BFL's ratings reaffirmed at BBB-/P3
RAM Ratings Lanka has reaffirmed Bartleet Finance Limited's ("BFL" or
"the Company") long- and short-term ratings at BBB- and P3. However, the
outlook on the long-term rating has been revised from stable to
negative. This is premised on the heightened delinquencies from certain
loan segments, which have pressured the Company's capital position.
Nonetheless, BFL's ratings are still supported by its established
franchise and improved liquidity position.
BFL celebrated its 25th anniversary in November 2008. The Company is
part of the Bartleet Group, a local conglomerate that has been in
business for over a century. However, BFL remains a small player in the
registered finance company ("RFC"), accounting for only 1.77 percent of
the industry's asset base as at end-March 2009. Although the Company
provides retail loans, it focuses on the disbursement of leases and
hire-purchase ("HP") facilities.
"We note that BFL's core portfolio of leases and HP facilities has
remained healthier than the industry's. However, the Company's overall
gross non-performing loans ("NPL") ratio has been weakened by defaults
in few loan categories. On the other hand, BFL's portfolio of leases and
HP facilities, which accounted for 87.36 percent of its total loans at
end-September 2009, stayed healthy due to the Company's good recovery
and monitoring efforts. The default rate on the Company's combined
portfolio of HP facilities and leases clocked in at 4.47 percent as at
the same date."
"Meanwhile, we observe some concentration risk in its loan portfolio.
Loan concentration renders the quality of the Company's credit portfolio
volatile, as a few defaults can result in a substantial jump in NPLs. In
this context, the Company's gross NPL ratio had climbed up to 8.87
percent as at end-September 2009 (end-March 2009: 3.00 percent), driven
by defaults on few large loans from its cheque-discounting portfolio.
Defaults from this portfolio accounted for 24.42 percent of BFL's total
NPLs as at end-September 2009. We note that these had originated from a
few long-standing customers that had been affected by the economic
downturn. We also note that the Company had curtailed lending following
the RFC crisis in Sri Lanka, instead focusing on improving its
liquidity."
"With high cost deposits being channelled to liquid assets, which
yield less compared to credit assets, BFL's financial performance
weakened in FYE 31 March 2009 ("FY Mar 2009"). The Company's net
interest margin ("NIM") narrowed from 12.08 percent to 9.10 percent
year-on-year ("y-o-y") (1H FY Mar 2010: 6.21 percent). We observe that
BFL's large deposit base had been re-priced at a faster pace amid rising
interest rates while loan growth had been restricted; this had hindered
the Company's ability to pass on the increase in interest rates.
|