Plans to recruit Attorneys as ASPs
I refer to the news item under the above headline in the Daily News
on February 26, 2011.
Developed countries such as USA has a very efficient system of State
Attorneys and Magistrates mediating to conduct criminal investigations
right from the beginning. In this regard the AG’s Department may have a
District Office in each district under the supervision of a District
Attorney who would supervise investigations. It is not ideal to recruit
Attorneys-at-Law as ASPs which ultimately bear the same result due to
obvious reasons. The AG’s Department could be expanded.
However, an Attorney-at-Law is a profession of an advisory and
independent nature that requires thorough learning once enrolled. The
status of the profession is being downgraded on many fronts. The latest
being the salary anomaly created in the PA Circular No 6 of 2006.
All Attorneys-at-Law recruited to the public service were being paid
one basic salary from the time of Colonial Masters. Assistant State
Attorneys and legal officers of the Ministries and Departments were
recruited on the same qualification of being an Attorney-at-Law.
The reasons were its unique advisory and independent nature and
non-availability of promotions to various posts as in the case of
members of Sri Lanka Administrative Service (SLAS).
The National Salaries and Cadres Commission has categorized law
professionals into two viz under circular 06/2006 paying one category, a
basic salary of Rs 28,280 and others Rs 22,220 along with executive
officers who are recruited to the SLAS without any training from
graduates and those who have more than 10 years service in the
Management Assistants’ Service.
They do not belong to an independent profession.
Attorneys-at-Law in the Ministries and Departments though now
categorized as executive officers are not entitled to promotions given
to SLAS officers. The legal officers are too made to sit the Efficiency
Bars applicable to SLAS officers under the said Circular which has never
been the case hitherto.
The reason for such downgrading is said to be because there are
enough Attorneys-at-Law in Sri Lanka. A profession may be full of
people. But when recruiting, candidates with integrity, good learning
and professional quality should be selected.
Categorization of Lawyers as Law Officers and Legal Officers is
irrational. State Attorneys prepare briefs for the State Counsel
similarly legal officers attend to legal work in the Ministries and
Departments although the latter do not prepare briefs they are too
instructing attorneys.
Recruitment of lawyers to the public service requires one and the
same basic qualification. It is a sheer discrimination against Lawyers
to divide them into two categories under the said circular which to the
minds of the intelligent and the learned cannot be justified at all.
Ranjith Rodrigo
Waskaduwa
|