Points the world should ponder on
When the UN
system was brought into being in 1945, it was primarily designed
to prevent war and conflict in the world. That was the aftermath
of the Second World War which claimed lives in the tens of
millions and perpetrated unprecedented devastation over the face
of the earth. Mankind, at that time, was more than eager to bid
goodbye to the dreadful institution of war. The UN Charter was
seen as the ideal blueprint for a world where conflicts and
rifts among humans would be resolved by peaceful means, such as,
dialogue and a meeting of minds.
It is decades since this new world order was conceived and
given concrete shape to a degree, but war has continued to dog
mankind at his heels and is still being ravenously resorted to
by particularly the more powerful members of the international
community, thus rubbishing the vision of a peaceful world
underlying the UN system and its Charter. All of this, however,
in no way invalidates the UN system and its principal vision and
policy trajectory. A world free of conflict and war must be
striven for on the part of all who have won membership of the
UN.
President Mahinda Rajapaksa’s address to the UN General
Assembly last Friday, was of profound relevance because it drew
the attention of the world and of its leaders to some of these
founding principles of the UN. Sovereign equality among the
states of the UN, for instance, is a cardinal founding ideal of
the UN system. Under this order of things, there could be no
question of one state or states, coercing any other state or
states into doing their bidding. Since, peace is the motivating
ideal of the UN, conflicts among states need to be resolved
through the use of peaceful methods, such as, dialogue and
rational persuasion. This was, very correctly, underscored by
the Sri Lankan President.
But such golden rules of interaction among the world’s states
have been observed more in the breach, particularly on the part
of those states which have emerged as the predominant military
and political powers of the world, and the post Second World War
new world order is shown up as having nothing particularly new
to offer. Nevertheless, we believe that the UN and its
principles should be abided by in this highly imperfect world of
ours because international anarchy could only result in the
states of the world doing each other mortal, irreparable harm.
By saying this we do not intend to imply that the UN system
has proved ineffective. Far from implying so, we wish to place
on record that the UN specialized agencies in particular, have
done yeoman service for the powerless of the world over the
decades and are continuing very courageously to do so. For these
reasons, the UN continues to earn the gratitude and admiration
of the poor and powerless.
But there is no ignoring the need for UN reform and we
believe that it is up to the powerful members of the UN system
to address these needs. By reform we do not only have in mind
fundamental reforms, such as, the sufficient enlargement of the
UN Security Council to enable it to reflect the current global
military and economic balance, but also what President Rajapaksa
in his UNSG address referred to as ‘inconsistent standards and
discriminating approaches that can unintentionally give a fresh
lease of life to the forces of terror.’
Since the collapse of the Cold War and the emergence of what
is called a ‘multi-polar’ world, self interest has been
increasingly driving the states of the world in an unprecedented
way. Self-interest has always been a motivating factor in the
behaviour of states, but this trend could be expected to
accelerate after the collapse of the relatively rigorous
structures which held the world together in the Cold War days.
This is not in any way an endorsement of the Cold War world
order, but an emphatic reminder that the world needs to conduct
its relations on the basis of impartiality, justice and equality
if the world political order is to be prevented from descending
into greater anarchy and disorder.
In the case of Sri Lanka, there is no doubt that she is being
unfairly treated over the Darusman Report and the resultant
issues. Sri Lanka has exercised its inalienable sovereign right
to defend its territorial integrity by defeating the LTTE and
the powerful of the world would be only giving the LTTE and its
supporters a new lease of life by unjustifiably faulting Sri
Lanka. In other words, terror is being given a fillip. This is a
warm invitation to greater international disorder. |