How to move out of the austerity trap?
Summary of World of Work Report 2012,
‘Better jobs for a better economy’ published by International Labour
Organization’s, International Institute for Labour Studies
Over the past year, labour markets have been affected by the slowdown
in global growth. This is all the more problematic because labour
markets had not fully recovered from the global crisis that erupted in
2008: there is still a deficit of around 50 million jobs in comparison
to the pre-crisis situation (Chapter 1). It is unlikely that the world
economy will grow at a sufficient pace over the next couple of years to
both close the existing jobs deficit and provide employment for the over
80 million people expected to enter the labour market during this
period.
The trends are especially worrying in Europe, where the unemployment
rate has increased in nearly two-thirds of these countries since 2010;
but labour market recovery has also stalled in other advanced economies,
such as Japan and the United States. Elsewhere, employment gains have
weakened in terms of the needs of a growing, better educated working-age
population, as in China. And jobs deficits remain acute in much of the
Arab region and Africa.
Labour market
Protests against austerity measures in Greece. File photo |
This is not a normal employment slowdown. Four years into the global
crisis, labour market imbalances are becoming more structural, and
therefore more difficult to eradicate. Certain groups, such as the
long-term unemployed, are at risk of exclusion from the labour market.
This means that they would be unable to obtain new employment even if
there were a strong recovery.
In addition, for a growing proportion of workers who do have a job,
employment has become more unstable or precarious. In advanced
economies, involuntary part-time employment and temporary employment
have increased in two-thirds and more than half of these economies,
respectively. The share of informal employment remains high, standing at
more than 40 percent in two-thirds of emerging and developing countries
for which data are available. Women and youth are disproportionately
affected by unemployment and job precariousness. In particular, youth
unemployment rates have increased in about 80 percent of advanced
economies and in two-thirds of developing economies.
Job instability is, above all, a human tragedy for workers and their
families; but it also entails a waste of productive capacity, as skills
tend to be lost as a result of excessive rotation between jobs and long
periods of unemployment or inactivity. More job instability therefore
means weaker productivity gains in the future and less room for
prospering and moving up the career ladder.
Advanced economies
The jobs deficit is going hand-in-hand with a prolonged investment
deficit - another sign that the crisis has entered a new phase. The
amount of uninvested cash in the accounts of large firms has reached
unprecedented levels (Chapter 4) while, in the case of advanced
economies, small firms continue to have difficulty accessing credit that
would allow them to invest and create jobs. Importantly, the Report
finds that investment has become more volatile, and that this has
exacerbated job precariousness in advanced economies as well as in
emerging and developing ones.
Finally, society is becoming increasingly anxious about the lack of
decent jobs. In 57 out of 106 countries, the Social Unrest Index,
developed for the purposes of this Report, increased in 2011 compared to
2010. Europe, the Middle East, North Africa and sub-Saharan Africa show
the most heightened risk of social unrest. On average, Latin America -
where there has been a degree of employment recovery and, in a few
cases, improvements in job quality - has experienced a decline in the
risk of social unrest.
Since 2010, and despite the job-friendly statements in successive G20
meetings and other global forums, the policy strategy has shifted its
focus away from job creation and improvement and concentrated instead on
cutting fiscal deficits at all costs. In European countries, cutting
fiscal deficits has been deemed essential for calming financial markets.
But even in countries which have not suffered from the effects of the
crisis this remedy is being applied for pre-emptive reasons - fiscal
deficits are being reduced to avert any negative reactions from
financial markets. This approach was intended to pave the way for
greater investment and growth, along with lower fiscal deficits.
Employment regulations
In addition, as part of the policy shift, the majority of advanced
economies have relaxed employment regulations and weakened labour market
institutions (Chapter 2), and more deregulation measures have been
announced. These steps are being taken in the hope that financial
markets will react positively, thereby boosting confidence, growth and
job creation.
However, these expectations have not been met. In countries that have
pursued austerity and deregulation to the greatest extent, principally
those in Southern Europe, economic and employment growth have continued
to deteriorate.
Developing countries
The measures also failed to stabilize fiscal positions in many
instances. The fundamental reason for these failures is that these
policies - implemented in a context of limited demand prospects and with
the added complication of a banking system in the throes of its 'deleveraging'
process - are unable to stimulate private investment. The austerity trap
has sprung.
Austerity has, in fact, resulted in weaker economic growth, increased
volatility and a worsening of banks' balance sheets leading to a further
contraction of credit, lower investment and, consequently, more job
losses. Ironically, this has adversely affected government budgets, thus
increasing the demands for further austerity. It is a fact that there
has been little improvement in fiscal deficits in countries actively
pursuing austerity policies (Chapter 3).
With regard to deregulation policies, the Report finds that they will
fail to boost growth and employment in the short term - the key time
horizon in a crisis situation. Indeed, the employment effects of labour
market reforms depend heavily on the business cycle.
In the face of a recession, less stringent regulation may lead to
more redundancies without supporting job creation. Likewise, the
weakening of collective bargaining is likely to provoke a downward
spiral of wages, thereby delaying recovery further.
In general, the Report confirms findings from earlier studies that
show there is no clear link between labour market reforms and employment
levels. Interestingly, within the range in which the majority of
countries lie, adequate employment regulations tend to be positively
associated with employment. Beyond that, badly designed regulations may
adversely affect labour market performance. In these cases, there are
grounds for considering reforms as part of social dialogue and in
conjunction with social protection measures. This policy has been
successfully pursued in the recent past in countries such as Austria and
Brazil.
Many emerging and developing countries pursued a strategy of boosting
domestic demand in order to compensate for weaker prospects for
exporting to advanced economies. There are signs that in some of these
countries, such as India, Latin America, South Africa and, more
recently, China, wages have grown to catch up with productivity. Public
investment and social protection have also been reinforced and regional
integration has proved helpful.
Nevertheless, even in these countries, labour markets and real
investment are not immune to the global economic weakening. Volatile
capital flows has also aggravated the instability of the real economy
and the possibility for creating better jobs. It is therefore crucial to
pursue further the present approach of boosting domestic demand,
complementing it with better enforcement of core labour standards and
measures to avoid destabilizing capital flows.
G20 countries
It is possible to move away from the austerity trap. Last year's
World of Work Report offered a three-pronged approach, which remains
valid today. First, labour market institutions should be strengthened so
that wages grow in line with productivity, starting in surplus
economies. In the current situation, consideration could be given to a
careful and coordinated increase in the minimum wage. Further efforts to
implement core labour standards would also be helpful, especially in
emerging and developing countries where gaps exist. Ratifying ILO core
Conventions in all G20 countries would give a positive signal in this
respect.
Second, it is critical to restore credit conditions and create a more
favourable business environment for small enterprises. The issue is
particularly pressing in the Euro-zone countries, where the policy of
the Central Bank to provide liquidity to banks has failed to boost
credit to the real economy. There may also be a case for higher taxation
of firms that do not reinvest profits, and/or lower taxation of firms
that emphasize investment and job creation.
Third, it is possible to promote employment while meeting fiscal
goals. The Report shows that a fiscally neutral change in the
composition of expenditures and revenues would create between 1.8 and
2.1 million jobs within one to two years. In the case of emerging and
developing countries, efforts should be centred on public investment and
social protection to reduce poverty and income inequality and to
stimulate aggregate demand. For advanced economies, the focus should be
on ensuring that unemployed people, especially youth, receive adequate
support to find new jobs.
More fundamentally, it is high time for a move towards a growth and
job-orientated strategy. This would help to coordinate policies and
avert further contagion caused by fiscal austerity. In Europe, the
strategy could include a coordinated approach to solving the debt
crisis, for which innovative funding mechanisms and improved utilization
of European Structural Funds - properly reformed in order to better
tackle present job deficits - would be instrumental.
Financial sector
The current policy approach reflects the premise that growth follows
austerity and that, in turn, jobs follow growth. According to this view,
the main thrust of efforts to date has therefore focused on cutting
deficits and restoring global growth to positive territory with the view
that, soon thereafter, job creation would follow. As a consequence, more
direct efforts to stimulate job creation and boost the incomes of those
most vulnerable to the crisis have been of secondary importance.
Since there are now indications that these premises have proved
counterproductive, it is vital to demonstrate that an alternative, job-centred
approach outlined above exists. It is also imperative to nurture this
alternative approach with concrete examples of policies that work, in
which ILO has played a key role via the adoption of the Global Jobs Pact
and could play a greater role as a forum for policy analysis.
Another factor at work has been the imbalance between the voice of
the real economy and that of the financial sector. Both are important,
but both need to be heard. To remedy this, consideration could first be
given to the creation of national employment and social observatories.
This step could help to identify an upper bound to the level of
unemployment beyond which new measures will be needed - in much the same
way as for inflation or fiscal targets. The task could be facilitated by
the establishment of independent and authoritative observatories to
monitor and forecast trends in the labour market, which could be charged
with providing independent evaluations of the employment impact of
policy proposals. Their remit would be to forewarn governments against
the adoption or continuation of policies that are unlikely to achieve
the unemployment goals.
Economic policies
Second, there is a strong case for establishing consultative national
forums, where economic and social policies are discussed by government
and the social partners. Although outcomes will not be binding, such
consultations can provide important feedback to governments on the
current state of the labour market and outlook for unemployment. The
forum could also play a central role in collaborating and consulting
with the national observatory or agency created to monitor and assess
labour market developments and policy impacts.
Finally, national efforts to shift to policies that will ensure
higher levels of employment will be greatly facilitated by reforms in
the governance of the global economy. The key objective of this reform
is to provide a high and stable level of effective demand in the global
economy. This will entail: (i) ensuring effective global coordination of
economic policies to eliminate 'beggar-my-neighbour' policies that lead
to global imbalances and restrict potential global growth; (ii) removing
the constant threat to global economic stability from volatile and
unregulated cross-border financial flows; and (iii) developing
coordinated macro-economic policies for dealing with future global
economic crises.
In short, this Report calls for countries to put in place the
necessary conditions for a dramatic shift in the current policy
approach. It highlights the need for an approach that recognizes the
importance of placing jobs at the top of the policy agenda and the need
for coherence among macroeconomic, employment and social policies. This
requires a significant change in domestic and global governance, which
is a complex task. Though the task is demanding, even progressive steps
in this direction will be rewarded with better job prospects and a more
efficient economy. |