Anti-terror measures and
pluralism
The recent bomb blast at the New Delhi High Court
which claimed the lives of nearly a dozen persons and wounded
scores of others, is an unsettling reminder that terror is
forever on the prowl in this region and outside and needs to be
fought tooth and nail. The continuing bloodshed perpetrated by
extremists of all kinds everywhere in the world, adds a special
poignancy to recollections of the 9/11 tragedy and other bloody
cataclysms of the kind which have seared the moral conscience of
humanity over the years.
Needless to say, our hearts are with India over this latest
extremist-inspired atrocity and there is no doubt that President
Mahinda Rajapaksa and the Lankan state would go more than the
extra mile to be of assistance to India in this painful moment.
India could count on Sri Lanka to be fully empathetic towards
her because Sri Lanka herself is no stranger to extremist
terror. Needless to say, Sri Lanka endured political terrorism
of the worst kind at the hands of the ruthless LTTE, for over 30
long years, which was, of course, finally defeated by our
Security Forces under the leadership of President Rajapaksa on
May 19, 2009.
In fact, all those countries which are experiencing the
horrors of political extremism could depend on Sri Lanka to only
empathize with them but to readily share with them the most
invaluable terror-fighting military know how and techniques
which she accumulated over the years. Terror has to be fought
collectively and in this task a sharing of knowledge and
expertise is essential.
The terror in New Delhi should remind the world community
that no quarter could be given to the practitioners of terror
anywhere. Nor could those countries which have suffered
grievously at the hands of terrorists be treated
inconsiderately. The latter we need to say because Sri Lanka is
being needlessly persecuted by some sections of the world
community over allegations relating to the final stages of the
humanitarian operation, whereas she should be admired and
considered a role model by all those who are unfortunate enough
to suffer at the hands of terrorists.
Sri Lanka had no choice but to defend herself against a
ruthless terror outfit which was all out to dismember her, but
instead of winning the backing of the world, Sri Lanka is now
being called on to answer unfounded charges in some 'councils of
the world'. This is the reason why the upcoming sessions of the
UNHRC would need to be watched closely. This could be a
facetious situation where attempts are being made to penalize a
country over its inalienable right to defend its territorial
integrity and sovereignty.
Meanwhile, the tenets of International Law are being violated
with impunity by some powerful states of the world system under
the guise of fighting terror. Civilians are dying in these
efforts to quell terror but no accountability procedures seem to
be taking effect. Thus is double-speak and double-think being
made to rule the world.
However, the truth is that terror is continuing to stalk the
world and states cannot stand idly by when this happens. All the
necessary law and order measures need to be used to fight the
wasting blight. Here, in South Asia, such efforts must be
conducted on a collective basis and SAARC would need to expedite
such joint efforts to fight a common enemy which spares none, on
a most urgent basis. It is of the utmost importance that SAARC
amity is firmly established before the fight is taken back to
terror collectively. A divided house would only weaken and
render ineffective these joint efforts.
But law and order measures are only part of the answer to
terror. It is also important that extremist political opinion is
defeated simultaneously through knowledgeable popular discourse
and theoretical inputs that expose the fallaciousness of hard
line, narrow political perceptions. These tasks must be
undertaken by the more enlightened sections of the mass media,
the intellectual and academic communities of this region and
those in the world outside.
What needs to be popularized worldwide is democratic
discourse or opinion which envisages tolerance, humanity and
accommodation of the 'Other'. It is in a world characterized by
'unity in diversity', at every conceivable level, that the death
knell of extremism and terror could finally be sounded. |