Discrimination against Non-Western laws
Peter Baofu
Recent events like Google’s complaint about censorship in China, a
British woman’s being prosecuted for having illicit sex in Dubai, and a
British man’s being convicted of drug smuggling in China had received
swift criticisms against the host countries from both governments and
mass media in the West.
Yet, what many Western governments and mass media do not want to tell
the world is something more troubling, that is, the widespread Western
neo-colonial discrimination against non-Western laws — while they
strictly expect, as a matter of right, the respect by non-Western
nationals and organizations towards Western laws when these non-Western
nationals and organizations are in the West.
West needs to have a closer look at non-western values. AFP |
Inhumane consequence
This widespread Western neo-colonial discrimination has its inhumane
consequence for the world. Let me explain this troubling phenomenon
below, with the three examples (as cited above) for illustration.
Firstly, in the first example concerning Google’s threat to leave
China unless the Chinese Government lifts its censorship (like
“filtering” search results) and stops its alleged “cyber attacks” — the
mainstream coverage (of this controversy) in Western mass media is more
fact-twisting than fact-reporting.
Google is not as innocent as its complaint may sound. Many people do
not know that Google has been collaborating for years with “the CIA, the
FBI, the National Security Agency, and other intelligence agencies” for
global spying, as reported by Steve Watson back in March of 2008. As
explained by Watson, “Google’s partnership with the intelligence network
is not new....An ex-CIA agent Robert David Steele...elaborated on
previous revelations...that the CIA helped bankroll Google at its very
inception. Steele named Google’s CIA point man as Dr. Rick Steinheiser,
of the Office of Research and Development.”
Closed source database
Steele thus explained: “Google took money from the CIA when it was
poor and it was starting up and unfortunately our system right now
floods money into spying and other illegal and largely unethical
activities, and it doesn’t fund what I call the open source
world....They’ve been together for quite a while. “More specifically,
for Watson, “Google is supplying the software, hardware and tech support
to US intelligence agencies who are in the process of creating a vast
closed source database for global spy networks to share information.”
By 2007, according to Watson, “new programs of internet monitoring”
were created “by a freshly created department branch of Homeland
Security [DHS] called the National Applications Office” — and these
programs “allow...the DHS to regulate and control access to the internet
in the name of ‘protecting’ national security....[And] the NSA has
increasing control over SSL, now called Transport Layer Security, the
cryptographic protocol that provides secure communications on the
internet for web browsing, e-mail, instant messaging, and other data
transfers. In other words the agency is capable of intercepting and
reading...emails and instant messages in real time.”
In 2007, as Watson continued, “US National Intelligence Director Mike
McConnell is drawing up plans for cyberspace spying that would make the
current debate on warrantless wiretaps look like a ‘walk in the park.’
The plan would mean giving the government the authority to examine the
content of any e-mail, file transfer or Web search” for global spying.
Dubious side
The Chinese side seems to be well aware of this dubious side of
Google and other related companies doing business in China. For
instance, on January 27, 2010, He Jiazheng, the President of People’s
Daily Online, revealed, in an article concerning Google, that “the
United States...is shifting its strategic focus from the military to the
Internet. It is against this backdrop that Google becomes a tool of the
country’s Internet hegemony. What makes a multinational company as big
as Google intervene in the security and social policies of another
sovereign state?
Obviously, the case is not as simple as corporate decision-making of
a business, but an act driven by other hidden factors.” In other words,
not only “Google has filtered a lot of online posts on the ground that
they are of...anti-American rhetoric” but also it has worked together
with the U.S. intelligence network for years.
Another recent article in People’s Daily (on January 23, 2010)
revealed that the U.S. call for “Internet freedom” is part of its
clandestine efforts “to infiltrate China,” with the help of Google and
other companies (like “Twitter” and “YouTube,” as cited in the article).
Difference in law in the non-west territory should be accepted.
AFP |
Software ‘bugs’
In 2002, “a CIA Internet spying plot was disclosed by the British
media, saying the CIA sought to collect information by breaking into
giant companies, banks and governmental organs and organizations across
the world. Under the cover of a high-tech civil company, the CIA took
cooperated with a software development company in the Silicon Valley to
design software ‘bugs’ to collect information via the Internet. The
spying software binding with normal software would install automatically
once a netizen started to use the normal software,” as pointed out in
the same article.
In addition, “according to a Hong Kong media agency, the CIA invests
tens of millions of US dollars every year to aid ‘Chinese net traitors’
to infiltrate Chinese net users with US ideology. They haunt major
Chinese forums and portals. A website called ‘Wazhe Online’ (Chinese
Pinyin) is a secret mission with the cooperation of US Government
institutions and overseas ‘Tibetan splittist organizations’ with the
tasks of agitating, deluding, infiltrating and instigating Chinese net
users, making up rumours to initiate riots and collecting information
via the Internet.
A Tibetan youth who once worked with one organization said it is an
online spy agency which is supported by the US financially, controlled
by the Americans and serves the Americans. A commentary on Hong
Kong-based Ta Kung Pao said those who publish stories sensitive to
China’s policies on the net have complex backgrounds and are hired by US
and Japanese spy agencies,” as pointed out in the same article.
Therefore, reality is not what Google and the mainstream Western mass
media would like us to believe.
Western values
Secondly, in regard to the second example concerning a British
woman’s being prosecuted for having illicit sex in Dubai” — the
mainstream coverage (of this controversy) in Western mass media
continues its spinning against non-Western laws.
For instance, the Economist in the U.K. published an article on
January 14, 2010 which condemned the arrest of a “23-year-old British
woman” and who “was barred from leaving the country while awaiting
trial,” because “on New Year’s Day she told police she had been raped
the previous evening by a waiter at a five-star hotel,” and “the police
arrested her after she revealed during questioning that she had drunk
alcohol and had sex with her fiance, with whom she was on holiday.”
It is well-known that “under sharia law, sex out of wedlock and the
drinking of alcohol are illegal” in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), as
the Economist acknowledged but condemned it anyway. In other words, so
the hidden excuse goes, it is not right for a Westerner to get punished
for drinking alcohol and have sex out of wedlock in an Islamic country
like UAE; Western values are to be respected too, so the excuse goes,
because these Westerners are not Arab Muslims and should be treated
differently.
Courtesy: Pravda, To be continued
|