SMOKE, MIRRORS AND HUMAN RIGHTS
Minister Mahinda Samarasinghe said it correctly but politely.
Navi Pillay the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights sent her
advance team, saying they will be preparing the ground for her
own visit to the country on a later date.
The advance party was given all the facilities, and the
necessary documentation. But, there was no sign of Navi Pillay
after their departure. There is no sign of Navi Pillay yet,
except in Geneva, where she has pulled a bulky report out of her
bag - and who made the inputs to it, but the very same advance
team that was said to be preparing the ground for her own
planned trip?
The (UN) Office for the High Commission on Human Rights has
turned out to be a textbook case for sharp practice and
subterfuge. There is smoke and mirrors, cloaks and daggers
there.
Not the way in which a UN civil service organization is
supposed to conduct business, to put it mildly.
Since Navi Pillay generally gets her material from the NGOs
that pump her with disinformation at the rate of ten bags full
of type-written pages per hour, she really did not have to send
her fact finding delegation which was of course masquerading as
an advance squad for her own supposed visit.
But, she badly needed to say that her information was
obtained on the spot and first hand. The advance team gave some
much needed credence to her theories, to make them look fleshed
out and authentic, whereas in reality they were all based on NGO
fiction.
But the Sri Lankan delegation in that antiseptic Swiss city
of Geneva is doing what it is supposed to do - presenting a case
in a court that seems already to have prejudged the outcome.
However, this witch-hunt against Sri Lanka has to go on
record as one of the most odious in any kind of world body in
recent times.
This simply cannot go on. World bodies cannot be allowed to
rely on information obtained by paid NGO hands, in order to
begin dictating terms on issues that have to do with national
security for instance.
Take the issue of High Security Zones. The majority of these
zones have been vacated, and as Minister Samarasinghe says,
there are but a few HSZ's that remain, most of these also not
amounting to the kind of maximum security areas that people knew
about in the past. In Palaly for instance, restrictions have
been lifted, and civilians, for example, enjoy unrestricted
access to the airport.
How does the UN Human Rights Council mandate a government to
vacate the remaining High Security Zones, when the maintenance
of security in key installations is strictly a matter that the
government of the country is responsible for?
In other words, half of what the UN Human Rights Council is
discussing today does not fall under the rubric of human rights
in the first place.
As the Minister of External Affairs said recently, this is a
highly politicized body. Voting is done on the basis of power
blocks, and not on an assessment of the facts weighed on the
balance.
Sri Lanka however does not have the luxury of walking out of
the Council or terming it irrelevant the way Israel once did
because this country does not have superpower backers that step
in on the basis of parochial loyalties.
But the case against some countries to put it mildly, is
based on more than a modicum of truth, but it cannot be pushed
very far due to powerful actors. The case against other
countries by contrast, is trumped up and fabricated, as it is
against Sri Lanka, but is pursued vigorously due mostly to the
same powerful actors.
Who said colonialism was over, then? Today, we carry on our
front page, an independent assessment by a US congressman who
says his country's resolution should be withdrawn. But, on the
UNHRC floor, it's Showtime. Movies are being screened, novels
are being launched. There is hardly a moment for the intrusion
of hard reality there. |