It’s all about who is your kind of tyrant and who is not
Perhaps it is some intrinsic political tendency, genetic if you like,
of the human condition, but we consistently interpret events in ways
that justify our preferences or buttress our beliefs. I am thinking of
course about the recent developments (perhaps ‘development’ is too
positive a term?) in Libya.
This is supposed to be the tail-end of the so-called Arab Spring.
Those who coined the term (sections of the media that is slavishly
pro-Washington) and those who orchestrated the whole operation (and
let’s not kid ourselves that it was spontaneous citizens’ uprisings and
nothing else!) quite happily conflate categories, use universalistic
language and treat not just countries but entire continents as
geographical and social monoliths. We’ve seen crass generalizations
regarding the countries and the uprisings.
Popular uprising
First of all, each country is unique and is uniquely constituted by
class structures and other social layers. They have different histories
and have different structures of governance. The people enjoy or suffer
different benefits and deprivations respectively and live under
different kinds of systems. There are similarities, yes, but the
distinctions override.
|
Libyan
rebels. Picture courtesy: Google |
The Washington-loving media speak of Egypt and Libya in the same
breath. That’s not just shoddy journalism but indicate appalling levels
of submission to the Washington View of the Word (WVW). The disparities,
corruption, dictatorial realities and assets of the two countries are
starkly different. Different too is the methodologies used by Washington
to down regimes.
In Egypt a relatively more popular uprising was managed in ways that
a regime was installed that could do what Mubarak had done for years. So
it was a matter of an unpopular but friendly tyrant whose use-by date
had passed being nudged out and replaced by a regime that was as
friendly to the USA. In Libya, the USA and others of the Evil Axis,
namely Britain and France, wrangled a UN Security Council Resolution to
justify what was made out to be limited military operations ‘to prevent
civilians being harmed’.
The ‘civilians’ turned out to be nothing more than a bunch of
brigands funded and armed by Washington. The Air Force of the USA and
those of Britain and France have carried out over 7,000 bombing attacks
since March 19, 2011. They’ve sent special operation ground forces and
commando units to direct the military operations of the so-called
‘rebels’. It is, as Brian Becker, National Coordinator of ANSWER
Coalition (‘The truth about the situation in Libya’) puts it, ‘a
NATO-led army in the field’.
Libyan air space
Dissatisfaction with the Libyan leadership is no doubt a part of the
story, but impoverishment was not. Libya, post-1969 not only cleared the
nation of all foreign military presence, but put in place processes that
resulted in a remarkable improvement in living standards. The most
pertinent fact is that Libyans are certainly not in charge of
script-writing the rebellion nor will they be masters of the outcome.
It’s now months since anyone spoke of the Security Council resolution
regarding the use and abuse of Libyan air space. The protectors quickly
became predators, perpetrating the crimes they set out to prevent.
It’s all about oil. Libya has the largest oil reserves in all of
Africa and moreover her oil is particularly coveted due to its superior
quality. As Becker points out, if it was about democracy and
civilization, then NATO had better start bombing Saudi Arabia right
away. In fact NATO should have launched an attack against that country
decades ago!
But Saudi Arabia will not be made a Libya. Ronald Reagan insisted
that the despotic, tyrannical monarchy will be protected against
insurrection. Barack Obama, for all his liberalist and outwardly
enlightened rhetoric is proving to be a not-so-closeted Reaganite. The
same goes for Bahrain, where the regime has unleashed and continues to
unleash violence on an agitating population that makes Gaddafi’s
operations against ‘rebels’ in Libya seems like a water-pistol fight
between schoolboy gangs. But Bahrain will not be censured. The people
will not be armed. NATO will not drop arms nor send commandos to direct
field operations.
NATO
The reason is not hard to fathom. It’s about who is ‘My Kind of
Tyrant’ and who is not, as far as Washington is concerned. There are
tyrannies, ladies and gentlemen, that will be suffered and celebrated
and there are democracies that will be censured. It’s about friendship.
Did I hear someone mutter ‘integrity’ in a questioning tone? No, that
cannot be and anyway it can’t be about Barack Obama or the liars and
brutes in NATO who are on his friends’ list. It’s all very simple. Libya
is not Egypt II or Tunisia II, this we know. Neither Bahrain nor Saudi
Arabia, meanwhile, will be permitted to be Libya II. Labouring the point
seems meaningless. There are other things to be done and I don’t have to
elaborate.
www.malindawords.blogspot.com
|