Positive development against
separatism
SLFP
organiser for Batticaloa, Arun Thambimuttu's call for a new
brand of politics in the Northern and Eastern Provinces, which
would steer clear of ethnicity and separatism, is just what
moderate political opinion in Sri Lanka has been waiting to
hear. Indeed, it is high time this country said goodbye
permanently to the virulent and extremely divisive politics of
communalism and separatism.
Thambimuttu was emphatic that Sri Lanka rids itself of what
is called the 'communal card' in the politics it practises and
this point too must be pondered upon deeply by all
right-thinking sections in this country. In fact, he went on to
say that Sri Lanka must outlaw racism and other kindred species
of destructive politics and this position too must be well
received by the Lankan polity.
The impression that one receives is that the state would be
very accommodative of the opinions of the likes of Thambimuttu.
It would prefer to see emerging in the North and East, a
political leadership which would articulate the hopes and
aspirations of particularly the young in the provinces, who
gravitate, basically, towards the policy position that political
opinion in the North-East should integrate with the national
mainstream and cooperate with the state in bringing development
and prosperity to the once-conflict affected areas of the
country.
Arun Thambimuttu is one such progressive politician who has
shun the separatist slogans of the traditional political parties
of the North-East and is desirous of getting on with the task of
national advancement.
Accordingly, our hope is that there would be many more
politicians of Thambimuttu's ilk from the North-East who would
be willing to articulate a non-communal and non-separatist
standpoint and cooperate with the state in advancing the cause
of national development. In fact, as Defence Secretary Gotabhaya
Rajapaksa observed recently, the coalition in power should, in
the first instance, consider appointing to the National List
slots in Parliament, progressive, young politicians who would
help articulate the new hopes and aspirations of the North-East
and cooperate in realizing them. This is something which should
be pondered on deeply and acted upon.
In fact, if impartial fact-finding is conducted in the
formerly troubled areas it could be found that a substantial
section of opinion in the areas concerned is for turning a new
leaf in the affairs of the North-East.
They are by no means for continuing with the threadbare
separatist project of yesteryear. Thus, the possibilities are
great for beginning anew in the North-East and of providing
these provinces the opportunity of integrating strongly with the
rest of Sri Lanka and of remaining intact within the Lankan fold
forever more.
For its part, the Lankan state needs to aim at resolving the
issues confronting our communities, once and for all. For one
thing, there could be no quibbling on the LLRC report and on the
substantive issues flowing from it. True, the state could not
allow any quarter to hurry it on the report and its contents,
but there could be no foot-dragging on truly implementing the
more progressive and practicable measures recommended by the
report. The public needs to have the evidence of its eyes that
remedial measures to the outstanding issues faced by our
communities are being implemented by the state.
The state also needs to consider the implementation of
substantial confidence-building measures. We cannot see, for
instance, any harm deriving from the imposition of a prohibition
on communal politics. 'The communal card' was played both
gleefully and deftly by some politicians of both the South and
the North-East. This tactic amounted to rousing communal
passions among the people for petty gain. The accumulated
virulence of this tactic resulted in the ethnic holocaust of
July 1983. For 30 long years since then, Sri Lanka buckled under
a bloody conflict which left it emaciated and weak.
Therefore, we hardly need to stress the point that we need to
see an end to the 'communal card'. National peace and
reconciliation demands that we see an end to ethnicity and its
cataclysmic consequences. |