Conflict as theme in cinema
Turning
our glance towards cinema this week, I recall a recent film that had
quite an impact on me -Alimankada by Chandran Rutnam. Basing the story
on ‘The Road From Elephant Pass’ by Nihal de Silva, the film is indeed a
bold attempt of discussing the war and two seemingly opposing view
points, that also reveal through the continuous dialogues of the two
main protagonists, the confusion that warring parties get in to, as they
attempt to define the situation according to their individual beliefs!
As the two main characters of the film are forced to proceed along
their perilous journey, undercover, we see hostility and distrust
emanating from them. However, with each incident that they have to
collectively face, the element of trust continuously develops in their
relationship. It is noteworthy how Rutnam maintains a perfect balance in
developing the relationship especially during the journey through the
forest, without an overly sentimental approach, although countless
opportunities are present, to move towards such engagement.
In that, he is a step ahead of the book. Even much later in the film,
as they accept each other as partners, it is largely depicted through
the bathing scene the following morning, when their reaction to each
other portrays the new status in their relationship. However, as they
move away from the rustic environment, and enter the confines of the
Colombo based friend’s refuge where they have to part company, it is
felt that the authenticity of the sequence is somewhat impaired, leading
to the ‘happy-family’ ending at a cosy flat, as the film states, in
Canada.
A scene depicting hostility and distrust in Alimankada |
Given the dearth in quality local films with an engaging and
intellectually captivating storyline, I must say, Alimankada definitely
has created a niche for itself, with its cinematic depiction of ‘The
Road From Elephant Pass’.
When discussing conflict as a theme, or at least a backdrop, two
other recently watched films come to my mind. Both the films were
released in 2008 and won international acclaim and were voted among the
best ten films of that year, by several prestigious establishments. The
film, ‘The Reader’ by Stephen Daldry is based on a German novel of the
same name by Bernhard Schlink and was adapted to screen by well known
dramatist and script writer David Hare. It stars Kate Winslet and Ralph
Fiennes with young actor David Kross depicting his early years. It is
the story of a German lawyer who as a teenager had an affair with a
woman twice his age, who suddenly disappears and resurfaces years later
as a defendant in a war crimes trail, for her involvement as a guard at
a Nazi concentration camp in World War II. In a wonderfully placed
sequence, the film discusses a range of areas including, emotions,
truth, reconciliation, justice, literacy and literature, appreciation,
and responsibility.
Superbly captured on camera, it shows a master hand that is able to
keep his distance rather than get exceedingly emotional about the
content. Although the ending has a well made element worked in, the film
in its entity is a subtle exploration of many nuances, definitely worth
watching.
‘Hunger’, by Steve McQueen is another film released in 2008 that
discusses conflict in quite a different setting. It reveals the last six
weeks in the life of the Irish Rupublican Army (IRA) hunger striker
Bobby Sands, who led the 1981 Irish hunger strike, participating in the
‘no wash’ protest.
It has received much acclaim internationally as a significant film
and it definitely is a very mature film indeed by a first time film
director. Michael Fassbender as Boddy Sands engages the viewer with an
almost too real, depiction of the political prisoner who fasts unto
death.
Interestingly, ‘Hunger’ contains a 16 and a half minute single shot
in which a priest tries to talk Bobby Sands out of his protest campaign.
It is believed to be the longest shot in a mainstream film, and, with
its placement at a crucial point in the film, captivates the audience,
as we try to decipher the dialogue ensuing between the priest and the
prisoner.
With captivating cinematography all along, Sands moment of death is
depicted in vivid meditating detail, after the violence, cruelty, and
inhuman treatment as the protest continues within the confines of the
prison. Finally, the death of Sands with nine others, forces the British
government to agree to the demands of prisoner rights despite never
officially granting political status to the prisoners.
‘Hunger’ is a raw and powerful film where the body is offered as the
last resource for protest.
The strong visual aspect of the film medium should be a powerful
player in cinematic creations. If this infinite power of cinema is not
understood sufficiently, dialogue based, mere teledrama-like sequences
that populate the television screen, will form a poor substitute to the
film-viewing public.
[email protected] |