Standing by the people
Come what may, the
people's legitimate interests would take priority. This is the
message the government is keen on conveying and the public is
bound to find this very gratifying. This is a restatement of the
purpose of governance as conceptualized by the best of political
philosophers from time immemorial and we could not concur more
with the state on these sentiments. Righteous rule is indeed the
reason for the state's existence.
The recent resolution moved at the UNHRC sessions in Geneva
by the US against this country on what are described as
accountability issues, gives these pronouncements by the
government a special poignancy. There is no need to hit the
panic button over this development because, as External Affairs
Minister Prof. G. L. Peiris explained, such resolutions are
non-binding in nature and would not result in any crippling
consequences for Sri Lanka. Moreover, the state is on record
that it would not be surrendering to any pressure from whatever
quarter. The best interests of the country would never be
compromised, we are promised.
The public could also be glad that the government has made it
clear that no referenda would be held on the implementation of
the LLRC recommendations. This is needless speculation and could
be construed as an attempt to dramatize some current contentious
issues. The state is on record that the practicable
recommendations of the LLRC would be implemented and the matter
ends there.
The state would need to guard against any divisive and
emotional pronouncements being expressed on these issues by
persons in authority because rationality should be the
predominant frame of mind among the public. Persons speaking out
of turn could have unsettling and even dire consequences for the
country.
One huge positive that the country has acquired over the past
couple of months which must be preserved and consolidated in the
days ahead is communal unity and solidarity. We are witness to
how the country's people came together as one to decry the
threats to this country's sovereignty at the height of the
anti-Sri Lanka resolution drama. As never seen before, the
numerous communities and religions of this land stood
shoulder-to-shoulder to protect the country's good name and
integrity. This huge plus should never be allowed to be
undermined.
The enemies of this land are the remnants of the LTTE and
their supporters. These elements should not be confused with
this or that community.
Accordingly, communal amity needs to be preserved and
communal friction and animosities shown the door by all quarters
who are seeking to consolidate this country's legitimate
interests. Therefore, public emotions need to be handled with
the utmost judiciousness and insightfulness. Let us be a shining
example of a united and fraternal country. This is our ardent
wish for Sri Lanka.
Meanwhile, we wonder what became of the ruling party's plans
to obtain a list of those SLFP politicians and public office
bearers who have been accused of lawlessness. This was a step in
the correct direction and we could be certain that the move to
act against these criminal elements would have received the
applause of the public. However, the people are bound expect
concrete remedial action on the crime-containment front in view
of the fact that crime has emerged as a cause for profound
concern.
The state should also continue with top speed with its
programmes, such as, Divi Neguma, Uthuru Wasanthaya and
Negenahira Navodaya, which have obvious implications for the
people's well being.
It is such projects that impact closely on the people's
earning capacity and every effort must be made to ensure their
success. Rumblings about living costs are quite widespread, but
if the public's material hardships could be progressively
alleviated, the citizenry would have more money at hand.
Concurrently, entrepreneurship at the grassroots level should
be continuously fostered. Besides ensuring the people's well
being to a degree, such efforts would help in reducing youth
unemployment, which the state would do well to consider a major
concern. The state would need to be proactive, thus, on a number
of fronts. |