CALL OUT THE RECONCILIATION
WRECKERS NOW!
Reconciliation and reform are the two fronts on which
the Sri Lankan government is remiss, say the chorus of
negativists and plain hard-boiled naysaysers. How far is this
correct, if it is? It takes two to tango in the reconciliation
process, and it's worthwhile taking a glance at reconciliation
from the frame of reference of the Sri Lankan government.
For a community of political leaders that styles the
slightest criticism of the Tamil history of separatism as being
'vituperative', that kind of a characterization is rich. From
day one since the reconciliation process began the leaders of
the TNA and their cheer squads in Udayan etc., have had nothing
but vituperative rhetoric aimed at the elected government of the
people.
This vituperation has been at varying degrees both personal
invective aimed at the leadership, and grossly unfair commentary
aimed at the reconciliation process itself.
The Sri Lankan leadership has been vilified as being
chauvinist and insincere, even as a massive rehabilitation and
de-mining process took place in the former theatre of war,
despite a litany of cocksure negative predictions.
But yet the constant vituperative rhetoric has not stopped at
barbs aimed at the leadership at home. The Sumanthirans and the
Sambandans have gone abroad, sat down to sup with thinly
disguised terrorist front organizations such as the GTF
comprising of ex-terrorists, and let out a barrage of invective
against the state. Sumanthiran - it is no secret - led a
delegation that knocked on doors in London recently in an
attempt to coerce the CMAG to shift the CHOGM venue from
Colombo.
How does this aid the reconciliation process? But no --
buffoonish commentators writing all the way from Canada have
decided that nobody can say anything about the history of the
misguided Tamil separatist campaign, as that constitutes
vituperative rhetoric. But, to go by their book, Sumanthiran and
his cohorts can fire salvo upon salvo of the most vituperative
intemperate rhetoric against the government, and that does
nothing to subvert the cause of reconciliation!
The state is asked to clap with one hand, and 'reconcile'
with a rabidly ferocious Tamil leadership that does not let up
the slightest opportunity to denigrate the Sri Lankan leadership
because these people see 'reconciliation' as a one way street -
you pander to us, and we treat you like dirt.
For instance, these days they are getting a dose of the true
history of the Tamil separatism, the fact that before
standardization, before the so called colonization of Gal Oya
and allegedly Tamil areas, before any of the alleged
provocations by the so called Sinhala governments, Chelvanayakam
and others had decided on a separatist project.
Apparently, to point this out as Tamil racism is to be
vituperative! Certainly the person who points this out says
something about himself - more than he says about Chelvanayakam.
He says that he is not afraid to call a spade a spade, despite
regular shamans and snake oil salesmen who try all the way from
Canada, to skew the narrative and show up the government that
has done more than its bit for reconciliation as being
non-cooperative while the real reconciliation wreckers of the
TNA are painted as aggrieved and innocent babes in the woods.
This kind of skewing of narrative may have worked previously
with regimes that did not have the collective gonads to call out
this bluff. That does not obtain any more. Spades will be called
spades - not receptacles for slow excavation of earth. And no
mediocrity from Canada will be able to skew the narrative by
what he may consider, narcissistically and stupidly of course,
clever sleight of hand.
They also try to tell whoever may be listening that the
people of the North will vote based on considerations so trivial
as the characterization of past figures of the so called Tamil
liberation struggle who have been nothing more of course than
Tamil racists, such as Chelvanayakam. The people have better
ideas. They will vote based on current issues, and the better
deal for Tamils in the North. They might just yet be misled by
intimidation and the weight of peer pressure from the diaspora
lap-dogs, but a triumph made in this way would be a pyrrhic
victory, as the forces of development in the North will
assuredly eventually triumph, if not this year, several years
down the road... |