Shot in arm for regional
cooperation
Coming close on the heels of the recent limited over
Cricket World Cup, which brought together a number of countries
of South Asia, besides some outside this region, in a spirit of
exemplary camaraderie and gamesmanship, President Mahinda
Rajapaksa’s current official visit to Bangladesh is proof that
the Lankan state is desirous of extending this warmth to the
vital area of regional economic cooperation and other spheres
which impact substantially on the development prospects of South
Asia.
As our initial report indicated yesterday, a number of
mutually-beneficial bilateral agreements would be signed between
Bangladesh and Sri Lanka during the Lankan President’s visit and
this is sure enough proof that economic and material compulsions
are figuring prominently in the fostering and sustenance of
amity between the countries. There is no disputing that in
today’s world, ‘economics are driving politics’ as never before
and that economic relations are playing a pivotal role in
building bridges among countries.
Accordingly, it should not come as a surprise that countries
of this region, such as Bangladesh and Sri Lanka, which favour
pragmatism as the cornerstone of their economic policies, are
making every effort to step-up bilateral economic cooperation.
These are economies that are showing every sign of growing and
nothing could be more natural, in this context, than for them to
stress bilateral cooperation in their respective development
thrusts.
It need hardly be mentioned that Bangladesh and Sri Lanka are
key members of the eight member South Asian Association for
Regional Cooperation (SAARC). In fact Bangladesh is the birth
place of SAARC and the first SAARC Heads of State and Government
Summit was held in Dhaka in 1985. Since then, SAARC has
endeavoured strongly to make regional cooperation in a
multiplicity of spheres a reality, but it could be argued that
strong bilateral ties could act as an impetus to this
cooperative effort.
As we see it, the task before SAARC is to break-down barriers
to regional cooperation and to continually explore the means of
fulfilling each others material and economic needs with the
expectation of developing as a collectivity. Sri Lanka’s
bilateral ties with Bangladesh should be seen as part of this
process of fostering collective economic security. That is,
exploiting economic complementarities between countries
systematically, could be a stepping stone to individual and
collective material empowerment. The underlying logic in this
thinking is that collective well being would be facilitated
greatly by strong individual economies.
It needs to be pointed out in this context that the vastly
growing Lankan economy could be a strong catalyst in regional
economic integration and growth. Over the past few years, Sri
Lanka has emerged as a success story in economic development in
South Asia and many are the ways in which she could help in
boosting regional development through the establishment of
strong economic links with her neighbours. Having earned for
herself the status of a Middle Income Country, she could share
her economic expertise and resources with her neighbours with a
view to enhancing regional economic advancement.
It is against this backdrop that the Lankan President’s
Bangladesh visit needs to be assessed. It is the veritable
extension of a hand of friendship and cooperation to a neighbour
who has proved a very good friend over the years. Like Sri
Lanka, Bangladesh has also found it advisable to follow a
liberal economic policy and there are numerous lessons in
development which the two countries could share. Nevertheless,
both countries have preserved their welfare policies and
connected institutions in their essentials and are today object
lessons to a degree, in combining growth with equity. In other
words, economic pragmatism, as mentioned, is their guiding
principle in the development sphere.
It is time for the countries of this region to look beyond
their narrow geographical boundaries to the booming economies
beyond their borders. Countries such as Sri Lanka and Bangladesh
have done well to combine growth with a measure of equity but a
closer tie-up with the Indian and Chinese economies, for
instance, would enable them to redouble their respective growth
drives.
This needs to be done on a systematic basis, since it is now
realized that the growth centres of the global economy have
shifted to East Asia, that is, our part of the world. However,
they would need to dialogue closely with their more prosperous
and powerful neighbours to ensure that iniquities and anomalies
do not creep into their economic ties with the latter.
While Sri Lanka has proved to be a democratic state with a
welfarist backbone over the years, Bangladesh has made
considerable strides in democratic development. It is clear that
neither state is currently sacrificing democracy for
development. This is one of the reasons why we are unlikely to
see current Middle East type political turmoil in either of the
countries. It is only fitting, therefore, that they keep their
bilateral relationship flourishing because none could deny them
their role model status for other developing countries.
|