Gender difference and education
There is no denying it: boys think
differently from girls. I know this sounds interesting to certain people
and it sounds odd to others. But social equality for boys and girls
really depends on recognizing these differences in brain behaviour. This
could be identified from the kindergarten and it runs till the end of
their life long process of education
Ajith PERERA
Any one who has spent time with children in a playground or school
setting is aware of differences in the way boys and girls respond to
similar situations. For example it is not usually the girls who pull
their hair, punch or fight but the boys. They are mischievous and
playful. Typically, such differences are explained on a cultural basis.
Boys are expected to be more aggressive and play rough games, while
girls are presumably encouraged to be gentle and non-assertive.
After years of exposure to such expectations, the theory goes that
men and women wind up with widely varying behaviourial and intellectual
repertoire. As a corollary, many people believe that if child-rearing
practices could be equalized and sexual stereotypes eliminated, most of
these differences would eventually disappear. The true state of affairs
is not that simple.
Undoubtedly,
many differences, traditionally believed to exist between the genders
are based on stereotypes. But evidence from recent brain research
indicates that some behaviourial differences between men and women are
based on differences in brain functioning that are biologically inherent
and unlikely to be changed by cultural factors alone. One clue to brain
differences between the genders came from observations of infants. One
study found that from shortly after birth, females are more sensitive to
certain types of sounds, particularly to a mother’s voice. In a
laboratory, if the sound of the mother’s sound is displaced to another
part of the room, female babies react while males usually seem oblivious
to the displacement. Female babies are more easily startled by loud
noise.
Tests have shown that girls have increased skin sensitivity,
particularly in the fingertips and are more proficient at fine motor
performance. Females are also generally more attentive to social
contexts-faces, speech patterns, subtle vocal cues. By five months, a
female can distinguish photographs of familiar people, a task rarely
performed well by boys of that age.
Motor performance
At five and eight months, girls will babble to the mother’s face,
seemingly recognizing her as a person, while boys fail to distinguish
between face and a dangling toy, babbling equally to both.
Female infants speak sooner, have larger vocabularies and rarely
demonstrate speech defects. (Stuttering, for instance, occurs almost
exclusively among boys.) Girls exceed boys in language abilities and
this early linguistics bias often prevails throughout life. Girls read
sooner, learn foreign languages more easily and, as a result, are more
likely to enter occupations involving language mastery. Boys in
contrast, show an early visual superiority. Their intentional mechanisms
are also different. A boy will react to an inanimate object as quickly
as he will to a person. A male baby will often ignore the mother and
babble to something else.
A study of pre-school children by psychologist Diane McGuinness of
Stanford University found boys are more curious, especially with regard
to exploring their environment. Her studies also confirmed that males
are better at manipulating three-dimensional space. When boys and girls
are asked to mentally rotate or fold an object, boys overwhelmingly
outperform girls. “I folded it in my mind” is a typical male response.
Girls are likely to produce elaborate verbal descriptions which, because
they are less appropriate to the task, result in frequent errors.
Brain organization
There is evidence that some of these differences in performance are
differences in brain organization between girls and boys. Overall,
verbal and spatial abilities in boys tend to be packaged into different
hemispheres: the right hemisphere for non-verbal tasks, the left for
verbal tasks. But in girls non-verbal and verbal skills are likely to be
found on both sides of the brain. The hemispheres of the women’s brain
may be less specialized for these functions. These differences in brain
organization and specialization are believed by some scientists to
provide a partial explanation of why members of one sex or the other are
under-represented in certain professions. Architects, for example,
require a highly developed spatial sense, a skill found more frequently
among men. Thus, the preponderance of male architects may be partially
caused by the more highly developed spatial sense that characterizes the
male brain.
Psychological measurements of brain functioning between sexes also
show unmistakable differences. Most thought-provoking of all are
findings by Eleanor Maccoby and Carol Nagy Jacklin of Stanford
University on personality traits and intellectual achievement.
They found that intellectual development in girls is fostered among
individuals who are assertive and active, and have a sense that they can
control, by their own action, the events that affect their lives. These
factors appear to be less important in the intellectual development of
boys.
Recent studies even suggest that high level of intellect achievement
is associated with cross-sex typing: the ability to express traits and
interest associated with the opposite sex. Educational Psychologist E.
P. Torrance of the University of Georgia suggest that sexual stereo
types are a block to creativity, since creativity requires sensitivity-
a female trait- as well as autonomy and independence- traits usually
associated with males. M P Honzik and J W Mcfarlane of the University of
California at Berkley support Torance’s speculation with a 20 year
follow-up on subjects who demonstrated significant IQ gains. Those with
the greatest gains displayed less than those whose IQs remained
substantially the same.
It's important to remember that we are not talking about one gender
being generally superior or inferior to another. In addition, the
studies are statistical and do not tell us a lot about individuals. The
findings are controversial, but they can help us establish true equity.
One way of doing this might be to change such practices as nationwide
competitive examinations.
If boys for instance, truly excel in right-hemisphere tasks,
scholastic aptitude tests should be substantially redesigned to assure
that both genders have an equal chance.
Some of the tests now are weighted with items that virtually
guarantee superior male performance.
Attitude changes are also needed in our approach to "hyperactive" or
"learning disabled" children. The evidence for gender difference here is
staggering: more than 90 percent of hyperactive are males.
This is not surprising since the male brain is primarily visual,
while classroom instructions demand attentive listening. The male brain
learns by manipulating its environment, yet the typical student is
forced to sit still for long hours in the classroom. There is little
opportunity, other than during recess, for gross motor movements or
rapid muscular responses. In essence, the classrooms in developed
countries' primary grades are geared to skill that come naturally to
girls but develop very slowly in boys. The result should not be
surprising, a 'learning disabled' child who is also frequently
'hyperactive.'
We now have the opportunity, based on emerging evidence of gender
differences in brain functioning, to restructure elementary grades so
that boys find their initial educational contacts less stressful.
At more advanced levels of instruction, teaching methods could
incorporate verbal and linguistic approaches to physical engineering and
architecture (to mention only three fields where women are conspicuously
under represented). The alternative is to do nothing about brain
differences.
There is something to be said for this approach, too. In recent past,
enhanced social benefit has usually resulted from stressing the
similarities between people rather than their differences. We ignore
brain-sex differences, however, at the risk of confusing biology with
sociology and wishful thinking with scientific fact.
Parents need to be prudent. They ought to respect and accept the
individual difference as well as the gender difference that matters in
their children's performances. Moreover, there could be late bloomers in
their families.
If a girl in a family is studious and a boy who is clever at motor
mechanism parents should not force the boy to follow in the footsteps of
his sister because the boy's ability is different from the girl's. While
the girl excels in education, the boy could excel in his chosen field.
Helping and guiding them to cope with their desired or selected field is
the main responsibility of the parents, teachers and elders. |