Akashi’s advice
Sri Lanka is just emerging from the ashes of war and
it needs all the support it can muster from the international
community in rebuilding a battered nation. But this should not
be extended to telling Sri Lanka how it should go about
reconciling with who are after all a section of our own people.
The Government is in a better position to decide the best
course that is appropriate. Besides reconciliation has to come
from within and involves certain dynamics which no outsider can
comprehend.
It has been Sri Lanka’s lot over the years to be lectured and
hectored to by the West on what is the best solution to what was
termed the ethnic problem. We have had too many busybodies
descending on us with plentiful advice even on how the war
should be conducted.
One recalls how the US offered to accept the surrender of the
Prabhakaran and other LTTE leaders during the tail end of the
war. Similarly there were many mediators in the past who were
trying to bring about reconciliation. Had their prognosis being
adhered to, the war would still be on and Prabhakaran very much
alive.
It is common knowledge that since the beginning of the ethnic
conflict in Sri Lanka many countries tried their utmost to
interfere in its affairs. Most of them wanted us try out various
solutions all of which however stopped short of a military
solution. These countries wanted a negotiated settlement to what
was a basically a terrorist problem.
Some even wanted to us try out political systems operating in
their own countries as a means to an end. One recalls how our
Parliamentarians were taken on tours to Western countries to
study systems of Government which firebrand MP Wimal Weerawansa
derisively called Federal Vandanawa.
So called peace talks too were held in several world capitals
to work out a devolution package. There were also demands for an
Interim administration to be granted to the LTTE by some
countries.
Had these countries succeeded, Sri Lanka would today have
been a fragmented nation. It is to the eternal credit of
President Mahinda Rajapaksa that he correctly identified the
problem for what it was and applied the correct remedy that saw
a hitherto invincible terrorist outfit completely vanquished.
Now that the war is ended and the long awaited peace restored
one would have imagined that Sri Lanka would be left alone. But
it seems the cacophony of voices has risen to a new level with
some wanting the country to be hauled over the coals for alleged
war crimes.
For all intents and purposes those countries which were
meddling in our affairs had not stopped their badgering. Even
after the elimination of terrorism and the country returning to
peace some countries keep on harping on their old mantras of
devolution while other have shifted gear and have started
attacking us on a different flank. This at a time the country is
emerging out of the ashes and striving to heal old wounds on the
road to reconciliation.
That is why the observation made by Japanese Peace Envoy
Yashushi Akashi assumes relevance. Addressing the media on his
20th visit to Sri Lanka he hit out at the so called
international community enjoining it not to dictate terms to Sri
Lanka.
“It is not for other governments or international
organizations to dictate to Sri Lanka as to what it should be
doing in the highly complicated and sensitive area of post war
reconciliation.”
All patriotic Sri Lankans will no doubt rise to toast to
Akashi who over the years had been close friend of Sri Lanka and
is well familiar with the dynamics involved in any
reconciliation process.
Naturally such a process should evolve from within. It is
through introspection and understanding that reconciliation
could come about between the long estranged communities. This
cannot happen with by an artificially imposed solution from
outside.
Akashi said Sri Lanka has to design its own reconciliation
program. This is exactly the same sentiments expressed by
President Mahinda Rajapaksa in his victory day speech in
Parliament last year. He said he was willing to grant devolution
but it should be a devolution based on home grown solution.
No country can impose a reconciliation model on a sovereign
state. Beside the problems of a country is unique to itself. The
sooner the international community realizes this, the greater
the service it would be doing for Sri Lanka. |