Honour, reputation and outliving ...
Guard your honour. Let your
reputation fall where it will. And outlive the bastards. - Lois McMaster
Bujold, author
Elections
are tense events, more so for those seeking political office than for
those who elect them. First of all there are the anxieties suffered by
individual political parties, especially those that are not frontrunners
and indeed face the real threat of being wiped out. Then we have the
individuals, both among the favourites and the probable losers. They
spend scandalous amounts of money and wonder if they will get elected.
The tension must have risen during the counting of preferential
votes. Counting takes time and since candidates who end up lower down in
the list and out of the list typically ask for recounts it takes almost
48 hours after the polls close for us to find out who will represent us
in Parliament, i.e. long after we know how many seats each party has,
who is going to form the Government etc.
Indeed, there are lots of horror stories circulating regarding how
the count was done with some (the losers, naturally) claiming that there
were individuals who had lost in the initial count but had somehow got
the numbers necessary to enter Parliament in subsequent counts. I am not
in a position to claim that there has been wrongdoing, but I believe
that there is sufficient doubt in the minds of the general public to
warrant a thorough investigation.
It is not an inter-party issue of course. Whether Candidate X from
Party A is in or out won’t change the political complexion of the
Parliament; Party A will continue to have a P number of MPs and Party B
will still have a Q number. The problem is whether or not Candidate X
was robbed by Candidate Y (both being from Party A).
Now I understand that the stakes are pretty high for the particular
individuals. Hundreds of millions of rupees are poured into an election
campaign by the average candidate, unless you are a Champika Ranawaka or
a Ven. Athureliye Rathana or (at least in this election) a Milinda
Moragoda. Or you are such a no-hoper that you won’t even bother to
campaign. So most candidates at the margin would naturally fight tooth
and nail to get to some place where their investment can generate some
yield (lose, and it’s good money gone waste).
It seems to me that taken as a whole politicians and the voters (yes,
we vote them in, the good, the bad, the ugly, the crooked, the thugs,
the racketeers, the traitors) missed the moral but somewhere down the
line. Sure, one can take solace in the performance of the non-spenders
or the less-spenders.
One can calculate cost-per-voter and re-assess the popularity level
of individual candidates and feel happy that Candidate C and Candidate R
who ran clean(er) campaign did far better than Candidate D and Candidate
W who did not want to differentiate between campaigning and vandalizing.
Still, by and large, these are pitiful consolation prizes, aren’t they?
Well, guess what, it’s we who give ourselves prizes and if we were dumb
enough to be swayed by strong arms and show of wealth, then we cannot
complain.
I still maintain that we’ve lost our way. In Colombo, for example,
there were a few people who didn’t have a ghost of a chance. They
campaigned to the extent they felt was necessary. They didn’t whine and
weep. It was always going to get ugly at the margin, i.e. between those
who were barely ‘in’ at any of the counts and those who out just ‘out’.
They fought. And they tore each others clothes and this not being enough
rippled off whatever remained in their own attire.
Overall, as I have argued many times over the past few months, we
have got just consolation prizes and I wonder at times if we as a people
even deserve these little crumbs that the political process toss towards
us.
We are a nation and a society that can do much better. After all, did
we not defeat the world’s most ruthless terrorist outfit, recover from
two bloody insurrections and a devastating tsunami and have we not
refused to go under even after 32 years of the J R Jayewardene
constitution? We are a resilient nation, yes, but in the matter of being
circumspect in our political decisions we’ve not exactly done ourselves
proud, have we?
I think we can do better and this is why I believe it won’t any of us
to think a little about the Bujold quote above. Let me repeat: ‘Guard
your honour. Let your reputation fall where it will. And outlive the
bastards.’
Depending on where one stands politically and what one’s ‘ideal
scenario’ is, one would call different people ‘bastard’ of course, but
the drift is clear. We have to dig in, take the bouncers, watch for
swing, late and otherwise, and wait until the sun is out and the pitch
dries out. This is not a 20-20 match or even a one-dayer. It is a Test.
Twenty eight years ago, writing a piece about scouting at Royal for a
souvenir commemorating the 40th anniversary of 42nd Colombo, my father
made this recommendation which I have gone back to a countless number of
times since:
‘And so, if it is not prudent to stand ramrod straight in the fact of
storms beyond your strength, you have to let them pass over you. Stand
firm if you can, retreat if you must. Above all, never panic.’
Some people are impatient. They panic. They drown. Even as they are
crowned in the capital and hailed as benefactors of humankind regardless
of all the blood that has flowed and flowed (ref: Dostoyevsky, ‘Crime
and Punishment’).
We got to outlive the ‘bastards’ (I don’t like the term, by the way,
for all children are ‘legitimate’). And this includes, the bastards
within ourselves.Let us not forget this, while we wait for President
Rajapaksa to launch a full scale investigation into the counting of
preferential votes.
[email protected] |