Crime does not pay
Ananda JAYASENA Senior SSP (Rtd)
January 23rd 1974 was a Friday. Around 9.30 a.m. I was at the
Panadura Police Station, having finished the weekly instruction and
discussion class for my subordinate officers. A telephone call was put
through to my office, and the caller was one Waduge Thomas Fernando of
32, Sea Beach Road, Panadura, who passed the information of a dead body
floating in the sea, about 50 yards away from the beach.
I called P.C. 2844 in the Minor Offence Branch, and sent him with a
party of men to look into the matter. Around 1.15 p.m. P.C. Perera
informed me that the dead body had been just washed ashore, and that the
body was that of a female, who had cut injuries on her body.
Highly decomposed
May I.P. Crimes, T.N. Rajee, and I promptly visited the scene. The
body was that of a full grown female, wit very long hair. She was
dressed only in a home made brassiere, and there was a large gaping gash
in the abdomen, and also there were cut injuries on the neck. The body
was fully bloated and highly decomposed. It had also changed in colour,
having floated in water for a long period of time. The Magistrate,
Weeraratne, of Panadura was informed, and he ordered D.C. de Silva -
J.P.U.M. to hold the inquest, and report the facts to Court.
De Silva view the body that same evening, and also visited scene, and
ordered the J.M.O. Colombo to hold a post-mortem examination on the body
of the deceased, instructing Police to take the dead body to the general
morgue at Francis Road, Borella.
I contacted the J.M.O., Dr. W.D.L. Fernando, at his residence at
Edmonton Road, Kirillapona, who informed me that he would personally
hold the post-mortem on the following morning.
On the 24th Saturday morning, P.C. 2484 Perera, I.P. Rajee, and I
came for the post-mortem examination to the general morgue. The J.M.O.
who re-commenced the post-mortem at 9.00 a.m. finished at 11.55 a.m. He
was of the opinion that death could have occurred about 6-7 days
earlier, and that the deceased was a woman of about 24 years of age, and
had been in the early stages of pregnancy. There had been a sharp cut
across the abdomen, starting from the right side of the body to the
left, and the intestines were protruding. Also, there were two sharp
cuts on her throat, extending from right to left. Also, her lungs were
filled with water. The assailant was most probably a left-hander.
According to the J.M.O. she had also been sexually assaulted just before
she died.
Finger prints
At the post-mortem examination, I got two sets of fingerprints of the
deceased through the post-mortem labourer, as body could not be
approached due to the stench. On our return to Panadura we visited the
office of the Registrar of Finger Prints at Torrington Square, and met
the Registrar of Finger Prints. He was Inspector Neil Ratnayake, a
batch-mate of mine, who had undergone specialized training in finger
prints in England. I told him about the case, and he promised to trace
the prints, if there was a record available with them.
On return to the Police Station, we sent islandwide messages to all
police stations, regarding the description of the dead body with cut
injuries.
Eloped
After 4 days I.P. Neil Ratnayake contacted me, and informed me that
the Finger Prints belonged to one Chelliah Parvathy, daughter of
Kanapathi Chellaih of division 02, Paradise Estate, Kuruwita, and that
she had been employed under Clare Daniel of No. 22, Farm Road,
Mattakkuliya, from 1970, and this Mrs. Daniel had registered her with
the Servants Registry in Colombo.
I.P. Rajee went to Matatakkuliya and recorded a statement in detail
of Mrs. Daniel. According to her, this Parvathy was brought to
Mattakkuliya by her father in 1970, and in December 1970 her father
died, and she went to the funeral at Kuruwita, and returned after a
week.
According to Daniel, sometime in 1972, she ran away with a barber
named Sandanam, and a complaint to this effect was made to Modera Police
by her, and the parties were summand to the Police Station. At the
Police Station, Parvathi refused to comeback to Mrs. Daniel. And she
being a major, the Police allowed her to go with Sandanma, having
recorded both Sandanam’s and her statements.
Daniel being a meticulous lady, had all the references with dates of
the complaint she had made to Modera Police, Inspector Rajee having
recorded the statement of Daniel, had visited the shanty where the
couple lived.
Statement
One Rasiah lived there at the time of the visit. Inspector Rajee had
recorded the statement of Rasiah. Rasiah had stated that Sandanam had
informed him that Parvathi was frightened to stay in the shanty alone,
hence he had left her at Kuruwita at her mother’s place, and that he
himself would be going to work in the estate. He had taken Rs. 2,500
from Rasiah, and had given the shanty to him. According to him, this had
taken place at sometime in the end of January.
I contacted the OIC Modera Police, and got the certified Information
Book extracts of the statements made by Mrs. Daniel, and later by
Parvathi and Sandanam.
We made inquiries about Sandanam, but there was no information
forthcoming. We again contacted Rasiah, who now lived in Sandanam’s
shanty. He too did not know the present whereabouts of Sandanam.
Time went by. After about two months, OIC Modera sent me a letter
through a person. I opened this letter, and the person who brought this
letter was Rasiah.
According to him, he had gone to Ratnapura on the day before, and
whilst coming back by bus, he had seen Sandanam working in a barber
saloon at Eheliyagoda.
I summoned I.P. Rajee and sent him with P.C. 2482 Perera and Rasiah
in a Police vehicle to Eheliyagoda to arrest Sandanam. I.P. Rajee had
found him in a barber saloon, and had brought him to Panadura Police
Station.
I.P. Rajee and I interrogated Sandanma during the night. He made a
clean breast of his guilt. His story was as follows: He was from
Lollupitiya Estate, but had not seen or met Parvathi at Paradise Estate
in Kuruwita.
He first saw her at Mrs. Daniel’s at No. 22, Farm Road, and whenever
she came to buy provisions from the boutique, he met her, and thereby
developed a love affair, and finally eloped with her. On a complaint
made by Mrs. Daniel, they were brought to Modera Police Station, and
Parvathi refused to go back to Mrs. Daniel.
He made a statement at Modera Police, stating that he would marry
Parvathi, and left with her. They built a shanty on Crow Island, near
the large canal, and lived there. Time went by, he felt that his wife
was friendly with a man from the adjoining house. He was a postal peon
by profession.
Thovil ceremony
On the day of the incident he left the house at around 8.30 p.m.
informing his wife that he was going to a thovil ceremony, at a friend’s
house in Grandpass, and that he would return in the morning. But he
returned at 11.00 p.m. He saw his wife and the postman sleeping on a
mat. He took a barber’s razor and chased after the man, but he ran away.
He was furious, and he did not know what he was doing, but he remembered
cutting his wife with the razor. It was raining in torrents, and the
time was about 12 midnight. He carried his wife, who was still groaning
with pain, dumped the body in the canal, and saw it being carried away
by the current, towards the sea. He hid the barber’s razor in the
shrubs, washed the house, and went away.
I.P. Rajee and P.C. 2482 Perera took the accused, having recorded his
statement, and recovered the barber’s razor hidden by him. We noticed
that he was a left hander.
Filed pliant
I.P. Rajee filed pliant in the M.C. Panadura, under Section 296
Criminal Procedure Code against the accused, and after the conclusion of
non-summary proceedings, the case was committed to the Supreme Court.
In May 1974 the case came up for trial at the Supreme Court Kalutara
and the accused was indicted by the Attorney General under Section
296-CPC.
The Crown Counsel led the evidence of the J.M.O. Dr. W.D.L. Fernando,
which took two hours exactly.
After this evidence, the defence counsel informed the judge he wanted
to plead “guilty under grave and sudden provocation”. The Crown agreed
to this plea, and the judge allowed the same. The judge sentenced the
accused to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment. It was subsequently revealed
that the accused served in prison for years and had one more week to
finish his period in jail. He got involved in a brawl, and was stabbed
to death by a fellow prisoner with a pointed iron implement.
(Name of the accused and the deceased are fictitious. Others are
genuine.) |