CONSPIRACY 'THEORIES' ARE
REAL
A writer who specializes on the subject of the seamier side
of American (U.S) politics wrote this week that the U.S
surveillance programmes that are the subject of worldwide
scrutiny these days after the Snowden story broke, may not
bother some U.S citizens who believe that they are fine and
secure, as long as they have nothing to hide.
He says however that this sense of security is an illusion.
That's so because the U.S National Security establishment keeps
altering the paradigm. For example, he says people thought that
anti-war protests in the 60s were legitimate activities that
fell under the description of 'permissible' civil protest. That
was until one fine day such protests were abruptly held to be
pro-communist and therefore evil activity by the U.S
Establishment!
He writes that the same modus operates today. Green activists
and anti-surveillance protestors and sundry others are suddenly
labeled as terrorists in Obama's America.
That seems to be the way however, that a certain club of
nations operates against the other countries and their interests
as well. Take the Indo-Lanka Accord. When that alleged legal
instrument was imposed on this country in the 80s, the U.S
Establishment led by the key U.S opinion makers in the
Washington Post, the New York Times etc, wrote that the pact
represents an act of hegemonic aggression by a large nation
against a smaller neighbour.
Today, the U.S led Western club of nations have forgotten
that early assessment and 'changed the goalposts' for Sri
Lanka's post-war success. Their leaders did the complete about
turn, to take up the position that reconciliation in Sri Lanka
is complete if and only if the Sri Lankans implement fully the
provisions of the 13th Amendment, which was the legislative
instrument piggybacked on the Indo-Lanka Accord.
No country in these people's crosshairs can ever be an
exemplar of good governance it seems, as what's deemed good
governance today is deemed reprehensible tomorrow, and totally
inadequate the day after.
It is simple. Within a country everybody can be made a
criminal if the Establishment keeps changing the laws each day,
or redefining what is proper behaviour, and in the world, every
country can be made a pariah state if they keep redefining
what's good governance and effective 'conflict resolution', for
example.
A word here is due about all those Sri Lanka opinion makers
and so called dissident busybodies including media men and women
who have been saying that in Sri Lanka we are all enamoured with
conspiracy theories. They say that the Sri Lankan defence
establishment for instance cries conspiracy theory for
everything, and justifies every arrest or every preventive
detention by a reference to some sort of a 'conspiracy.'
Snowden's revelations show however that conspiracy theories
are not theories any longer. Big brother IS watching - now, is
that a conspiracy theory?
Can Mr. Paikiasothy or any of those banshees in the
breast-beat circuit who go behind the U.S to try and crucify the
war-winning Sri Lankan Armed Forces please respond to that? U.S
surveillance -- now exposed -- the keeping of phone records and
spying on foreign leaders, including those of the E.U, is this
all part of the grand conspiracy theory or is it not?
The answer to that, dear reader, is blowing in the wind. The
theory about the 'conspiracy theory' has unraveled fast. The
Snowden issue and its fallout show the devious ways of U.S
Imperialistic control and when the lid is blown on the myth that
'conspiracy theories' are false, the word Imperialist also gains
currency, if the reader gets the drift of that extrapolation...
What has been considered 'beyond the pale' in polite
discourse so-called is very much within the ambit of what's
germane for discussion today. It is settled: Conspiracy theories
are reality, they are no longer conspiracy theories. Clearly,
the goalposts keep changing, the game is rigged as far as global
control of the destinies of countries -- and their resources --
is concerned. This is the short end of that opinion. There is
much in the detail, that people have to educate themselves
about.
|