Lakshman Kadirgamar’s sixth death anniversary:
Worked for a united Sri Lanka
Tissa JAYATILAKA
Given the shrillness of the nature of public debate in recent times,
especially postwar, most Sri Lankans I know have avoided getting
involved in them. The latter have resorted to ‘quiet discussion’ with
fellow citizens who are not uncomfortable with points of view that are
not in harmony with their own and who indeed are looking for such
carefully articulated alternatives. The late Lakshman Kadirgamar was one
such Sri Lankan with whom I could trade ideas and opinions with utmost
ease even when they did not necessarily mesh with his own.
Lakshman Kadirgamar |
He had the emotional intelligence and the humility of the truly
educated human being to be open to such give and take at all times. In
an exchange similar to the ones I used to have with the late Foreign
Minister that I now have with a few very close friends, we happened to
discuss, among other issues, what Lakshman Kadirgamar would have done to
extricate Sri Lanka from the unfortunate predicament it is in had he yet
been with us today. I thought it might be useful to reflect and expand
on this particular theme as a tribute to the man whose sixth death
anniversary fell on August 12.
Cruel assassination
The greatest asset that Lakshman Kadirgamar possessed was his freedom
from narrow nationalism. He was thereby free of ethnic and religious
bias. He was a Sri Lankan and a citizen of this world. He did not carry
to an extreme the labels Tamil and Christian he was given at his birth
over which he, like all of us over our own labels, had no control. He
was a good and responsible Christian (I recall here in particular his
Revd. Celestine Fernando Memorial Lecture of the early 1990s on the
general theme of the Social Relevance of the Bible) and also a firm
follower of all that is good and meaningful in other religious
philosophies.
It is this largeness of heart and generosity of spirit which enabled
Lakshman Kadirgamar to be the most effective diplomat Sri Lanka has had
from 1994 until his cruel assassination in 2005. Apart from Mrs.
Sirimavo Bandaranaike (prior to the Republican Constitutions of 1972 and
1978, the Prime Minister of our country was also the Defence and
External Affairs Minister), no other Foreign Minister of Sri Lanka has
rendered such invaluable service to our country. His formidable
intelligence, sincerity, grace, charm and superb sense of humour, that
the visiting British Minister Liam Fox also recently extolled while
delivering the 2011 Lakshman Kadirgamar Memorial Lecture, enabled him to
establish a rapport with his counterparts both in our part of the world
and in the West. He was never out of his depth nor ever ineffectual as
nearly all of his successors have been and are in either part of the
world. Nobody doubted his credibility or his ability. He was bold,
candid and assertively forthright without ever seeking to score cheap
debating points or end up looking pathetically melodramatic as his less
experienced fellow- Sri Lankans have in recent years.
Even when he was in strong disagreement with his interlocutors he
never lost his composure or his wits, and both of these attributes were
on splendid display during his BBC Hardtalk interview of March 16, 2005.
His interviewer observed that the government of Sri Lanka has been
criticized by Chandru Pararjasingham of the Tamil Rehabilitation
Organization on the score of ‘not helping us (the Tamils of Sri Lanka)
enough’ and posed the question ‘does that sound like propaganda to you?’
Kadirgamar’s response was that it absolutely was propaganda.
The interviewer then, in a bid seemingly to reinforce the point she
was seeking to make, tried to quote what she thought was an
authoritative source and indicated to the Minister that no less a person
than Joel Charny of Refugee International who had been monitoring
developments in Sri Lanka since the tsunami of December 2004 hit Sri
Lanka also says the same thing.
Sinhala-Tamil conflic
The response from Kadirgamar was both swift and pointed. Having first
noted that he does not know who the gentleman is and on being told that
he is a Westerner, the minister shot back: ‘I am sorry, the fact that he
is Western doesn’t impress me the slightest’. There were no histrionics,
no melodrama and the response was in the dignified and famous ‘mellow
tones’ of Lakshman Kadirgamar. That is the sophistication and
effectiveness we glaringly lack today in dealing with criticism from
whichever quarter they emanate.
Today’s spokesmen seek to play to the domestic gallery and shoot the
messengers without taking on board their messages and forensically
dismissing them where such dismissal is justifiably called for. An area
where there is a great deal of ignorance about Lakshman Kadirgamar
pertains to his response to the Sinhala-Tamil conflict or the ‘national
conflict’ as some refer to it. His enlightened and principled opposition
to the Tamil Tigers was frequently misunderstood both by his Sinhala
admirers and his Tamil detractors. Unintelligent and ethnically
prejudiced Tamils saw him as a traitor and unsophisticated Sinhalese as
a supporter of Sinhala ‘majoritarianism’. Both were and are dead wrong.
Throughout his bold campaign for peace in our time in Sri Lanka, he
was convinced that human freedoms need not be repressed in the
peacemaking process. Whilst he was relentless in his criticism of the
terror tactics of the Tamil Tigers, Kadirgamar worked resolutely and
tirelessly towards a political solution to our long drawn out ethnic
imbroglio which would enable the Tamil citizens of Sri Lanka to live in
dignity within a united Sri Lanka.
Kadirgamar’s oft-stated belief was that the battle for peace must be
fought and won in and through the hearts and minds of the people of Sri
Lanka; the Tamils of Sri Lanka in particular. Towards this end,
Kadirgamar took a keen and personal interest in projects that were close
to the hearts of the more sensitive Sri Lankans. An example of such a
project that he involved himself in was the restoration of the Jaffna
Public Library.
He actively campaigned for donations of books and other materials for
the Library during his days as our Foreign Minister.
Channel4 videos
One of the key areas in which the late Lakshman Kadirgmar excelled
was ‘quiet diplomacy’. I make bold to say that had he yet been with us,
we would not have had to contend with the indignities that have been
heaped on us by the UN Secretary General’s Panel of Experts Report or
the exceedingly damaging Channel4 videos.
As Lakshman Kadirgamar did when he successfully campaigned for the
listing in the West of the Tamil Tigers as a terrorist outfit, he would
have so handled the foreign policy dimension of these grave accusations
as to save Sri Lanka from the moral opprobrium it has now been subjected
to.
Effective, timely and sensible diplomacy would certainly have made it
possible for Sri Lanka to avert such disastrous negative publicity.
Lakshman Kadirgamar and the senior professional diplomats in the
ministry he led with such aplomb and grace would certainly have provided
us with the expertise, maturity and competence called for to deal with
this dreadful damage to our country.
Lakshman Kadirgamar would also have read the tea leaves more
accurately than his successors appear to have done. The world is a far
more complex place today than it appears to be. Today’s friends can
easily become tomorrow’s enemies or neutral observers of the passing
scene. Political deals are possible at any time between seeming
antagonists as we have witnessed to be the case in recent months.
We know only too well that the practice of international relations is
no morality play. Self-interests govern inter-state relations, not
perceived friendships or enmities. Inter-state relations are amoral at
best and at worst mostly immoral. Double if not treble standards apply
in this domain as many a contributor to our national newspapers has
alleged.
To urge Sri Lanka to punch in its own weight class is not to
recommend national subservience to unscrupulous outside forces. Rather
it is to forewarn Sri Lanka to be cautious, prudent and pragmatic in its
international relations.
It is such pragmatism based on our enlightened pursuit of
Non-alignment in international affairs which stood us in such excellent
stead in the recent past. A serious consideration of a return to that
past might be in our national interest. There is a pithy Sinhala saying
which reminds us that when giant thoras and moras fight, small fish tend
to get in harm's way.
Isn't there a moral in this that we can draw?
I am of the opinion that Lakshman Kadirgamar would have helped us to
navigate these tricky, shark infested and polluted waters had he yet
been the undisputed helmsman of our international relations as he was in
his day. He would have forestalled post-war external interventions and
led Sri Lanka to an acceptable domestic resolution of our crisis by
working with our moderate middle.
He would undoubtedly have finessed at one and the same time the
dangerous external challenge arising from the extreme diasporic Tamils
and that emerging from the ultra-nationalist Sri Lankans at home.
Lakshman Kadirgamar would have realized that the best and the morally
correct way of neutralizing external threats to our country is by doing
ourselves what needs to be done to build a reconciled and united Sri
Lanka from the ashes of a horrifying internecine war that is now
mercifully behind us. |