REPUTEDLY, A JUDGE …
Retired judge C. W. Vigneshwaran in a recent speech
tries to make a case to justify his recent outing at the so
called Bar Association convocation where he tried to undermine
the legal system of this country by making a case that a
pretender continues to be the Chief Justice. Vigneshwaran can
say what he wants, but his recent excuse for what he said
earlier at the convocation, now clearly puts him in a league of
his own as a charlatan.
His last speech was the Chelvanayakam memorial oration and
rather injudiciously he tried to make a case at the very outset
that certain quarters contended that he was pursuing an Eelam
project, when he was for the most part making a legal analysis
as a jurist about the recent impeachment.
Hilariously then he loses all perspective, and infers that
since a ‘tenuous connection’ was made between his analysis and a
possibility of pursuing an Eelam project, then that’s enough
reason to pursue an Eelam project.
At least that’s what can be clearly gleaned from the utterly
racist nature of the rest of his speech, of course made
appropriately in commemoration of that original unadulterated
Tami racist S. J. V. Chelvanayakam.
At the end of day when his speech is taken for what it is --
a racist rant -- any shred of doubt anybody would have
entertained that this man is a blanket no-holds-barred racist is
erased, and curiously, in one fell swoop Vigneshwaran manages to
obliterate any upstanding doubt about whether his legal
casuistry on the impeachment was about an Eelam project or not.
It is almost mind boggling the extent to which this ‘judge’,
apparently calling himself a jurist and an intellectual, spouts
the racist rhetoric of the Chelvanayakam-Ponnambalam brand. Who
wouldn’t remember that it was Ponnambalam that came up with the
curious 50-50 call for representation of Sri Lankan Tamils in
the Legislature?
Vigneshwaran, amazingly, almost betters Chelvanayakam and
Ponnambalam in rationalizing for a Tamil racist theory of Tamil
majoritarianism which is something that can only be a construct
of such an overtly racist mind.
He contends that the Tamils aren’t a minority in this
country, and that they are a majority, and he quotes or purports
to quote two former Sri Lankan Members of Parliament to drive
home the fact!
He also says that since the Tamils are a majority in their
areas, two Sinhala MPs promised a Tamil leader a Tamil seat in
Colombo but later reneged on their promise.
Perhaps a special insight is needed into Vigneshwaran’s
febrile mind to find out why if the Tamils are a majority in
their own areas, they also need a dedicated seat for the Tamil
community in Colombo, but when one is in a race to better the
old diehards Chelvanayakam and Ponnambalam in the race bating
game, there is no end to the contortionist positions a gentlemen
can take.
Vigneshwaran’s attempt at reduction i.e.: on the lines of ‘I
was charged with probably advancing an Eelam project, therefore
what’s the point I will become an Eelamist’ (he spouts Eelam
rhetoric after all by the bushel load) -- is symptomatic of the
grieving elite Tamil intelligentsia who seem to miss the days
when they used to dominate the majority Sinhalese under the
British.
As opposed to these ersatz intellectuals, one knows of the
real ones that are probably in the North today, trying hard to
come out of a war torn era of terrorist hegemony, to write
freely, and enjoy unfettered access to an intellectual milieu
that’s challenging and free from the deleterious effects of
violence.
Vigneshwaran exposes himself badly – he is in the tradition
of the Shiva Pasupathi, the former Sri Lankan Attorney General
who enjoyed all the benefits of the system and then became an
Eelamist, while the true Tamil intellectual giants are those in
the tradition of Rajini Thiranagama and others who would lay
down their lives to eschew the humbug of kowtowing to
Prabhakaran in the name of academic freedom. The Vigneshwarans
do the opposite; in the name of freedom, they prostate
themselves before Prabhakaran’s ghost and then cheer to the
racist drumbeat of that arch original racist bigot, S. J. V
Chelvanayakam. There is just one question left - with such
‘intellectuals’ who needs boors?
|