of
righteousness', even at the time of Jesus, both within Israel and in
Arabia Proper.
The Peshitta
It would not have been impossible for Jesus Christ to gather a large
number of followers to his teachings which are based on the old original
doctrine 'Saddharma' of the Buddha the great Arahan (Alaha), emphasising
compassion and wisdom (metta and Prajna) as found in the Old Aramaic
scriptures, the Peshitta, yet with a new emphasis by Jesus Christ and
his apostles on the concept of the Buddha elevated far above that of
Jehowah, the creator God of Torah. This is clearly reflected in the New
Testament teachings of Jesus Christ.
The new teachings of Jesus must have brought shock waves on
traditional Jews who during the pre-Christian centuries have been
successful in curbing the extraneous Peshitta Scriptures and driving out
the 'Alaha' followers beyond their territories to mainland Arabia,
although they might have tolerated or were compelled to connive at some
of the Suna (Sinai) monks, later called Esenes, who followed Alaha's
Dhamma to remain within their territory as long as they confine
themselves to their cave dwellings and do not interfere with Jewish
mainstream religio-politics with a vibrant monotheistic orientation.
The Jewish opposition to Jesus Christ was so formidable and
unrelenting that the cunning Jewish priests (as was the case with many
priests all over the world) must have obtained political backing of the
Roman governors of the time to castigate Jesus as an apostate and also a
potential usurper who speaks and assures of a 'millennal kingdom of
peace and righteousness'.
Finally Jesus Christ had to pay the penalty on the cross, although
the Roman rulers were hesitant to take responsibility for executing
punishment on Jesus Christ.
Jesus Framed
The final scene of the crucifixion is so dramatically portrayed in
the Holy Bible, that anyone can understand how the vicious and cruel
Jewish priests who framed Jesus, were insisting on nothing less than
death penalty on him, while those who present were looking aghast.
One can easily surmise that not only Judas, but several others too
must have been bribed by the Jewish priests to cause harm to Jesus while
he was under arrest. Jesus's bold front before the Roman governor, shows
that he was not expecting injustice from them.
The Roman governor's wavering attitude to pass judgement on Jesus,
also shows that the Roman authorities too had a certain amount of fear
not to antagonise Jesus and his Alaha, now 'God' followers who can get
support from the imperial Kushanas who had by that time expanded their
empire right up to western border to Imperial Rome.
However unexpected, Jesus was crucified not by the Roman governor's
demand but by the demand of cunning and cruel Jewish priests.
The final words of Jesus Christ on the cross, Eli Eli Lama Sabachhami',
is a mystery phrase to Bible translators who brought such a great person
like Jesus to a very low pedestal and pointed out that Jesus was crying
in agony and seeking divine intervention on his behalf.
Grace of Buddha
Had Jesus, studied Buddhism in India, in a monastery of the Gandhara
empire somewhere in Kashmir, under emperor Kanishka's patronage, he
would never have sought the help of an unseen divine power, but would
have definitely sought the Sublime grace of Buddha, Dhamma and Sangha
(the Tri Ratna) as has been admonished by the Buddha Himself in the
famous Dhajjhagga Sutta.
We shall make the Bible translators enlightened, that what the great
Buddhaputtra (son of God) Jesus uttered on the cross, was nothing but
reminding himself of the great qualities of the Buddha as a means of
consolation and salvation from Sansaric bonds.
Therefore we declare that what Jesus had uttered was nothing but the
famous hymn in praise of the great God, the Supreme God, God of all
Gods, Devatideva, Brahmatibrahma. Buddha (Bodo-God) - 'Itipiso Bhagava
Araham Samma Sambuddho etc.' However Jesus was very weak and emaciated
after the severe and painful trial the Jews meted out to him.
Therefore the feeble words Jesus had uttered, would not have come out
through his lips properly or else, even if at all those words were
properly pronounced, due to the great commotion, the vast crowd in front
of the crucifixion, who were horrified to witness the grisly scene of
such a compassionate person being crucified, could not have understood
him.
Aramaic Bible
Therefore what was left for the Aramaic Bible scribes and their later
translators was a fraction of what Jesus had uttered.
The line as it is now found in the Holy Bible as: 'Eli Eli Lama
Sabachtami' can be compared with 'Araham Sammasambuddho' in original
Pali, which would have gone into Aramaic slightly differently during
Jesus' time, and could be surmised as, stood somewhat like 'Alaham Lamma
Samoccham' and gone to Greek scribes as 'Eli Eli Lama Sabocchami' and
had appeared in the English translations variantly.
If at all there were survivals of pockets of adherents of the
original followers of Buddhism of the Alaha (Araha) school as taught by
the great monk Ven. Punna to the people of Sinai - Arabah (Suna-Apranta)
region, when Jesus appeared in the scene (roughly the same area but
predominated by Jews, when the Arahabs were pushed into Arabia and Syria
by the time Jesus was born) surely they would have got confused with the
new concept of god (or Bod) as the supreme Omniscient Being, a divine
father of great compassion residing in an eternal cosmic realm, (the
Sukkhavati heaven of Mahayana Buddhism) and would have not supported
Jesus fully or acceded to his teachings.
Moreover the Alaha devotees of original Buddhism in Arabah too would
have by this time (nearly five centuries after Ven. Punna's mission to
Sunaparanta of ferocious people) dispersed far and wide owing to the
formidable opposition of Jewish-Jehowah followers and had themselves
settled down firmly in mainland Arabia and Syria and maintained the
(Bedouin) Arab religious identity as a formidable religious fraternity
opposing the Jewish-Jehowah worshippers.
Although the 'Alaha' worshipping Arabs did not approve of the new
theistic 'Boddo' or 'God' doctrine of Jesus, they seem to have tolerated
Jesus because his teachings on 'righteousness and compassion' and final
emancipation in the, 'kingdom of righteousness' tally well with the
teachings of the religion of Great Compassionate Almighty Alaha (Allah),
according to which one could reach a temporary heaven after death
through one's meritorious acts and reach the final blissful eternal
heaven by complete surrender to Alaha (Allah).
Undoubtedly Arabs and Jews both would have accepted Jesus as a
messenger of God and Alaha both. Even today Islam considers Jesus as a
messenger of Allah.
Up till recently, the Arab-Jewish religious rivalry, although both
communities trace their origin to the same ethnic stock, was a great
mystery to Islamic and Christian religious historians.
I am sure with our discovery of Alaha-Allah etymology in the original
Theravada Buddhist term Araha which is an epithet of the Buddha and the
Peshitta holy scriptures which preserved the name Alaha with reference
to the great divine father, this problem is now solved considerably if
not conclusively.
Jehowah of Jews
Our thesis is well substantiated by the fact that both Alaha (of the
Peshitta-Aramaic Christian scriptures) and Allah (of the Quranic-Arabic
scriptures) worshippers maintain that their compassionate God is one and
the same, Jesus and Mohammed were messengers of the same compassionate
God, who is the supreme ruler, the divine king of the 'Kingdom of
Righteousness' which is diametrically opposed to the Jehowah (of the
Torah-Hebrew scriptures) of the age-old traditional Jewish religion that
was prevailing in Sinai-Arabah region, centuries before both
Christianity and Islam originated in West Asia.
It could now be easily seen that in the first century AD this region
of Sinai-Arabah (Suna-Apara of early Buddhist texts) of West Asia saw
three different religious fraternities opposing one another and claiming
allegiance to their own Holy Scriptures, namely (1) the Jewish Torah,
(2) Christian Holy Bible (revised by Saul the former arch-enemy of
Christ followers, who was later named Paul) and (3) Pre-Islamic Aramaic
Peshitta Scriptures which later developed into Arabic Surah-Quran after
Prophet Mohammed, the son of Abud-Allah, the servant of Alaha (or Araha).
Even the very word Bible is a mystery word we may say.
The Jews do not have any Holy Scriptures by that name. Western
scholars have tried to trace the name 'Bible' from the Greek word 'biblios'
- which means papyrus bark used as a writing material or parchment
paper. If Bible means a reference to a book only, surely most.
If not all, of the books at that time must have been written on
papyrus and the Jews too could have used the word for their Holy
scriptures which too were written and preserved on papyrus parchments.
Peshitta-Bible-Torah
The original name of the Holy Scriptures of Aramaic speaking Jews
(not Hebrew speaking Jews) and Arabs both, was Peshitta and not Bible or
Torah. Why then the Christian Bible alone was named the Bible had to be
investigated and solved.
This is a great mystery and we hope our recent discoveries will throw
much light on the problem to solve this mystery. The translators of the
original Greek Bible based on old Aramiac Scriptures, (Aramaic was the
language used by Jesus himself, incidentally) state inter-alia.
"Had the Peshitta been made by order of one of the rival churches,
the others would have rejected it. But since all Christians, even the
Muslims in the Middle East, accept and revere the Peshitta text, it
proves beyond a doubt that it was in use many centuries before the
division of the Church."
The above facts show that the Holy scriptures as referred to by the
name Peshitta and accepted as sacred by Arabic speaking Moslems and
Aramaic speaking Jews and others of Middle East had nothing to do with
the Jewish Torah.
It is something entirely different and distinct from the Hebrew
Jewish Torah.
It is through our observations, that these Aramaic scriptures were
nothing but "Survivals of the original Buddhist teachings" of the Church
established by Ven. Punna Thera that we can solve the mystery of the
origin of not only Peshitta but also the three different sacred books -
Torah, Peshitta and the Holy Bible.
There is not much problem as to the genesis of the Jewish-Hebrew
Torah. The Holy Bible is of Christian origin after the peaceful mission
of the great personage Jesus Christ.
The problem now remains as to the origin of Peshitta based of the
worship of a Supreme Being by the name of Alaha.
If Peshitta was a compilation of Buddhist orientation or Buddhist
doctrinal matters, as we do suggest, it has to be proved. Peshitta is
the Aramaic name for the original Holy Scriptures. We quote: "This name
was given to this ancient and authoritative text to distinguish it from
other Bible translations - around 431-451 A.D.
Further "all Christians, even the Moslems in the Middle East accept
and revere the Peshitta. Peshitta is without dispute even earlier than
the writings of Bar-Dasan who was living in the second century Aramaic
was the mother tongue of Jesus Christ and He preached His gospel in
Aramaic".
Paul preached the Christian gospel written in Aramaic. His epistles
were written...when Christianity had spread into Syria and parts of near
East and India.
"The word Peshitta means true and original Doctrine. If we consider
carefully and critically the above remarks about the Peshitta text (or
the original versions of the existing Holy Bible, or to be more accurate
the proto-Bible) much facts can be gleaned to solve the mystery of the
Bible.
First and foremost, now we know that it was respected and revered by
the Christians and the Moslems both. It is quite unlikely that Jesus had
preached a new or revised doctrine of the Jewish religion and wish to
identify Torahic Jehowah with the Biblical God.
The great antipathy of Jews to Jesus Christ shows that His teachings
were not in conformity with their religious ideals and scriptures. On
the other hand if it was an entirely original doctrine of Jesus Christ,
it would not have spread so quickly in such an alien land, in a vast
area at the very first few decades after His death, namely, from Syria
through Middle East to India, as Peshitta authorities record.
Our view, is (which is also the view of recent research scholars who
have found substantial evidence of Jesus' connections with Buddhist
kingdoms of North West India of the period) that Jesus Christ was
preaching the doctrine of the Buddha to those very Semitic communities
who had already become adherents of Alaha (of Peshitta Scriptures), the
great Arahan Buddha, centuries ago with the mission of Ven. Punna to
Sinai-Arabah (Suna-Aparanta) region of the Nabettean monarchs.
Jesus and Mahayana Buddhism
However the teachings of Jesus seems not to be based on the Araha
ideal of original Buddhism. Jesus had seemingly emphasised the new
Buddhist doctrine as found in Mahayana Buddhism revised by Emperor
Kanishka and his immediate predecessors of the Kushana Empire that
spread throughout North-Western India into parts of Central Asia, Far
East and Middle East.
Thus when Jesus emphasised the Buddha as Cosmocrator, the Universal
Compassionate Father, such views would have been anathema to Jews of
Jehowah's religion.
On the other hand Jesus' God (Bod-Boddo) of the Eternal Blissful
Heaven (Sukhavati of Mahayana Buddhism) would not have been easily
understood by the original converts to Buddhism (those who held
Alaha-Araha as their great Omniscient Lord), who were by that time had
established in Arabia proper and other neighbouring kingdoms
sporadically.
Saul who changed his name to Paul (later St. Paul) must have been
either an honest and understanding convert to Jesus' teachings of Boddo
(God) as Cosmocrator, or else a cunning Jewish priest who wished to
compromise with the Jews as well as with the Roman Caesars by presenting
the new Christian Theology as an off-shoot of old Jewish religion of
Jehowah worshippers which will not be a great threat to Roman religious
institutions based on age-old thesistic concepts such as Jupiter (Zeus),
Adonis, Venus, Hermes, Bachchus, Eros, et al.
Whatever the case may be, original teachings of Jesus Christ had to
face great challenges and resulted in revisions and alterations, after
several synods and colloquiums held by the Christian church fathers,
before being acceptable to the rulers of Rome and their religious
hierarchy to become one with the "Holy Roman Empire" which proved to be
not so holy.
The very word 'Peshitta' for the Aramaic-Christian or proto-Christian
canon can be traced back to an original Buddhist word for Lord Buddha's
teachings, namely 'Bhashita' which means What was spoken or the
'original word', 'Truth' and is also known as 'Buddha Bhashita'.
The word "Peshitta" means "straight, sincere, true that is "the
Original" and given to the ancient authoritative text to distinguish if
from the other Bible revisions and translations.
Persian Empire
Our contention that Buddhism in its original doctrinal form had
spread along the Great Northern Highway, the Uttharapatha to several
other kingdoms and regions outside India, during the very life time of
the Buddha can be further substantiated if we analyse the religion of
Ahura Mazda preached by Zoroaster in the Persian Empire of Achaemendis
(present day Iran).
The God of Zoroaster was "Ahura Mazda". Zoroaster was a contemporary
of Gautama Buddha and was born around 570 B.C. according to ancient
Iranian historiographical chronology.
The word "Ahura Mazda" has very close resemblance to "Arahan Buddha"
which name had already spread beyond Arabia towards the Sinai-Jerusalem
region through Ven. Punna's mission and to the very heart of Achaemendi-Iran
through the very first lay disciples of the Buddha, namely the two
caravan leaders Tapassu and Bhalluka.
It had been found that the birth place of Bhalluka was the township
Bhalk a border township on the great trunk route Uttharapatha, close to
or within the then achaemenid Empire.
The great Achaemenid (Persian) emperor Xerxes says: "That Ahura Mazda
made his father Darius the Great, king of kings, while his grandfather
Vishtaspa and great grandfather Rshama were both alive.
Zoroaster can thus be considered as a learned convert, a noble
disciple of the great Ahura Mazda (Arahan Buddha) when Buddha visited
these kingdoms beyond the north-west frontier of India, and preached the
Good Doctrine "Zad Sparam" as found in the Avesta which is nothing but
the "Sad Dharma" the Noble Doctrine of the Buddha.
The Arab historian, Mazudi (A.C. 956), states that king Histaspas's (Vishtaspa,
grandfather of Emperor Xerxes) residence was in the city of Balkh, the
capital of Bactria.
In my article on Balkh (which appeared in the "Encyclopedia of
Buddhism") and ancient site where very early Buddhist monuments have
been discovered, I have referred to the fact that the first two lay
disciples of Lord Buddha namely, Tapassu and Bhalluka the caravan
traders, had hailed from Balkh and had come through the northern high
way (Uttharapatha) to India and met the Buddha.
The two brothers became the first two lay disciples of the Buddha, by
surrendering themselves before the Lord (see supra).
King Vishtaspa could have definitely heard of the Buddha and His "Saddharma"
through such caravan leaders and other travellers. Zoroaster the Iranian
too must have become a noble disciple of the Buddha having listened to
the Buddha and understood His teaching (Saddharma).
Zoroaster a Buddhist
If the very first lay disciples of the Great Buddha were also
Bactrians from Balkh, it is not unlikely that Zoroaster also had met the
Buddha himself like the West Asian Ven. Punna the Arab (or Jew), who was
a caravan leader himself from far away Sinai-Arabah (Suna-Apara).
According to the same historian, "Zoroaster converted Vishtaspa, the
father of Darius the Great and brought the kingdom under Righteousness",
also "the deliverer of the imperilled Empire with great wisdom and
efficiency."
The date of Zoroaster is further confirmed by the Roman historian
Ammianus Marcellinus (cir. 360 A.C.), who says, "about the Magi and holy
rites.... to this science the Bactrian Zoroaster made many contributions
and after him the wise king Hystaspes, the father of Darius,"
...."Therefore it is possible when a date around 570-493 B.C. is
assigned to Zoroaster lends some support."
Incidentally, we may suggest that it could be quite possible that the
three Magi who visited baby Jesus and advised Joseph and Mary to flee
from possible Jewish dangers were either Zoroastrian Buddhist monks of
the original Alaha (Araha) Buddhist group of Zoroaster's founding or
Buddhist monks of Punna's group from Arabia.
However, the above statements further confirm that Zoroaster was a
Bactrian from Balkh, the place of origin of the very first, two lay
disciples (Tapassu and Bhalluka) of our Lord Bhagavat Buddha.
Furthermore it is stated that "Airan-vej' the place where Zoroaster was
born, "was in the direction of Ataropatakan (Azervaijan)."
"Ataropatakan" can easily be identified as an early Iranian term for
the eponymous "Uttarapatha", the Great Northern Highway which ran
through ancient Iran via Balkh in Bactria, in north-western part of
India, and connected Middle India up to Sri Lanka through Dakshinapatha
(Dekkan) the Great Southern Highway.
According to Zoroaster's biography, he was taken to Ahura Mazda (Arahan
Buddha) by an arch angel named 'Vohu Manah'. It is likely that Vohu
Manah may have been a great disciple of the Bhagavat Buddha. We may
identify 'Vohu Manah' tentatively with 'Moggalana' the Great Buddha's
chief disciple along with Sariputta.
On the command of Ahura Mazda, Zoroaster went to meet king Vishtasp
(father of the great monarch, emperor Darius) and converted him.
The above passages suggest that Ahura Mazda (Arahan Buddha)
personally instructed Zoroaster at a very friendly level and that
incident was not a mysterious divine intervention as some modern writers
and pundits try to interpret without giving any thought to the
historical background, and the political episodes that took place in the
Achaemenid Imperial Court, and also the unforgettable geographical
factor, the northern Highway Uttarapatha ("Ataropatakan" in ancient
Persian), that linked northern India and Persia.
Light of Asia
As modern historians' interpretations go Zoroaster's founding of fire
temples does not necessarily mean that the Zoroastrian religionists were
fire-worshippers.
They must have definitely lighted oil-lamps, and burnt incense,
joysticks etc., in honour of the Great Compassionate Lord, the Bhagavat
Buddha, the Supreme Light ("The Light of Asia" as Sir Edwin Arnold said,
the flame of fire, the symbol how the Buddha was aniconically
represented in pre-Christian art and sculpture), because Zoroaster's
teachings do not speak of fire-worship, or any invocation or incantation
to a fire-god as the "Agni" cult of Indian Brahmins.
Zoroaster's teachings are nothing but an emphasis on "Great
Righteousness" like in the case of emperor Asoka's conversion to
Buddha's doctrine of "Great Righteousness". Few religious terms of
Zoroaster's teachings as recorded in the Holy Text "Avesta" can easily
help, even a modern day Buddhist layman, to understand the similarity of
these doctrinal terms of Avesta with original Buddhist Textual terms, as
for example, the selections of the book "Arda Virad" are called 'Zad-Sparam"
which can be easily compared with the Buddha's noble Doctrine "Sad
Dharma".
The Holy Text 'Avesta' can be compared with the Buddhist term 'Vastu'
or 'Vattu', e.g. Katha Vattu, and many Sanskrit Buddhist texts with name
ending "Vastu" e.g. Maha Vastu.
The holy hymns or the stanzas of the sacred text Avesta are called 'Gathas'
which is exactly the term used in original Buddhist texts and never
found in contemporary religious texts of India or Vedic of Hindu origin.
The founder as well as expounder of 'Righteousness' (Zad Sparam) in
the imperial court of the great Achaemendids, the revered Guru Zoroaster
was however killed by his rivals, the enemies of the new religion, may
be at the instigation of the cunning Jews as well as greeks, at the
Imperial Court of the Persian monarch, who in subsequent centuries
abetted with the Greek Alexander to spell doom to Persepolis and with
the Roman Governor Herod to kill Jesus Christ.
When Zoroaster was killed, his temples and all his religious
scriptures were put into flames. This shows that the killings of
Zoroaster was an act of religious fanaticism. But the Doctrine of Ahura
Mazda the Supreme Lord, the Great Compassionate Arahan Buddha, as we now
dare to indentfy Him with Ahura Mazda, prevailed in Pesia for nearly 300
years until the last of the Acheamendid emperors Darius II was killed
and his city Persepolis, the metropolis, the metropolis of a universal
emperor who ruled a vast empire from Mediterranean sea up to the
Himalayas in "Righteousness", the pride of whole Asia was totally
destroyed and ruthlessly burnt with all her buildings, religious
scriptures and monks and monasteries by the vicious, bellicose Alexander
the Greek who set forth from Greece having murdered his own father and
mustering only 20,000 (twenty thousand) foot soldiers to meet the
mightly Persian army of 600,000 (six hundred thousand soldiers).
Alexander in hell
In the ancient Iranian (Persian) records, this pathetic story is
mentioned thus: "Alexander had destroyed all priests and learned men and
self destroyed and he fled to hell".
Sir Mortimer Wheeler, the British archaeologist in his 'Flames over
Persepolis' explains well, how the Greeks, possibly with their West
Asian allies among whom were Jews and others in Sinai-Jerusalem region
(who opposed the new religion of Alaha worshippers that was again
spreading fast with the backing of Imperial Achaemendis) had first
destroyed the frontier Satrapies of the Persian Empire like Egypt, Syria
etc., and then gradually penetrated into Persia proper.
In the initial stages of Alexander's campaign against Egypt and
Syria, and Jews would have given him the fullest support to resolve old
scores.
The Greeks and Jews who lived within Persia as both prisoners of war
and mercenaries and served in the Persian army and navy too, would have
acted as spies to help the combined forces of Alexander and his Jewish
allies to penetrate deeper into the heart of Persia, without much
difficulty and made a sudden onslaught at Persepolis, like Prince Vijaya
did to Lankapura (the prehistoric capital city of Sri Lanka around 550
B.C.).
All these historical episodes prove beyond doubt, one salient fact,
namely, although Buddhism the compassionate teachings of the Buddha for
the establishment of righteousness (Saddharma) through moral order and
mental culture, attracted to it vast crowds and was appealing to the
intellectual community of the day, like the proto-Arabian Nabetean
Kings, Syrian monarchs, emperors like Darius, Xerxes of Persia, Asoka of
India, the Selucid and Bactrian Greek Kings like Minander (of
Milindapanha fame), Kanishka the mighty Scythian-Kushana emperor,
Devanampiyatissa of pre-Christian Sri Lanka, et al, and proved itself to
be a great civilizing factor, yet it also proved to be a disastrous
factor to great Kingdoms and empires to change from traditional jingoism
to peace-making and peace-keeping with their powerful military machines
put into cold-storage.
Buddhist Kingdoms
Miliary men and belicose war-lords, masquerading as peace-makers and
peace-keepers, as in the present day, found easy access to those great
peace loving, peaceful centres of civilization of Buddhist Kingdoms and
also took the opportunity to pay off old scores.
Alexander's conquests were not mere expression of gaining territorial
expansion for the constricted Greek city states. It was also an attempt
to check the tide of a new philosophy or a new moral order for the
world, the "Doctrine of Universal Peace", of the Lord of Peace "Santi
Nayaka", the Buddha Sakyamuni, that was gaining ground and fast
spreading, with the backing of the most powerful empire of the day, the
Achaemenid Empire of Persia, throughout the vast Persian Empire's
Satrapies and the Iands around and across the great northern highway-Uttarapatha-
that linked the East and the West.
(To be continued) |