Steady implementation of LLRC recommendations - Part
II:
Massive development in the North
Statement by Mahinda Samarasinghe, MP, Minister of Plantation
Industries and Special Envoy of the President on Human Rights, leader of
the Sri Lanka delegation to the 19th Session of the United Nations Human
Rights Council High Level Segment on February 27 in Geneva
The civil service in the North and the East is largely representative
of the Tamil and Muslim communities.
Chief Secretary/Northern Province and three out of the five District
Secretaries/Government Agents in the North, i.e., in Jaffna, Vavuniya
and Kilinochi, are Tamil women civil servants, while the other two are
Tamil males. The Chief Secretary of the Eastern Province is also from
the Tamil community. It may be noted that the present District
Secretary/Government Agent of Jaffna District served in the same
capacity in the Mullaitivu district when it was under the LTTE's
control.
|
Minister
Mahinda Samarasinghe |
Allied with this is the sometimes contentious issue of language. Sri
Lanka has an official languages policy in place which gives equal place
to the Sinhala and Tamil languages, mandated by the constitution. The
right of all persons to function and communicate in a language of their
choice is constitutionally entrenched.
The Trilingual Policy, announced by the government in January 2012,
will further consolidate the implementation of the Official Languages
policy and make a valuable contribution to building bridges between the
communities and strengthening national unity.
This is a key component of the reconciliation process and language
was an important focus of the LLRC's recommendations. More than 1,600
Tamil speaking police officers have been recruited already, and the
Tamil language capability of public servants and the police will be
further enhanced in the future.
Internally Displaced Persons
It is a matter of great satisfaction to the government that our rapid
and orderly process of resettlement of Internally Displaced Persons
(IDPs) has been recognized and commended internationally. Out of over
290,000 IDPs housed in welfare centres at the end of May 2009, only
6,647 IDPs remained to be resettled by the end of 2011. The government
has spent over USD 360 million on its resettlement programme.
We will continue with our commitment to resettling all IDPs,
including those termed ‘old IDPs’ who were displaced prior to April
2008. The United Nations OCHA Joint Humanitarian and Early Recovery
Update for November and December 2011, records that by the end of
December 2011, 421,056 people (belonging to 126,524 families) had
returned to the Northern Province. This figure includes 223,745 people
(70,625 families) displaced after April 2008 and 197,311 persons (55,899
families) displaced before April 2008. Further efforts to identify and
assist IDPs in situations of protracted displacement to achieve durable
solutions are ongoing.
LTTE ex-combatants
The de-mining of former conflict-affected areas was carried out at a
pace comparable with the best achievements in the world. The government
has at present demined 1,412 square kilometres out of the 2,046 square
kilometres that were contaminated with landmines. More than 42,000
Antipersonnel Mines and 227 Antitank Mines, and more than 15,000 items
of Unexploded Ordnance have been recovered from these areas.
The Sri Lanka Army is responsible for around 80 percent of the
successful demining operations and is supported by other agencies. It
may be noted that with the establishment of the National Mine Action
Centre under the Ministry of Economic Development in 2010, all
coordination related to mine action and mine risk education come under
the purview of civil administration.
With regard to rehabilitation of LTTE ex-combatants, out of nearly
12,000, less than 900 remain in rehabilitation centres. Psycho-social
care has been provided to all, including counselling and drama, dance
and music therapy. Spiritual and religious programmes have also been
conducted. Adult cadres have been provided with extensive vocational
training making them employable and potentially useful members of their
communities. Those ex-combatants still to complete the process of
rehabilitation remain in the Protective Accommodation and Rehabilitation
Centres (PARC) established by law. The 595 LTTE child soldiers who were
in government custody have been rehabilitated under a UNICEF-assisted
programme without setting in motion any criminal procedure, and returned
to their families within one year. Several have successfully passed
their Advanced Level examination last year, some having even gained
entry to undergraduate programmes.
In accordance with established practice of post-conflict
decommissioning, the government has institutionalized a process with
legislative oversight, to continuously record specific details on the
number of weapons recovered, in order to bring about an end to the
possession of unauthorized weapons. This will have important
implications for human security in general and positively impact on the
law and order situation as well.
Foreign investors
Economic development continues to play a pivotal role in the
reconciliation process and the return to normalcy. Massive
infrastructure and development programmes are underway in the former
conflict-affected areas of the Northern and Eastern Provinces. The
government has embarked upon 27 donor assisted projects of which 23 are
implemented in the North and the East to develop infrastructure
including housing, roads, bridges, schools, hospitals and irrigation
schemes, valued at approximately USD 201 million for the year 2011
alone. Of the above projects, seven are categorized as large projects,
each valued at above USD 50 million per project. The total allocation
for infrastructure development in the Jaffna district in the Northern
Province is USD 300 million, while USD 250 million and USD 150 million
have been invested in development projects in the Killinochchi and
Batticaloa districts, respectively.
Since the end of the conflict, a 22 percent economic growth has been
recorded in the Northern Province, while Sri Lanka's overall GDP
recorded around 8 percent growth in 2011. In terms of investment
promotion, the Atchchuveli Industrial Zone, which is being developed in
a 25 acre land area is expected to attract approximately 40 local and
foreign investors and to generate employment to over 6,000 persons. A
further 67 acres is scheduled to be added in the second stage. The
Palaly airport - which is to be upgraded, and the Kankesanthurai (KKS)
harbour - are located less than 10 kilometres from the Industrial Zone,
thus providing additional logistical advantages to investors. The Zone
will enable small and medium enterprises to better tap into the
post-conflict opportunities in the country.
Parliamentary Select Committee
The reconstruction of the Northern railway line which was totally
destroyed by the LTTE, is currently under way. Both initiatives are
supported by assistance from the government of India. The rail link from
Omanthai to Pallai and on to KKS, will provide connectivity and linkage
to markets to the Northern province.
A Vocational Training Institute on par with international standards
and certification that is being set up in Kilinochchi under the purview
of the Ministry of Youth Affairs and Skills Development with assistance
from Germany, will enhance the skill levels and the employment
opportunities of the youth in the Northern province. We acknowledge with
appreciation the assistance that has been received from several other
countries.
The peace we have won at such cost to the nation and its people will
not be a genuine peace until and unless the legitimate aspirations of
all communities are met in a substantive and satisfactory manner. The
consensus formula to the national question thus evolved, needs to be
democratic, pragmatic and home-grown, in order to be sustainable. As a
central feature of the government's approach to evolving such a process,
a Parliamentary Select Committee (PSC) is contemplated to achieve
multi-party consensus in respect of constitutional changes, to fulfil
the legitimate aspirations of the Sri Lankan people enabling them to
work in unison and with a sense of national identity for a better
tomorrow.
Parallel with this multi-party mechanism, the government has
commenced bilateral discussions with Tamil political parties as well as
Muslim representation. The government has already nominated its members
to the PSC and is awaiting the nomination of members representing the
Opposition, after which its sittings can commence.
We are mindful that all previous attempts at evolving a
constitutional formula have failed due to lack of consensus. We are
optimistic that the Parliamentary Select Committee process would help
achieve such a consensus, given its inclusivity and transparency and
commitment to democratic ideals.
With regard to Sri Lanka's international commitments to safeguard and
promote human rights, it may be noted that it has voluntarily engaged
with UN mechanisms including special procedures and treaty bodies. In
this regard, Sri Lanka constructively engaged in the consideration of
the third and fourth Combined Periodic Reports on Sri Lanka to the
Committee Against Torture in December 2011. Sri Lanka will also engage
with the Working Group on Enforced and Involuntary Disappearances at its
96th Session in Geneva in March 2012. Sri Lanka's National Report will
be considered in October 2012 during the second cycle of the Universal
Periodic Review, which will provide an opportunity to comprehensively
discuss the progress made over a four-year period, as well as issues
related to reconciliation. Our efforts are directed towards engagement
at this next cycle of the UPR. Any and all questions pertaining to
developments after 2008 may be raised there and will be fully and fairly
answered.
International community
We have also continued to engage in Geneva and at other international
fora and briefed the international community about our progress,
problems and solutions that we have devised. We have hosted several high
profile officials from several countries to visit Sri Lanka to view the
reconstruction work. We continue to engage the international community
by inviting them to witness first-hand the progress being made on the
ground.
Domestically, very specific measures have been adopted by the
government to safeguard human rights. It may be recalled that during Sri
Lanka's last engagement with the UPR process in 2008, it pledged to
devise a five-year National Action Plan for the Promotion and Protection
of Human Rights. We have worked hard on delivering on that pledge
through a participatory process involving government and civil society.
The result is the National Action Plan for the Promotion and Protection
of Human Rights which was approved by the Cabinet of Ministers in
September 2011.
We are now at the implementation stage of the Action Plan, including
monitoring and evaluation. The Action Plan presents a structured
framework to monitor the implementation of existing laws, policies and
practices and to enhance a better understanding and respect of human
rights. It addresses eight areas, viz, civil and political rights,
economic, social, and cultural rights, children's rights, labour rights,
migrant worker rights, prevention of torture, women's rights and the
rights of IDPs. We have completed the very first activity identified in
the Plan which is the appointment of a sub-Committee of the Cabinet that
will oversee its implementation. At the operational level, I will Chair
a body of senior officials of institutions that will be charged with
implementation.
OHCHR budget
Sri Lanka is firmly committed to strengthening the international
human rights system. We are appreciative of the important work being
carried out by the treaty bodies for the promotion and protection of
human rights. We welcome the initiatives undertaken to strengthen the
treaty body system, given the current challenges faced in terms of
resources and the increase in their work load. We are however firmly of
the view that such should be achieved through an intergovernmental
process, which is both transparent and inclusive, and based on a legal
mandate. We are also of the view that greater synergy and harmonisation
between, and not just within treaty bodies, but also with other human
rights mechanisms such as the UPR and special procedures, is necessary
to yield optimum results and to minimise duplication.
Similarly, Sri Lanka is deeply concerned to observe the continuing
imbalance between the assessed and voluntary contributions to the OHCHR
budget. We are of the view that voluntary contributions should be
subject to the same level of intergovernmental scrutiny and oversight as
the regular budget. We continue to support initiatives in this regard in
the Sixth Committee as well as through constructive engagement with the
OHCHR, with a view to ensuring that the principles of accountability and
transparency are institutionally entrenched in the work of the
Organization.
External challenges
In light of Sri Lanka's demonstrated commitment to an internal
reconciliation process, including the implementation of the range of
recommendations of the LLRC by the adoption of a road map for
implementation as I outlined earlier, its continued engagement with the
Member States of the Council and its participation in dialogue with
treaty bodies and through modalities such as the UPR, the persistent
request for engagement within the formal processes of the Council by
some states can only be viewed with misgivings. We are of the view that
this could be perceived as undue interference with internal processes of
recovery and reconciliation containing strong elements of prejudgment
and the application of double standards. Given our bona fide actions on
the domestic and international plane, this action would not be in
keeping with established international procedure, where domestic
processes must be exhausted before resorting to review before external
fora.
We must keep in mind that one of the major external challenges that
Sri Lanka is faced with in the post-conflict context, is that the
remainder of the terrorist organization identified as the world's most
ruthless, is proscribed by 32 countries including the US, Canada and
Member States of the EU, are still active in some countries and are
engaged in clandestine activities, including fund raising, money
laundering, drug trafficking and human smuggling. They also wield
considerable electoral and political influence in their host countries
due to the concentration of large numbers in key population centres.
They continue to advocate mono-ethnic separatism in Sri Lanka, while
espousing a separatist ideology of the terrorist group, using the
latter's resources and being manipulated by its surviving leadership.
They also resort to exploiting the electoral influence of the expatriate
Sri Lankan Tamil community living in these countries. It is unfortunate
that this group of the defeated terrorists, by attempting to pursue
punitive action at the Human Rights Council through some of their host
governments, should actually be resorting to undermining the genuine
reconciliation process underway in Sri Lanka.
Domestic process
We categorically reject such undue pressure from sections of the
international community which have fallen prey to the propaganda,
coercive tactics and electoral pressures of these elements. We are
conscious of their need to portray a negative picture of Sri Lanka and
unreasoning pessimism in order to justify their continued presence in
these host countries. Instead of accepting our President's invitation to
become constructive partners in development and building a renewed Sri
Lanka, it is most regrettable that these elements devote their time,
effort and resources in defaming their motherland and denigrating the
genuine efforts of the government to consolidate peace, development and
prosperity for all Sri Lankans.
We as a government, therefore, question the value addition of
internationalizing through seeking to deliberate upon an effective
ongoing domestic process in international fora. Such endeavours would
only serve to detract from an expeditious resolution of the issues at
hand. We also wish to emphasise that action initiated in the promotion
and protection of human rights in a member state, must have the consent
of that state and be based on the principles of cooperation and genuine
dialogue. We have good examples today of instances where this cardinal
principle has been violated, and where even the application of a
multiplication of special initiatives has nevertheless failed to
establish peace, and has only contributed to exacerbating and at times
externalising conflict situations.
Separatist terrorism
It should be apparent, therefore, that Sri Lanka is best placed to
successfully conclude a home-grown process of reconciliation acceptable
to, and benefitting all of its people.
It is most pertinent to state that any home grown process would take
into account the culture, the values, traditions, customs and history of
its people. Therefore, it is of critical importance that Sri Lanka be
provided with the time and space required to continue with its genuine
national endeavours towards achieving this objective. We therefore urge
the Council to be guided by the principles in the UNGA Resolution
60/251, and reiterate the importance of ensuring adherence to cardinal
postulates of universality, objectivity and non-selectivity in the
consideration of issues in the promotion and protection of human rights.
It is our sincere hope that all those who wish Sri Lanka well, would
view progress made so far as a catalyst, and continue to engage with us
in a constructive spirit. The people of Sri Lanka expect and deserve no
less.
In conclusion, I must point out that Sri Lanka rooted out and
destroyed domestic manifestations of separatist terrorism largely on its
own with the assistance of a notable few international partners. Those
who did assist - materially and otherwise - know that their contribution
to eradicating this 30 year conflict, is acknowledged with deep and
abiding gratitude. Similarly, our Asian regional partners among others
are contributing to the massive recovery process in the aftermath of the
conflict. They too are acknowledged with sincere appreciation. However,
it is regrettable that some of those members of the international
community that are among the shrillest and loudest voices in support of
various causes in post-conflict Sri Lanka - who raise a clamour over
civilian welfare, women's rights, displaced persons, children,
minorities and a host of other issues - are among the least forthcoming
in term of real assistance to the recovery effort.
The government of Sri Lanka, the United Nations and international and
national NGOs entered into a tripartite agreement that represents a
coordinated and cooperative initiative aimed at recovering from the
armed conflict and safeguarding the human rights of those affected. It
is named the Joint Assistance Plan for the Northern Province which, at
the end of 2011, had only received approximately a meagre 35 percent of
the required funding for that year. One hopes that these nations, given
their ostensibly deep and abiding interest evinced in protecting human
rights in Sri Lanka, would find it able to assist the civilian
population especially in the conflict affected areas.
Delivering homilies about human rights in Sri Lanka at fora such as
these would be much more meaningful if they were supported by real and
substantial cooperation and assistance in keeping with this Council's
Resolution on Sri Lanka in 2009. Enabling a member state to overcome the
undoubted challenges it faces in reconciliation and restoration of
normality and productive civilian life - particularly amongst those
worst affected by the scourge of terrorism - would be much more tangible
and helpful to all concerned, rather than the mere repetition of
unsubstantiated allegations and unconscionable finger-pointing directed
at Sri Lanka.
As ever, my delegation and I, assure you of our fullest cooperation
in conducting the work of these sessions.
Thank you.
Concluded
|