Notable foreign policy triumph
Two heavyweights in global affairs, Australia and
India, have clearly and emphatically confirmed that the next
Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM) will be held in
Sri Lanka in 2013, as already decided, and that this decision
will stand. This is clear proof that Sri Lanka is commanding the
respect of important sections of the international community and
that the baseless criticisms leveled against it in some quarters
are failing to carry any weight. In other words, a substantial
proportion of world opinion is with Sri Lanka, despite the
anti-Sri Lanka mill working overnight.
One of the most important messages these developments convey
is that Sri Lanka's foreign policy, in its thinking and
implementation, is proving highly successful currently. A
considerable proportion of the credit for this success, we
believe, should accrue to President Mahinda Rajapaksa and
External Affairs Minister Prof. G.L. Peiris, who have been
sparing no pains over the past few months to enlighten world
opinion on the issues at present confronting Sri Lanka. They
have underscored, in no uncertain terms, the insubstantial
nature of the anti-Lanka propaganda currently being spewed by
the LTTE rump and its supporters. For these purposes, the
President and his External Affairs Minister have gone more than
the extra mile and we believe their efforts must be appreciated.
Along with this development, we have had the Indian Foreign
Secretary Ranjan Mathai going on record that his country would
be opposing the proposal of introducing what has been referred
to as a Human Rights and Rule of Law monitor for the
Commonwealth countries. The Foreign Secretary quite rightly
pointed out that what should be uppermost in the minds of the
Commonwealth is development, since this is the preoccupation of
the vast majority of the people of the world. In fact, there
could be no trade-off between development and rights.
Development enhances rights of the people and vice versa. But
there could be no lopsided emphasis on rights at the expense of
development. Focusing disproportionately on rights, is a Western
tendency that would run counter to the general interests of the
majority of the people in the developing world, for whom
material advancement is of prime importance. Accordingly, it is
in the fitness of things that India should remind the West about
these home truths.
But there is no room for complacency on these and related
issues. The hard work expended in moulding international opinion
in our favour has to continue and very vibrantly. The vast
majority of developing countries, some of which are in the
Commonwealth fold, see eye-to-eye with us on national
priorities. One of the latter is uninterrupted development and
we need to persist on this path consistently and collectively.
Therefore, bridges that exist between us and the rest of the
developing world need to be strengthened and if new bridges need
to be built, this task too must be attended to with the greatest
urgency. In fact, the time has come for stepped-up co-operation
among Third World countries because it is plain to see that
sections of the developed countries are persisting on a foreign
policy path which is at cross purposes with that of the
developing countries. The need of the hour is equitable
development and a world economic order which would facilitate
this, but this is not the point of view of the foremost Western
powers.
So, we need to have a greater in-gathering of minds among the
developing countries. Ideally, Third World organizations, such
as the Non-aligned Movement, must be rejuvenated and rendered
vibrant. The developing countries must work collectively and
hard towards furthering their legitimate interests and this must
be prime on the foreign policy agendas of Third World countries.
If countries such as Sri Lanka are being compelled to face
thorny foreign policy issues, it is because the developing
countries are not bringing together their collective power to
counter-balance the might of the First World. Therefore, the
struggle by the developing countries to redress the power
imbalance between the First and Third Worlds must continue.
|