Once more on Universities
President Mahinda
Rajapaksa has called for high ethical standards and social
responsibility from those products of the country's higher
education system.
Delivering the Convocation Address at the conferment of Post
Graduate Degrees of the Colombo University on Sunday the
President noted that Sri Lanka not only needs well-educated
specialists from its higher education system but also expects it
to produce individuals with high ethical standards and social
responsibility.
The President no doubt was targeting those youth resorting to
violent agitation in our universities and others who decamp our
shores after making maximum use of our free education system.
This indeed is a curious paradox, for more often than not it
is those who were left out of free University education who
appear to serve the country with dedication and distinction. As
the President noted there were countless number of war heroes
who missed a university education under the present system. It
is a travesty that while they spilt their blood for the country
their more fortunate colleagues were spilling blood in the
campuses in violent agitation. Hence the President's allusion to
ethics and responsibility.
What about the financial burden on the Government which has
no way of knowing if the country will receive its due returns
one day from those who enjoy free education. At what cost are
universities maintained?
It goes without saying that prolonged closure of universities
is a strain on the financial resources of the State. For, while
the campuses remain closed, it has to pay the university staff,
the workforce and also meet other overhead expenses.
Paradoxically the Government who pays for the education of the
university entrants is also called upon to incur additional
expenses to cater to their indulgences while a large segment of
students who may be more productive and turn out to be assets to
the country are left out in the cold. It is time that the
Government takes cognizance of the whole picture of our
university education and make a cost benefit assessment. Perhaps
like many other transformations contemplated in the post war era
the country's higher education system too would come under the
microscope of the authorities. The system is lop-sided to say
the least.
As the President observed in his speech the Universities can
cater to only 20,000 students annually while around 100,000 are
left behind due to want of financial resources to enrol the
entire cadres who get through their AL examination.
On the face of it this seems a grave injustice given the
lengths to which some poor parents go to find the means to
educate their off-spring to secure for them a better future.
This, the President hinted should weigh on the conscience of
those fortunate to gain entry for higher education. He has
therefore called on them to lend a helping hand to their
colleagues left behind to better their lot. But today any
attempt to cater to the needs of those who missed out on
university admission is bound to trigger violent protests with
accusations of privatizing higher education by mainstream
students. The best example was the attempt to commence private
medical colleges (NCMC) in the late eighties especially to cater
to those who failed to obtain the necessary marks to enter the
Medical Faculty.
It is in this backdrop that the President also spoke of the
need to find alternative avenues of higher education outside the
University system to accommodate those who missed out, to meet
the growing social demand for higher education to fit into the
modern day labour market.
Even here they are bound to eclipse their University
counterparts engaged in certain study streams that do not cater
to modern job demands. Here too the State would have spent money
in vain with no productive returns from a bulk of our university
students who will largely be unemployable.
Therefore steps should be taken to strengthen the vocational
sector of higher education which will turn out products which
would be productive to themselves and the country at large. As
mentioned the higher education sector should be looked at afresh
from the point of view of a cost benefit assessment. The large
numbers who have left the country for greener pastures after
having got the benefit of higher education should warrant such a
move.
Hopefully the President's comments would see a sea change in
the country's higher education set up with the accent on
productivity rather than maintaining universities for the sake
of it. Those benefiting from free education should be made
accountable and worthy recipients of the facility. |