Things to think about from Akashi
One time
trouble-shooter in Sri Lanka's conflict, Yasushi Akashi, has
given the world some food for thought on issues, which to him,
constitute very familiar ground. The points made by him which we
front-paged yesterday, should receive the attention of
particularly those sections which have chosen to sit in judgment
on Sri Lanka over questions arising from the controversial
Darusman Report and the infamous Channel 4 video.
Two points, in particular, made by Akashi, need to be the
subject of impartial deliberation. One is that Sri Lanka's
internal inquiry into the issues thrown-up during the last
stages of the conflict should be allowed to proceed without let
or hindrance. The other is that, rather than throw barbs and
brickbats at this country on unfounded allegations, the world
would do well to help in the reconstruction and rehabilitation
effort in Sri Lanka.
To take the first point, the world should take note of the
fact that the Lessons Learnt and Reconciliation (LLRC) process
constitutes Sri Lanka's efforts to bring healing and accord to
its people. It should be given a chance to complete this
undertaking and on the basis of whether this would be done
completely or not Sri Lanka should be judged. However, it should
be clear that the LLRC is yet to complete its task and the world
would do well to allow this to happen, in the name of justice
and fair play.
The LLRC has proceeded some distance in discharging the
responsibilities assigned to it and it could be seen that it
does have the potential to bring healing and reconciliation to
this country. Of course, much remains to be done, and it must go
about accomplishing this without delay but the charge could not
be laid at the LLRC's doorstep that it has been dormant. As we
could see, the LLRC has a great task on its hands in the form of
obtaining the release of those detainees who do not have any
serious allegations against them. Such persons must be released
in increasing numbers and given an opportunity to reintegrate
into mainstream society. Besides, the anxiety and curiosity of
those whose loved ones have apparently gone missing must be
satisfied and their anxiety and worry defused.
We are aware that much has been achieved by the LLRC in the
above areas of concern but much remains to be done too on the
same fronts. More and more concrete progress on these issues
would constitute some of the best answers to this country's
critics. However, there is no denying that these are highly
complex areas of concern on which progress would only be
gradual, and as Akashi said, this internal reconciliation
process should be given time to bear fruit.
By not giving this domestic reconciliation process time to
take effect, Sri Lanka's critics are opening themselves to the
charge of treating the sovereign state of Sri Lanka as being on
par with non-state, anarchic and terroristic organizations such
as the LTTE. Thus are the norms and principles of International
Law blatantly violated by the very same entities which are
charged with perpetuating them.
There is also the consideration that the world should assist
Sri Lanka in the great undertaking of national reconstruction
and rejuvenation, rather than seek to victimize it for doing
what a sovereign state is obliged to do; that is, restore law
and order within a state by eliminating those forces which are
bent on destroying it through the force of arms and terror. One
could recollect the efforts of the big powers of the West to
swiftly rebuild and rejuvenate Asiatic powers which were their
allies during the Second World War, after the war came to an
end. The Western powers also launched the historic Marshall Plan
after the last World War, to put Western Europe on the path of
prosperity and progress. All this and more was done on the
premise that these countries were the allies of the big powers
concerned.
Sri Lanka today, is in the same situation as these allies.
She needs to be helped in the task of national rejuvenation
rather than being wronged for doing what is right. By not going
to Sri Lanka's assistance the big powers are not only resorting
to double standards but are openly violating the norms and
principles of the UN system. For, not only is a sovereign state
being subjected to victimization of the most spiteful kind, but
her entitlements in terms of the UN Charter are being brazenly
overlooked. Clearly, a country which is endeavouring to emerge
from the ravages of a conflict should be selflessly helped by
the rest of the international community. If this is not
happening in Sri Lanka's case, it is clear that she is being
singled out for discriminatory treatment.
We call on the big powers of the international political
system to help maintain International Law by helping to dispense
justice and fair play. Let them not help sow more and more
international anarchy but treating an up and coming developing
country in a blatantly discriminatory fashion. |