Tearing Americans apart:
Groundviews and surrender of terrorists
One factor that emerged during the recent seminar
on Defeating Terrorism were the very different interpretations of
the concept of surrender. David Kilcullen declared at one stage that
the strategy adopted by our forces ‘gave the Tigers no opening to
surrender’. Rohan Guneratne pointed out that this was not the case,
and indeed early on, in February, when the Co-Chairs of the Peace
Process called on the Tigers to surrender, the government would have
certainly accepted this. What government was insistent on, having
repeatedly requested the LTTE to return to Peace Talks, was that any
surrender be unconditional.
Full Story
A note on the making of a chess icon in Sri Lanka
Way back in the early eighties, at a time when
no one in the chess world considered Vishwanathan Anand’s someone
who might one day become the strongest player on the planet, the
strength-difference between players in the subcontinent was
marginal. India was of course had the better players, of whom two,
Manuel Aaron and Ravikumar were International Masters, but the gap
between India’s best at the time (Ravi Sekhar) and Sri Lanka’s top
players (such as Harsha Aturupana, Chandana Goonetilleka, Arjuna
Parakrama and R.D. Gunaratne) did not seem insurmountable.
Full Story
Readiness for a solution to the conflict
“The Tamil people have understood that there is
no alternative but to wage war to win the right to take our own
decisions. By self-decisions it is meant that our right to decide
freely, only by ourselves, without any external interference on
matters that affect our political life.” Velupillai Prabhakaran made
this statement in his last Mahaviru Day Message in 2008. On whatever
grounds attempts were made to hold discussions with them, the
Tiger’s demand was clear. He emphasized by “Right to decide freely
by ourselves without any external interference” was a
‘Confederation’ or ‘United’ status. Or else with the right to exist
as two separate nations in one country.
Full Story
|