Geneva: the great lacuna in wisdom and compassion:
HR physicians must heal themselves of hypocrisy
The
forces ranged against Sri Lanka have had their day. It is now up to us
to have our way. The long exercise in battering Sri Lanka in Geneva is
over. Those who carried the day will have their moment of triumph. But
their success is evanescent. If reconciliation in Sri Lanka is the
catchword, rather than the theme of their actions, they may well find
that what they have done is to make the process harder for Sri Lanka.
These pyrrhic victors have not only pushed back the process of
reconciliation on which great hope remains in the country.
As Minister Mahinda Samarasinghe, the President's Special Envoy on
Human Rights and the leader of the Sri Lankan delegation to the UNHRC in
Geneva stated so aptly in his concluding statement: "This resolution if
adopted will not add value to the implementation process in Sri Lanka;
on the contrary, it may well be counter-productive and, as such, those
who have been using extreme pressure tactics in garnering support for
this ill-timed and unwarranted initiative should be mindful of the
responsibility that accompanies it."
Stability and peace
Minister Mahinda Samarasinghe
|
Yet these are not people or forces that are mindful of any such
responsibilities. From the outset of the campaign against Sri Lanka they
have been mouthing shibboleths about Human Rights and Humanitarian Law
and Values. Every one of those who were active in promoting this
resolution have with them a huge burden of violations of these very same
values. It is the same in that other cheap slogan of accountability that
those from Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton have been targeting Sri
Lanka with.
That is why Minister Samarasinghe had remind the UNHRC that despite
Sri Lanka's exemplary record of interaction with the Council, "Sri Lanka
has been selectively targeted by certain countries at the behest of some
who, we believe, still bear resentment at the clear and decisive
decision taken at the Special Session in 2009. This attempt to undermine
the Resolution of 2009 is unacceptable especially because of the
continuing improvement in Sri Lanka during the intervening period. A
resolution that dwells on the past will impose on this Council the
character of an adjudicatory body, with no limitation as to its
competence to reopen and revisit matters of the past, which could have
consequences affecting many others. Those who live in glass houses,
Madam President, are best advised to exercise caution before throwing
stones.
"After 30 long years of instability and violence, we have achieved
stability and peace. We need to be given time to further consolidate the
clear progress that has been achieved in a short period of three years.
"It is against this backdrop that my country is compelled to face a
misconceived, unwarranted and ill-timed draft resolution, which embodies
several harmful elements that clearly violate important principles that
will have adverse ramifications, not only for my country, but many other
countries.
This is why, Madam President, we took a decision, on a matter of
principle, that we will not accept such a Resolution, in an endeavor to
also ensure that a bad precedent is not established by this Council," he
said with compelling eloquence.
International law
There were important words of caution too in Sri Lanka's final
assessment of what was taking place in Geneva, at the behest of forces
that have never been interested in the genuine promotion of Human
Rights, but the use of this slogan for political or tactical gain. The
words of caution were that: "The way in which we will deal with this
matter today will decide whether or not purely parochial, if not
political, agendas far removed from the promotion and protection of
human rights, will be permitted to prevail."
People protesting against the US backed anti-Sri Lanka
resolution in Geneva. Picture by Nissanka Wijeratne |
In having our say, as we begin to make our way in the aftermath of
this hypocrisy and duplicity on Human Rights and international law, it
was necessary for the leader of the Sri Lankan delegation to state that:
"When we look at this draft resolution, it is clear that the founding
principles of the Human Rights Council which are anchored in
universality, impartiality, cooperation, non-selectivity and
objectivity, are being assailed. If we are true to our consciences, it
is not difficult to concede that the situation in Sri Lanka does not
warrant the attention and criticism in this Resolution. We are clearly
justified in asserting that we require time to realize comprehensive
reconciliation.
"This Resolution also runs counter to the principle of international
law that domestic remedies must be exhausted and should be the first
resort, prior to superimposing external mechanisms. In respect of Sri
Lanka's situation, it is barely three months since the presentation of
the domestic mechanism's report. Is it fair for this Council to
pre-judge our commitment to all aspects of the domestic process at this
juncture? Shouldn't we be given the time and space to continue this
process of implementation and of reconciliation without undue
interference?
Justice and respect
"If this proposed intrusion is accepted by this Council, no domestic
process would be free to deliver on its mandate unimpeded. Instead, a
superimposition of an external mechanism would become the order of the
day. I ask the question: Madam President, would all delegations in this
Council subscribe to such abdication of sovereign responsibility and
permit a usurpation of an independent nation's prerogative to act in its
people's paramount interests?"
These are indeed question of paramount importance to all countries as
the interest in genuine Human Rights rather than the excuse for it that
is promoted by the United States and its old and new allies today. The
use of the UNHRC to make a mockery of these cherished principles of
Human Rights and International Law can soon come to haunt many other
countries, both near and afar. There will be other 'Diaspora' emerging
in the not too distant future, who will also demand and gain the
attention of these preachers of 'Western' democracy and questionable
'accountability'.
The concluding remarks by Minister Samarasinghe were reassuring in
its commitment that the government of Sri Lanka will spare no effort to
safeguard the sovereignty and independence of the motherland. As we
defeated terrorism through resolute and united action, we will dedicate
our efforts to guaranteeing equality, dignity, justice and respect of
each and every Sri Lankan, who have reposed their trust in our vision
for the future. May I add, Madam President that no one has to remind us
of this responsibility.
Similarly, he was ready to expose the pretense of the resolution's
proponents and the dangers their attitude poses to Asia's oldest
democracy, when he said: "We have defeated one of the most ruthless
terrorist outfits after 30 years of conflict to free our people.
Ironically, proponents and sponsors of this resolution are among those
who have proscribed the LTTE and who now seek to give comfort to the
proxies of the organization. The impact would be to encourage them to
resume their activity under the protective umbrella of these countries
and also to undermine a long-standing, well established democracy such
as Sri Lanka.
"Finally, Madam President, the resolution before this Council for
consideration is not acceptable to Sri Lanka as the country concerned.
To the sponsor and co-sponsors of this resolution, I say: "Physician,
heal thyself".
Protests and demonstrations
It was a strong reminder of what ails those who were so active in
promoting this resolution. Deeply afflicted by insincerity and
duplicity, and being so paranoid in their readiness to please the agents
of terror, who have not had the least regard for democracy or the right
to life of Sri Lankans from all walks of life; they suffer from the
arrogance of being part of a self-proclaimed international community.
They are tasked with healing themselves, before they seek to mend the
ways of those who come from a society that has a rich tradition of
humanitarian values, and a culture of tolerance and understanding,
unlike the 'Diaspora' of terror they champion today.
The protests and demonstrations we saw throughout the country and
abroad as the duplicity at Geneva kept dragging on, produced many a good
slogan. One that caught my mind said "War of Terror: We have won, they
are on the run". But what struck me most was at the Satyagraha near the
Fort Railway Station that said "Obamaata pragnava saha karunava
pahalaveva" which means "May Obama acquire wisdom and compassion".
As the voting in Geneva showed there are many more than him to whom
this applies, including those who are affected by 'coalition compulsion'
in the face of regional racism and humiliating electoral defeat, with
more promise of such defeats. |