Role of the global community
Sri Lanka has defied the
conventional wisdom that terrorist movements cannot be defeated
militarily, with the total elimination of the LTTE leadership
and cadres. This should be a cause of jubilation for all
countries battling terrorism. Yet, there are indications that
certain countries are unhappy over little Sri Lanka's
accomplishment. An attempt is being made to sully Sri Lanka's
reputation by dragging in issues such as human rights.
It is often said that wars and human rights are mutually
exclusive concepts. But Sri Lanka's conflict was unique in the
sense that the Government and the Security Forces were fighting
to secure the human rights of the Tamil civilians held hostage
by the ruthless LTTE. The Eastern and Northern liberation
campaigns were rightly described as humanitarian missions for
this reason.
Even Sri Lanka's bitterest critics have accepted the fact
that the Tigers were holding nearly 300,000 civilians as a human
shield and firing at those who tried to flee towards Government
lines. In fact, the last stage of the humanitarian mission was
called the 'biggest hostage rescue mission in the world'. It
turned out to be just that, with nearly 200,000 civilians
eagerly crossing over towards the troops. The troops engaged in
this task without shedding any civilian blood, which is in
itself a great achievement.
It is ironic that countries who are pressing for action
against Sri Lanka on the human rights front have either failed
to see or ignored civilian deaths in Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iraq
and the Gaza Strip. These deaths are brushed aside as collateral
damage while the Sri Lankan State's legitimate right to battle a
terror group and rescue civilians is called a war crime.
It would be naive to assume that civilian casualties could be
totally avoided in any war, especially in a situation where the
insurgents mingle with the civilian population. But the Sri
Lankan Government gave a clear order to the Security Forces to
ensure Zero Civilian Casualties.
The Government gave ample time for the Tigers to surrender.
Around 9,000 cadres who did so are to be rehabilitated after the
proper legal procedures. There is every reason to believe that
hundreds more who did not take that route have crossed over with
the civilians. The Government has a right to look for them in
the IDP camps. The Government has also assured that resettlement
could begin within months as demining and reconstruction starts.
In the meantime, the civilians are being provided the necessary
facilities. Their stay in the IDP camps will be a temporary one
and is necessary for their own safety. It is indeed perplexing
why certain countries see this too as a rights violation.
It is in this context that at least 18 countries in the UN
Human Rights Council are supporting a resolution tabled by Sri
Lanka that endorses its victory against terrorism, while
opposing any human rights probe. These countries, which include
Russia, China, India, Pakistan, Indonesia, Egypt and Malaysia
are of the view that Sri Lanka's fight against terrorism was
purely an internal matter that should not be scrutinized by the
international community. Several other countries including Chile
and Mexico had called for a compromise resolution incorporating
elements of this draft and the one submitted by a number of
Western powers.
What Sri Lanka needs at this moment is not a probe that would
aggravate the wounds of conflict, but international assistance
for the process of rehabilitation and reconstruction of the
North.
Indeed, the resolution, tabled by Sri Lanka calls for the UN
to cooperate with the Sri Lankan Government in providing
humanitarian assistance. President Mahinda Rajapaksa, the
architect of the victory against terrorism, has urged the
international community to help the rebuilding effort. As MP
Basil Rajapaksa, who plays a key role in Eastern and Northern
rehabilitation, recently noted, Sri Lanka does not need
'monitors' at this stage - it needs partners for redeveloping
the North. There is no doubt that the issue with regard to
access to IDP camps would be resolved as security conditions
improve. In the meantime, that should not be a hindrance for
helping the displaced.
Nevertheless, some countries are advocating exactly the
opposite by trying to curtail aid to Sri Lanka. That will have a
negative effect on the very people that these countries urge the
Government to protect - the IDPs, as Sri Lanka will need
additional funds to ensure their welfare. The Government will
need international help for the overall development of the North
which has borne the brunt of the conflict for three decades.
Sri Lanka is at a very significant juncture in its history,
having defeated the world's most ruthless terrorists. It is now
chartering a course towards lasting peace and reconciliation.
The international community should sincerely assist this noble
endeavour. |