Implementing health-related MDGs:
The Sri Lankan record
Dr. Kahandaliyanage |
From the statement made by Healthcare and
Nutrition Ministry Secretary Dr. H.A.P. Kahandaliyanage at the
High-level segment ECOSOC Annual Ministerial Review in Geneva on July 8,
on “Implementing the Internationally Agreed Goals and commitments in
regard of global public health.
The Secretary-General’s report on the theme of this debate, while
highlighting successes, outlines the challenges ahead of the
international community in respect of health-related Millenium
Development Goals (MDGs). As the Report summarizes, health is at the
heart of the MDGs and a critical pre-condition for progress on most of
them. In today’s globalized world, external circumstances significantly
impact on national progress.
Against this background, we are concerned that the multiple crises
facing the world could even reverse the progress made by developing
countries in achieving the MDGs. As a result of the global financial
crisis, resources available to the health sector from within national
budgets and from international partners, are likely to shrink.
Simultaneously, other global challenges such as the world food crisis,
food insecurity and rising food prices are likely to adversely affect
public health, and to aggravate under-nutrition and malnutrition.
Similarly, the adverse long-term impacts of climate change are likely to
affect human health in multiple ways.
The concept and goals of development have evolved over the past
decades in a gradual move away from an exclusively or largely material
view to a holistic view of human development. Development as it is
understood today and as embodied in the (Internationally Agreed
Development Goals) IADGs and MDGs, encompasses goals related to human
well-being, including freedom and empowerment of people, distribution
patterns and environmental sustainability. Despite added challenges,
such a broader dimension of development is aligned with Sri Lanka’s
pluralistic democratic traditions and its commitment to a people-centred
development. Sri Lanka is committed to the realization of the IADGs and
MDGs that we have collectively undertaken.
Sri Lanka guarantees effective access to free health
services. ANCL file photo |
My delegation believes that health promotional policies and spending
are justified, not only because they promote human welfare, which is
valued for its own sake, but also because they are a part of a society’s
investment for further production and growth. Health is an essential
input to the process of human capital accumulation, which enables
individuals to achieve greater material success in life and States to
generate higher national economic growth.
In Sri Lanka, our experience over the past decades has demonstrated
that there are clear socio-economic benefits to be derived from
improving health conditions of people and that there are strong positive
relationships between investments in health and economic growth.
Public healthcare in Sri Lanka
In many other countries improvements in people’s health conditions
followed economic growth; Sri Lanka, however, used its revenues to
improve people’s health conditions even before attaining such progress.
It is said that globally millions are found unable to seek and obtain
needed healthcare because of inability to meet costs. Sri Lanka,
however, has developed over the years a very healthcare-friendly system
for its people.
Despite our limited resources as a developing country, Sri Lanka have
made commendable progress in the health sector. While the
Secretary-General’s report identifies maternal and new born health as an
area in which much more progress is needed world-wide, in Sri Lanka, the
infant mortality rate has declined from 19.8 per 1000 live births in
1990 to 11.2 in 2005, which is one of the lowest for a developing
country. Maternal Mortality Rate (MMR) has declined from 4.23 per 10,000
live births in 1991 to 1.97 in 2003 and is on par with developed
countries. Under-five mortality rate had declined in 2005 to less than
half of what it was in 1990.
Immunization program
The immunization program has been a great success and we have
effectively controlled or eliminated all vaccine-preventable diseases.
Life expectancy at birth has gradually risen to 71.7 years for males and
76.4 years for females. Sri Lanka has already eliminated the
debilitating diseases like filariasis, leprosy, polio and measles as
well as iodine deficiency disorders. The health authorities in Sri Lanka
are confident of being able to achieve complete malaria elimination by
2015. The prevalence of HIV/Aids in Sri Lanka is low and it is not
widespread in the country. All the above health indicators are
considered rather exceptional for a developing country with a GNP per
capita of US$ 1970.
Progress in the health sector has been positively influenced by the
progress we have simultaneously made on other spheres of human and
social development. These include high literacy rates among men and
women, which have reached 89 per cent for females and 92 per cent for
males. We have achieved near universal primary school enrolment covering
both male and female children. Empowerment of women through gender
equality, female literacy and equality in women’s access to economic
resources has had a direct beneficial impact on our success in maternal
and new born health. Sri Lanka’s experience substantiates the
observation made in the Secretary-General’s Report that “maternal and
new born health is also linked with education of both women and men and
women’s access to economic resources.”
The expansion and improvement of health infrastructure was mostly
responsible for improved health indicators.
Two salient features of the management of Sri Lanka’s public sector
healthcare system have been the provision of healthcare free of charge
and the provision of services close to patient. The public sector in
healthcare has expanded to be able to treat over 4.6 million in-patients
and 43 million out-patients. We have around 1 doctor per 1300 population
and the current medical intake assures an improvement in this ratio in
the future.
Our healthcare system, with its public and private sectors, has
gradually developed into one of universal coverage. It has been based on
the principle of equity and social justice for the past six decades.
Benefits of Government health expenditure reach the poor effectively as
health services are widely dispersed to reach out to people in even the
distant rural areas as well. Sri Lanka guarantees effective access to
free health services, especially hospital care, for the poor, while
permitting private facilities to expand, which the more affluent opt to
use. Our healthcare system has thus been able to protect the poor and
the middle classes against catastrophic financial risks associated with
illness.
Achievements in health
The Government takes on the major burden of meeting the people’s
in-patient, out-patient and community health needs. Financed by tax
revenues, our public sector healthcare institutions ensure that
everybody has access to needed health services. Sri Lanka’s achievements
in this regard are commendable as these results were achieved by
spending only two percent of GNP on health. Sri Lanka incurs an
estimated per capita annual health expenditure of US$ 50, out of which
the Government bears US$ 23. Sri Lanka’s achievement however, is that
its population enjoys health outcomes that are comparable to those of
more developed countries spending several times more on health on a per
capita basis.
Healthcare in conflict- hit areas
Sri Lanka’s experience relating to maintaining healthcare
infrastructure and providing healthcare in times of conflict and crisis
is also unique. During the past three decades, the Liberation Tamil
Tigers of Eelam (LTTE), a terrorist group proscribed in over 30
democratic countries worldwide, claimed to control parts of the North
and the East through the use of force. Even in the so-called LTTE
controlled areas, the Government continued to effectively deliver
healthcare services to the civilians.
All health infrastructure, including hospitals, medicines, doctors,
nurses and healthcare personnel were maintained through funds allocated
by the Government since the inception of the conflict.
Healthcare infrastructure and provisions have been maintained in
these conflict-affected regions despite the well-known fact that much of
the supplies and facilities were being used by the LTTE for their own
cadres.
The regular dispatch of medical provisions to the conflict areas by
land, air and sea routes was challenging and a risky operation, and its
continuation for almost three decades demonstrates on the one hand, the
Government’s commitment to looking after the health related needs of all
civilians, and on the other hand, the resilience of the healthcare
infrastructure and facilities even in conflict situations.
Today, the Government has been successful in defeating terrorism in
Sri Lanka.
We are now effectively facing up to the challenge of providing the
necessary care and assistance including healthcare to the displaced
civilians, who had previously been held hostage by the LTTE and who are
now awaiting early voluntary resettlement.
The Health Ministry has mobilized its resources to a maximum for this
purpose, with the assistance of the international community, including
UN agencies, ICRC and local and international NGOs working in the health
sector. Seven hospitals are providing facilities for the IDPs in the
North and east.
Additional medical officers and nurses have been dispatched to these
areas. The bed capacity has been increased and adequate stocks of
essential drugs made available to the hospitals in the North.
Healthcare facilities are also provided in the welfare sites.
Preventive healthcare facilities are in place. Routine immunization,
drinking water quality surveillance, family planning and dental care are
carried out. Primary healthcare centres have also been set up covering
10,000 - 15,000 people per site.
Mental health and psycho-social support have been made available.
Most displaced civilians are in poor nutritional health status due to
their prolonged stay in areas under LTTE control.
Our healthcare authorities have taken up the task of bringing their
health gradually to conditions comparable to those in the rest of the
country. UNICEF has been an important partner in this process.
Future challenges
Given the centrality of health to all aspects of human welfare, we
need to be mindful of future challenges related to health, both at
national and global levels, so that reaching MDG targets is facilitated.
The burden of disease in Sri Lanka is gradually shifting from
communicable to non-communicable diseases.
The ageing population raises the demand for expensive, but less
effective services in elderly care. Under-nutrition due to poverty
remains as a part of an unfinished health agenda. Sri Lanka’s Health
Master Plan proposes remedial measures to move towards greater equity
and minimization of regional disparities in healthcare delivery through
improved access to quality services. This is the main guiding principle
in determining allocation of capital investment in the health sector.
We need to explore collectively ways and means of ensuring that
health systems are protected to the greatest degree possible from the
impact of the world financial crisis.
Financing healthcare is the predominant challenge we face right now
and we see this as an emerging problem in the coming years.
Healthcare financing needs of developing countries are exacerbated by
increasingly sophisticated technology that doctors and patients demand.
Leading global financial agencies, such as the World Bank, the IMF and
the ADB have a responsibility to find innovative ways and means to
bridge gaps that are being created by the global financial crisis.
The contribution from foreign aid in Sri Lanka has been traditionally
marginal. This is partly a reflection of the limited global outflow of
ODA resources from developed countries, in spite of the 0.7 per cent of
GDP commitment.
Collective effort
In conclusion, budgetary support for the social and development
sectors, in general, and for the achievement of health related MDGs in
particular, is ultimately dependent on the availability of resources
generated by a country’s economic progress.
Therefore, the long-term sustainability of the efforts by developing
countries to achieve the MDGs is dependent on an enabling global
environment for trade expansion and economic development.
External impediments such as barriers to trade, protectionism and
inadequate access to concessionary financing need to be addressed as an
inherent part of the global partnership that we have collectively
undertaken, and embodied in the MDG’s, to improve the lives of millions. |