Not jumping the gun
On
Thursday, hundreds of monks demonstrated outside the High Commission of
Bangladesh in Colombo in protest at the violent attacks on the Buddhist
community in the area of Cox’s Bazaar in Bangladesh.
The monks had gathered there to deliver a petition to the High
Commissioner protesting at destruction of Buddhist temples by mobs in
Southern Bangladesh. The protest was organised by the Bodu Bala Sena
(‘Buddhist Power Force’).
Unfortunately, during the course of the generally peaceful
demonstration, stones were thrown at the High Commission building,
smashing windows. The Police reported that one man was arrested for
criminal damage and that monks were not involved in the attack.
However, most foreign press reports of the demonstration headlined
the stoning of the High Commission rather than the non-violent protest.
The riots in Bangladesh which engendered the protest took place on
Sunday, starting from the Ramu sub-district of Cox’s Bazaar and
spreading throughout the area. A number of Buddhist monasteries
(reported variously between ten and twenty), including some which are
several centuries-old, and about 50 houses were reported to have been
torched. In addition, a Hindu temple had also been attacked.
Buddhist monasteries
The rioting occurred after a Buddhist youth was reported to have
posted photographs offensive to Muslims on the Internet. Police in the
area reported that the youth, Uttom Kumar Barua, had taken a photograph
of the holy Quran being trampled and uploaded it to his Facebook page.
Other sources said the pictures depicted pigs eating the holy book,
women standing on it and it being burned.
Bangladeshi monks studying Buddhism in Thailand display signs
and
pictures of destruction in their country as they hold a
demonstration
calling for an end to attacks against Buddhist communities in
Bangladesh,
in front of the United Nation’s regional office in Bangkok on
October
3, 2012. AFP |
They said that after the news spread, crowds, already agitated by the
American-made anti-Islam film Innocence of Muslims - attacked Buddhist
monasteries and houses.
The circumstances under which the riots took place are mysterious, to
say the least. Dhakha’s Daily Star quoted Uttom Kumar Barua as saying
that the photo was mistakenly tagged on his Facebook profile and that
his Facebook account was closed after the violence started. Uttom Kumar
Barua is a name fairly common among the Buddhist Jumma tribals who live
in the Chittagong area.
Furthermore, only two percent of Bangladesh’s population has access
to the Internet - many in the area do not even have electricity.
According to press reports, the news of the offensive Facebook photos
only circulated after they were sent to residents via mobile phone.
According to local people, the rioting had been instigated by
Rohingya agitators from neighbouring Arakan Myanmar (Burma). There are
about 300,000 Rohingya refugees in Bangladesh, who have fled what they
say is discrimination against them by the government. On the other hand,
the Al Jazeera correspondent said it was unlikely, as most Rohingyas
live in refugee camps. However, the Police stated that Rohingya
insurgents who had infiltrated across the border were
responsible. Interior Minister Mohiuddin Khan Alamgir has blamed
radicals for what he termed a ‘premeditated and deliberate’ attempt to
promote discord. Whoever was responsible, there is more to the incident
than meets the eye.
Religion-based aggression
The Chittagong area has been mainly peaceful since the 1997 signing
of the Chittagong Hill Tracts Peace Accord between Sheik Hasina’s
government and the Parbatya Chhatagram Jana Shanghatti Samiti (United
People’s Party of the Chittagong Hill Tracts) a political organisation
of the Buddhist tribals whose armed wing, the Shanti Bahini, had fought
a long war against government forces.
The language used by the Muslims who rioted in Bangladesh and that of
the Buddhists protesting in Colombo have been remarkably similar. A
madrassa teacher in Ramu was reported by Al Jazeera as saying ‘Muslims
in this community wanted justice and are fed up of being insulted.’
By way of comparison, the petition addressed to the Bangladesh High
Commissioner said ‘Enough is enough. We cannot tolerate the situation
any more’ (The Sinhala translation was even harsher: ‘We have been
patient quite long enough’).
This similarity in impatience is a sure sign that things have been
boiling far too long. It is necessary to step back and count to ten. It
is necessary to exercise tolerance - religious feeling runs high in the
sub-continent and religion-based aggression can lead to a spiral of
violence.
Buddhists in Sri Lanka should note that, in Bangladesh many of their
co-religionists fleeing the riots had taken shelter with their Muslim
neighbours. The authorities stepped in as soon as possible, arresting
over 160 rioters and ensuring the return of the displaced to their
homes. An investigation has been launched into allegations that the
officer-in-charge of Ramu police station had failed to ensure the safety
of Buddhists.
We should not jump the gun, but should wait to see what further
action the Bangladesh government takes. The stoning of the High
commission can only blacken Sri Lanka’s name at a time when its enemies
are faltering and in need of an issue to hang on to in the wake of the
closure of the Menik Farm camp for the displaced. Predictably, Eelamist
propaganda organs pounced on the stoning incident.
People of all faiths in Sri Lanka should note that the All Ceylon
Jamiyyathul Ulama has issued a media communique condemning the Cox’s
Bazaar attacks, calling on Bangladeshi Muslims to practice religious
tolerance, similar to that in Sri Lanka.
Significantly, the release said that ‘we recently witnessed the
release in the West of film which is a diabolical caricature of the Holy
Prophet. Hence, we share the sense of hurt felt by our Buddhist brothers
and sisters on account of this desecration and destruction of a temple
in Bangladesh.’
We should all bear in mind the words that President Mahinda Rajapaksa
spoke in Sanchi last month: ‘the great Emperor Asoka honoured and
supported all religions in his empire. He declared that one should not
honour only one’s own religion and condemn the religions of others, but
one should honour the faiths of others, as well.’ |