Sarath Ambepitiya - 'the perfect Voet Inner'
On March 31st, members of the Voet Inn Association and the present
day Voet Inners will gather in Voet Inn to unveil a portrait of the late
Voet Inner Sarath Ambepitiya, the High Court Judge of Colombo
assassinated on November 19, 2004. Late Judge's immediate family has
been invited to attend this commemorative function which is a first of
its kind in Voet Inn history.
Voet Inn is the name bestowed by the Council of Legal Education to
the Law hostel established in May 1949 to accommodate law students of
the Ceylon Law College. Voet Inn is a hybrid word coined by the Council
combining the names of Roman Dutch Jurist Johannes Voet and British Inns
of courts.
Since 1949, over thousand legal and judicial luminaries, spread
around the island, have passed through the portals of Voet Inn. Voet Inn
Association is the network of past Voet Inners established in 1986 to
foster and sustain close friendship between past and present day Voet
Inners.
Late High Court Judge Sarath Ambepitiya was a Voet Inner from 1974
until he passed out as an Attorney-at-Law in 1978. He was a founder
member of the Voet Inn Association and at the time of his assassination
he was the trustee of the Association.
He participated in all the activities of the Association helping the
young Voet inners to develop competency and ethical standard as lawyers.
He was a symbol of correct judicial temperament and discretion. Only
occasions he relaxed were when he was with his Voet Inn friends and
participated in numerous excursions visiting outstation Voet Inners.
The last trip he participated in was a Voet Inn trip to Kalutara in
August 2004 on the occasion of the donation of a new football stadium to
the public by Voet Inner, Manilal Fernando. late Judge was accompanied
on this trip by Inspector Upali who too was assassinated along with the
Judge.
The assassination of a High Court Judge in his own car port when
returning from court is unprecedented in the judicial history of this
country. The entire nation grieved at his death and the legal community,
judges, lawyers and court staff attended his funeral in unprecedented
numbers.
The funeral oration delivered by High Court Judge Rohini Perera was
heart rending and poignant where she said, "We as judges of this land
must take the lead from our departed friend and colleague that no
bullets of any calibre, knives of any depth, clubs of any weight shall
ever deter us from taking the exalted and well traversed path to do
justice for all those who came before us".
Late Judge Sarath Ambepitiya was respected as a fearless, courageous
and an independent judge. He had pronounced judgements in cases where
powerful and vindictive persons were charged. He treated everyone
equally according to law. He never allowed his personal prejudices to
influence his judgments.
Did he die in vain? Has the protection of Sri Lankan judges improved
as a result of his supreme sacrifice? Certain important steps, however
inadequate, have been taken to provide greater physical protection to
judges.
As a knee jerk reaction to the judge's assassination, the
controversial death sentence, implementation of which was suspended for
years was promised to be reimposed. But is that enough? What about
arresting the trend to "kill" the image and credibility of the judiciary
by unrestrained, generalized criticism of the judges. We should remember
that generalized attacks affect the judiciary and judicial independence.
The judges have no means of public defense. They cannot furnish
affidavits denying allegations or give media interviews defending their
conduct or judgements.
They cannot file cases for defamation. When generalized criticism
emanate from the privileged, the judes' predicament becomes even worse.
If the judges are guilty of misconduct there are judicial and
constitutional provisions to deal with them.
On their part, judges should also be considerate in making judicial
strictures from the Bench as targets of such strictures are also
defenceless. However, if we do not protect our judges both physically
and institutionally, the ultimate casualty would be the entire justice
system and the Rule of Law.
Voet Inners, wherever they are, will do what they can to ensure that
their fellow Voet Inner, High Court Judge Sarath Ambepetiya did not die
in vain.
- S.S. Wijeratne |