Trojan Horse: Going back to the Greeks
Marina Warner
The way the Greek myths have been told has disguised the joins and
touched up the weirdness. Writers like Nathaniel Hawthorne in Tanglewood
Tales and Charles Kingsley in The Heroes, who enthralled me when I was a
child devouring the stories under the bedclothes by torchlight, patched
and pieced the myths into the coherent plots that we are familiar with.
Writers continue to work a ragbag of scraps into whole cloth,
disentangling the threads and recomposing the patterns. Very few readers
today go back to the sources, to handbooks like Apollodorus’ The
Library, or to the work of Quintus of Smyrna, who in the fourth century
wrote a sequel to the Iliad in 14 books.
When one does attempt to read these works, it’s often disappointing
to find how little their authors tried to shape the stories: some just
set down events like clerks in a court of law tallying ‘celestia crimina’,
heavenly crimes, as Ovid calls them.
Trojan Horse |
When you look up the first known mention of this or that strand in a
myth, it’s hard to keep in mind that it might have been noted 700 years
before the next passage was set beside it to form a consistent plot.
Who remembers that Homer mentions only in passing the Judgment of
Paris, when Paris’ choice of Aphrodite over Hera and Athena sparked the
war in heaven that set in train the Trojan War? Or that the famous
episode when the Trojan Horse is smuggled into Troy does not take place
in the Iliad and isn’t fully dramatised in the Odyssey, but is known
chiefly from the Aeneid, written centuries later by a Roman with a
political agenda.
Homer could assume that his audience knew the outline of the myth of
Helen of Troy, and that in consequence he didn’t need to lay it all out.
But perhaps there never was a consistent and complete version of any
myth, one that you could walk all the way around and find that
everything matched and agreed from every angle.
In the 17th century, the grandest patrons like Cardinal Mazarin and
Cardinal Richelieu had their classical sculptures lavishly repaired,
with porphyry and gold additions to re-create a lost limb or a missing
nose.
This kind of mending is completely out of fashion now: restorers
prefer to make their own work distinguishable and even reversible so
that the original state can be recovered if wanted. But a desire for
authenticity hasn’t shaped the critical approach to the ruins of
stories, except in studies like this one, which pays out the multiple
strands in the myth of Helen of Troy.
Greek tragedy, Jean-Pierre Vernant wrote, presents its protagonists
as objects of debate, not examples of good conduct or even heroes
deserving of sympathy; the same can be said of characters in epic, like
Helen.
Laurie Maguire’s literary biography of Helen of Troy makes us face up
to moral ambiguities as it tracks the most beautiful woman in the world
across time and across media, from Homer to Hollywood, as her subtitle
has it.
Since historians can find no trace of the real Helen on a coin, a
stone or in a factual document, the search for her leads only to dreams
and fantasies. Bettany Hughes attempted an archaeological quest in her
Helen of Troy (2005), but was left wistfully hoping that Helen’s tomb
might be discovered one day.
Maguire finds traces of Helen of Troy everywhere, far beyond the
poems and plays in which she is a character, but an individual Helen
disappears, to emerge as the embodiment of a fundamental principle:
absolute beauty.
In Homer’s epics, in the Faust story taken up by Marlowe and in
Goethe’s long, eccentric poetic drama about the same legend, Helen of
Troy makes readers and audiences think about different issues: the good
of beauty, the reasons for war, eroticism and women’s sexuality,
responsibility and love.
Maguire considers what is meant by Helen’s beauty, what her history
was, how much she was to blame (was she abducted by Paris or did she go
willingly?), and what implications her story has for women at different
times.
Her book is packed with enthusiastic reading and looking, at
little-known classical material (Quintus of Smyrna) and at her own
academic specialism, Elizabethan literature (John Lyly gives Helen a
scar on her chin – the equivalent of the flaw in a Ming vase that
perfects it).
The book opens with the Iliad and closes with Derek Walcott’s
novel-like epic poem Omeros, in which Helen is a servant in the house of
Major and Mrs Plunkett, colonials in the Caribbean; this Helen wears a
yellow dress which she has either been given by her mistress or stolen
from her, a dress whose colour recalls the golden robes worn by the
divine Helen of Troy, woven for her by her mother, Leda. But such
continuities are only intermittent.
Maguire treats dozens of retellings: one mythographer has an immortal
Helen marry Achilles in the Underworld, while Thomas Heywood describes
her killing herself for her sad grey hairs.
Maguire has kept her survey within bounds by setting aside the
political uses of Helen of Troy, even though these flourished in the
Elizabethan period; she has also set aside the dramatic or performance
history, though she can’t resist the temptation to describe various
manifestations of Helen on stage and film, including the first stark
naked one (seen by the audience chastely from the back), by Maggie
Wright in an RSC production of Marlowe’s Dr Faustus.
Such economies are prudent, but the boundaries between
representations of Helen and of the politics of war keep collapsing, and
it’s a pity to ignore the sharp and timely elements in Helen’s story
that have inspired numerous recent dealings with the matter of Troy, as
in Tony Harrison’s Hecuba, when the chorus curses:
I pray as a small revenge
For all our dead and for Troy’s burning
Helen ends up as a refugee.
Ever since Mephistopheles summoned a devil to delude Faust into
believing that Helen of Troy stood before him and would make him
immortal with a kiss, there has been something fugitive about her; for
Maguire, her beauty, being absolute, cannot be grasped, and so leaves
desire famished, unappeased.
Helen of Troy comes to represent, not an ideal worth dying for, but a
gap in meaning, a vanishing. ‘This book, like the Trojan narratives that
it explores,’ Maguire writes, ‘is a study of absence, lack, gaps,
ambiguity, aporia, and the narrative impulse to completion and closure.’
In this respect, Maguire is setting herself against the synthesising
and reparatory impulses of recent fictional or poetic interpreters of
Greek myth: tellingly, she quotes another critic’s remark, that the
famous lines by Marlowe, usually declaimed in rapture, can be read as
inflected with irony and doubt: ‘Was this the face that launched a
thousand ships?’
One version of the myth that Maguire doesn’t mention nevertheless
illuminates her argument that Helen’s labile and phantasmic state shapes
our vision of her.
According to this version, Helen never sailed to Troy with Paris, but
was spirited away to Egypt, where she spent the war years as a priestess
of Artemis.
The Helen who went to Troy was an eidolon, which duped the Trojans
and the Greeks alike. They fought over an illusion. This strand of the
myth is very ancient: the poet Stesichorus, active in the sixth and
seventh centuries BC, suggested it after he was blinded by the gods for
defaming Helen.
He retracted his accusations in a palinode that is less a chivalrous
defence of Helen (and womankind) than a brilliant indictment of the
folly of war – and of men.
To be continued |